Roberto Trasarti

Dr. Roberto Trasarti


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2021 in Ethics and Information Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mirco NanniMirco Nanni
Mirco Nanni
GAGennady Andrienko
Gennady Andrienko
ABAlbert-László Barabási
Albert-László Barabási
CBChiara Boldrini
Chiara Boldrini
FBFrancesco Bonchi
Francesco Bonchi
AVAlessandro Vespignani
Alessandro Vespignani
The rapid dynamics of COVID-19 calls for quick and effective tracking of virus transmission chains and early detection of outbreaks, especially in the “phase 2” of the pandemic, when lockdown and other restriction measures are progressively withdrawn, in order to avoid or minimize contagion resurgence. For this purpose, contact-tracing apps are being proposed for large scale adoption by many countries. A centralized approach, where data sensed by the app are all sent to a nation-wide server, raises concerns about citizens’ privacy and needlessly strong digital surveillance, thus alerting us to the need to minimize personal data collection and avoiding location tracking. We advocate the conceptual advantage of a decentralized approach, where both contact and location data are collected exclusively in individual citizens’ “personal data stores”, to be shared separately and selectively (e.g., with a backend system, but possibly also with other citizens), voluntarily, only when the citizen has tested positive for COVID-19, and with a privacy preserving level of granularity. This approach better protects the personal sphere of citizens and affords multiple benefits: it allows for detailed information gathering for infected people in a privacy-preserving fashion; and, in turn this enables both contact tracing, and, the early detection of outbreak hotspots on more finely-granulated geographic scale. The decentralized approach is also scalable to large populations, in that only the data of positive patients need be handled at a central level. Our recommendation is two-fold. First to extend existing decentralized architectures with a light touch, in order to manage the collection of location data locally on the device, and allow the user to share spatio-temporal aggregates—if and when they want and for specific aims—with health authorities, for instance. Second, we favour a longer-term pursuit of realizing a Personal Data Store vision, giving users the opportunity to contribute to collective good in the measure they want, enhancing self-awareness, and cultivating collective efforts for rebuilding society.

20 April 2009
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
MBMiriam Baglioni
Miriam Baglioni
JMJosé Antônio Fernandes de Macêdo
José Antônio Fernandes de Macêdo
CRChiara Renso
Chiara Renso
RTRoberto Trasarti
Roberto Trasarti
MWMonica Wachowicz
Monica Wachowicz

31 March 2020 in International Journal of Data Science and Analytics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GAGennady Andrienko
Gennady Andrienko
NANatalia Andrienko
Natalia Andrienko
CBChiara Boldrini
Chiara Boldrini
GCGuido Caldarelli
Guido Caldarelli
PCPaolo Cintia
Paolo Cintia
RTRoberto Trasarti
Roberto Trasarti
The exponential increase in the availability of large-scale mobility data has fueled the vision of smart cities that will transform our lives. The truth is that we have just scratched the surface of the research challenges that should be tackled in order to make this vision a reality. Consequently, there is an increasing interest among different research communities (ranging from civil engineering to computer science) and industrial stakeholders in building knowledge discovery pipelines over such data sources. At the same time, this widespread data availability also raises privacy issues that must be considered by both industrial and academic stakeholders. In this paper, we provide a wide perspective on the role that big data have in reshaping cities. The paper covers the main aspects of urban data analytics, focusing on privacy issues, algorithms, applications and services, and georeferenced data from social media. In discussing these aspects, we leverage, as concrete examples and case studies of urban data science tools, the results obtained in the “City of Citizens” thematic area of the Horizon 2020 SoBigData initiative, which includes a virtual research environment with mobility datasets and urban analytics methods developed by several institutions around Europe. We conclude the paper outlining the main research challenges that urban data science has yet to address in order to help make the smart city vision a reality.

