Tomonori Tetsunaga

Dr. Tomonori Tetsunaga

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 January 2017 in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTomonori Tetsunaga
Tomonori Tetsunaga
KFKazuo Fujiwara
Kazuo Fujiwara
HEHirosuke Endo
Hirosuke Endo
TNTomoyuki Noda
Tomoyuki Noda
TSToru Sato
Toru Sato
TOToshifumi Ozaki
Toshifumi Ozaki

1 January 2015 in Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTTomonori Tetsunaga
Tomonori Tetsunaga
Masato TanakaMasato Tanaka
Masato Tanaka
TOToshifumi Ozaki
Toshifumi Ozaki

4 February 2020 in HIP International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TTTomonori Tetsunaga
Tomonori Tetsunaga
KYKazuki Yamada
Kazuki Yamada
TTTomoko Tetsunaga
Tomoko Tetsunaga
TFTakayuki Furumatsu
Takayuki Furumatsu
TSTomoaki Sanki
Tomoaki Sanki
TOToshifumi Ozaki
Toshifumi Ozaki
The accuracies of various navigation systems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been described; however, the accuracy of cup orientation with an accelerometer-based navigation system has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracies of computed tomography (CT)- and accelerometer-based navigation systems for cup orientation in THA. In this prospective study, 30 patients who underwent cementless THA via anterolateral approach in the lateral decubitus position were analysed. A CT-based navigation system (30 hips) and an accelerometer-based navigation system (30 hips) were used simultaneously. The accuracy of cup orientation (absolute difference between intraoperative vs. postoperative measurements) was compared between the navigation systems using postoperative CT. The accuracy of cup inclination was 3.2 ± 2.4° in the CT-based navigation group and 4.1 ± 3.7° in the accelerometer-based navigation group (p = 0.3035). The accuracy of cup anteversion was 3.0° ± 2.5° in the CT-based navigation group and 6.8° ± 4.8° in the accelerometer-based navigation group. Cup anteversion was significantly more accurate with the CT-based navigation system than with accelerometer-based navigation (p = 0.0009). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the malposition in cup anteversion was positively correlated with the change in pelvic tilt and loosening of the reference antenna. Although, these results are only true for this specific accelerometer system, cup positioning was significantly more accurate with the CT-based navigation system than an accelerometer-based navigation in the lateral decubitus position. This is because of considerable discrepancies in the sagittal pelvic tilt, resulting in variability in cup anteversion angle with the use of an accelerometer-based navigation system.

1 January 2015 in Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTomonori Tetsunaga
Tomonori Tetsunaga
TSToru Sato
Toru Sato
NSNaofumi Shiota
Naofumi Shiota
MYMasahiro Yoshida
Masahiro Yoshida
YOYoshiki Okazaki
Yoshiki Okazaki
KYKazuki Yamada
Kazuki Yamada
Tetsunaga T, et al. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015 Jun;7(2):164-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.2.164

1 April 2008
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HDHideyuki Doi
Hideyuki Doi
KNKeiichiro Nishida
Keiichiro Nishida
MYMasanori Yorimitsu
Masanori Yorimitsu
TKTakamitsu Komiyama
Takamitsu Komiyama
YKYasutaka Kadota
Yasutaka Kadota
TOToshifumi Ozaki
Toshifumi Ozaki

15 April 2020 in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTomonori Tetsunaga
Tomonori Tetsunaga
KYKazuki Yamada
Kazuki Yamada
TSTomoaki Sanki
Tomoaki Sanki
YKYoshi Kawamura
Yoshi Kawamura
TOToshifumi Ozaki
Toshifumi Ozaki
Background: Inadequate acetabular component orientation is associated with postoperative impingement, dislocation, and accelerated polyethylene wear. Computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems provide accuracy for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but are not available in all facilities. Accelerometer-based navigation systems are inexpensive, but their accuracy remains undetermined. This study compares the accuracy of cup orientation in THA using CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems. Methods: This retrospective study included 35 consecutive patients (11 males, 24 females; mean age, 65 years) who underwent primary cementless THA via an anterolateral approach in the supine position. Both CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems were used simultaneously. The accuracy of cup orientation was compared between the two systems using postoperative CT. Results: The accuracy of cup inclination was 2.7° ± 2.0° in the CT-based group and 3.3° ± 2.4° in the accelerometer-based group. The accuracy of cup anteversion was 2.8° ± 2.6° in the CT-based group and 3.4° ± 2.2° in the accelerometer-based group. No significant difference was observed in cup inclination (p = 0.29) or cup anteversion (p = 0.34) between CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation. Conclusions: The accuracy of cup positioning did not differ significantly between CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems.