Cristina García Iglesias

Dr. Cristina García Iglesias

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 December 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CICristina García Iglesias
Cristina García Iglesias
FPFrancesca Puledda
Francesca Puledda
AEAna Echavarría-Íñiguez
Ana Echavarría-Íñiguez
YOYesica Gonzalez Osorio
Yesica Gonzalez Osorio
AMAlvaro Sierra Mencia
Alvaro Sierra Mencia
DGDavid García-Azorín
David García-Azorín
Nummular headache (NH) is a primary headache characterized by superficial coin-shaped pain. NUMITOR (NCT 05475769) is an observational study evaluating the responder rate of preventive drugs in NH patients. The treatment response was assessed between weeks 8 and 12 compared with the baseline. Patients were included between February 2002 and October 2022. Demographic and clinical variables were assessed; treatment response was estimated by 50%, 30%, and 75% responder rates and treatment discontinuation due to inadequate tolerability. A total of 183 out of 282 patients fulfilled eligibility criteria and completed the study. Patients were aged 49.5 (standard deviation (SD): 16.8) years, and 60.7% were female. NH phenotype was a parietal circular pain of four centimeters’ diameter, moderate intensity, and oppressive quality. At baseline, patients had 25 (interquartile range) pain days per month. Preventive treatment was used by 114 (62.3%) patients. The highest 50% and 75% responder rates corresponded to onabotulinumtoxinA (62.5%, 47.5%), followed by gabapentin (43.7%, 35.2%). Oral preventive drugs were not tolerated by 12.9–25%. The present study provides class IV evidence of the effectiveness of oral preventive drugs and onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of primary NH. OnabotulinumtoxinA was the most effective and best-tolerated drug, positioning it as first-line treatment of NH.

20 September 2023 in Cephalalgia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CICristina García Iglesias
Cristina García Iglesias
AGAna González-Celestino
Ana González-Celestino
ÁMÁlvaro Sierra Mencía
Álvaro Sierra Mencía
YOYésica González Osorio
Yésica González Osorio
AGAndrea Recio García
Andrea Recio García
AGAngel L L Guerrero
Angel L L Guerrero
Background: Since the first description of nummular headache (NH), more than 500 cases have been described, delineating its clinical phenotype and response to treatment. However, data on the natural history of NH and outcomes during long-term follow-up are not currently available. The present study aimed to describe the long-term outcomes and follow-up of a large series of patients with NH. Methods: A descriptive observational ambisective study with a series of cases was conducted. The study population included adult patients with primary NH and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Demographic variables, previous medical history, clinical phenotype, diagnosis and treatment of NH, temporal pattern, and long-term evolution were analysed. Results: In total, 168 patients were enrolled and followed for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 80.5 (55–118.5) months. The temporal pattern after NH onset was chronic in 67.9% and, at diagnosis, the median (IQR) number of pain days per month was 20 [10–30] days with 138 (82.1%) patients with ≥8 days of pain per month. Preventive treatment was needed by 112 (66.7%) patients. The most frequently used drugs were gabapentin (69/112; 61.6%), onabotulinumtoxinA (38/112; 33.9%), amitriptyline (31/112; 27.7%) and lamotrigine (21/112; 18.7%). Response to preventive treatment was at least partial in 91/112 (81.3%) patients. At the end of follow-up, 81 (48.2%) patients had inactive NH. Of patients with active NH, the median (IQR) number of headache days per month was 3 (1–12) days and patients had ≥8 days of pain in 35 (20.8%) cases. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of NH were positive in most patients. After a median of 6.7 years of follow-up, 48% of cases were inactive. Two-thirds of patients required preventive treatment, and 80% of them were treatment-responsive. In NH cases that remained symptomatic, the headache frequency was lower, and the proportion of patients with chronic NH decreased from 68% to 11%.

22 July 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDavid García-Azorín
David García-Azorín
CGClaudia García-Ruiz
Claudia García-Ruiz
AMAlvaro Sierra Mencia
Alvaro Sierra Mencia
YOYesica Gonzalez Osorio
Yesica Gonzalez Osorio
ARAndrea Recio-Garcia
Andrea Recio-Garcia
AGAngel L L Guerrero
Angel L L Guerrero
To describe the need and effectiveness of acute and preventive medications in a series of 100 consecutive patients referred due to COVID-19-related headaches. Patients were aged 48.0 (standard deviation (SD): 12.4), 84% were female, and 56% had a prior history of headache. The most common headache phenotype was holocranial (63%), frontal (48%), pressing (75%), of moderate intensity (7 out of 10), and accompanied by photophobia (58%). Acute medication was required by 93%, with paracetamol (46%) being the most frequently used drug, followed by ibuprofen (44%). The drugs with the highest proportion of a 2 h pain-freedom response were dexketoprofen (58.8%), triptans (57.7%), and ibuprofen (54.3%). Preventive treatment was required by 75% of patients. The most frequently used drugs were amitriptyline (66%), anesthetic blockades (18%), and onabotulinumtoxinA (11%). The drugs with the highest 50% responder rate were amitriptyline (45.5%), mirtazapine (50%), and anesthetic blockades (38.9%). The highest 75% responder rate was experienced following onabotulinumtoxinA (18.2%). In conclusion, most patients required acute medication, with triptans and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs achieving the best responses. Three-quarters of patients required preventive medication. The most frequently used drug was amitriptyline, which obtained the best results. In some treatment-resistant patients, anesthetic blockades and onabotulinumtoxinA were also beneficial.

27 November 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HRHenar Ruiz-Saez
Henar Ruiz-Saez
AEAna Echavarría-Íñiguez
Ana Echavarría-Íñiguez
YOYesica Gonzalez Osorio
Yesica Gonzalez Osorio
JLJavier Trigo López
Javier Trigo López
AMAlvaro Sierra Mencia
Alvaro Sierra Mencia
DGDavid García-Azorín
David García-Azorín
Background: Headache is a common symptom during acute viral infections, and its pathophysiology has been linked with the immune response to the virus. Headache is one of the most frequent symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and it has been associated with a more efficient immune response and a better prognosis. The aim of this article is to evaluate whether vaccination could modify the clinical phenotype and the probability of developing persistent headache after acute COVID-19. Methods: A case–control study comparing the duration of the headache and the clinical phenotype between fully vaccinated individuals and non-vaccinated controls was conducted. Each case was matched with two controls that were paired by age, sex, and prior history of headache. Patients were evaluated by a physician that administered a structured questionnaire and were followed up for at least three months. Results: The sample included 103 cases and 206 controls, with a median age of 42 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 33–51); 68% were female; and 26% had a prior history of headache. Headache had a shorter duration for vaccinated patients (4 (IQR 2–8) vs. 8 (IQR 4–16.5) days, p < 0.001). Vaccinated patients had a higher frequency of holocranial topography, pressing quality, phonophobia, and cranial autonomic symptoms. Conclusions: Our results suggest that full vaccination modifies the clinical phenotype of COVID-19 onset-associated headache and might lead to a shorter duration. These findings could represent an additional benefit of COVID-19 vaccines, which could extend to the post-COVID-19 phase and decrease the probability of a persistent disabling symptom such as headache.