27 June 2017 in Information
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBarbara Furletti
Barbara Furletti
RTRoberto Trasarti
Roberto Trasarti
PCPaolo Cintia
Paolo Cintia
LGLorenzo Gabrielli
Lorenzo Gabrielli
The increasing availability of large amounts of data and digital footprints has given rise to ambitious research challenges in many fields, which spans from medical research, financial and commercial world, to people and environmental monitoring. Whereas traditional data sources and census fail in capturing actual and up-to-date behaviors, Big Data integrate the missing knowledge providing useful and hidden information to analysts and decision makers. With this paper, we focus on the identification of city events by analyzing mobile phone data (Call Detail Record), and we study and evaluate the impact of these events over the typical city dynamics. We present an analytical process able to discover, understand and characterize city events from Call Detail Record, designing a distributed computation to implement Sociometer, that is a profiling tool to categorize phone users. The methodology provides an useful tool for city mobility manager to manage the events and taking future decisions on specific classes of users, i.e., residents, commuters and tourists.

2 November 2010
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
AMAnna Monreale
Anna Monreale
RTRoberto Trasarti
Roberto Trasarti
CRChiara Renso
Chiara Renso
DPDino Pedreschi
Dino Pedreschi
VBVania Bogorny
Vania Bogorny
The increasing abundance of data about the trajectories of personal movement is opening up new opportunities for analyzing and mining human mobility, but new risks emerge since it opens new ways of intruding into personal privacy. Representing the personal movements as sequences of places visited by a person during her/his movements - semantic trajectory - poses even greater privacy threats w.r.t. raw geometric location data. In this paper we propose a privacy model defining the attack model of semantic trajectory linking, together with a privacy notion, called c-safety. This method provides an upper bound to the probability of inferring that a given person, observed in a sequence of nonsensitive places, has also stopped in any sensitive location. Coherently with the privacy model, we propose an algorithm for transforming any dataset of semantic trajectories into a c-safe one. We report a study on a real-life GPS trajectory dataset to show how our algorithm preserves interesting quality/utility measures of the original trajectories, such as sequential pattern mining results.

2 November 2010
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
FGFosca Giannotti
Fosca Giannotti
Mirco NanniMirco Nanni
Mirco Nanni
DPDino Pedreschi
Dino Pedreschi
FPFabio Pinelli
Fabio Pinelli
CRChiara Renso
Chiara Renso
RTRoberto Trasarti
Roberto Trasarti
The analysis of movement data has been recently fostered by the widespread diffusion of new techniques and systems for monitoring, collecting and storing location-aware data, generated by a wealth of technological infrastructures, such as GPS positioning and wireless networks [2]. These have made available massive repositories of spatio-temporal data recording human mobile activities, such as location data from mobile phones, GPS tracks from mobile devices, etc.: is it possible to discover from these data useful and timely knowledge about human mobility? The GeoPKDD project [1], since 2005, investigated this direction of research; the lesson learned is that there is a long way to go from raw data of individual trajectories up to high-level collective mobility knowledge, capable of supporting the decisions of mobility and transportation managers. Such analysts reason about semantically rich concepts, such as systematic vs. occasional movement behavior and homework commuting patterns; accordingly, the mainstream analytical tools of transportation engineering, such as origin/destination matrices, are based on semantically rich data collected by means of field surveys and interviews. Clearly, the price to pay for this richness is hard: mass surveys are very expensive, so that their periodicity is very broad and obsolescence is rapid; poor data quality is also a plague: people tend to respond elusively and inaccurately. On the other extreme, automatically sensed mobility data record individual trajectories at mass level, in real time. Clearly, the price to pay here is exactly the lack of semantics in raw data: How to bridge this deficiency? Current generation of analysis systems and methods on mobility data are based on standard statistical techniques, such as movement distributions among the city areas. However, we claim that these are not sufficient to express movement oriented analysis. For example, detecting subgroups of users having similar movements is a behaviour not captured by standars statistic techniques, due to the strong variability among individuals movements.