Background: Medication nonadherence in patients with chronic diseases, particularly in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with comorbidity, has continued to be the cause of treatment failure. The current study assessed medication adherence and its impact on glycemic control in T2DM patients with comorbidity. Methods: An institutional-based multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among T2DM patients with comorbidity at the selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. Medication adherence was measured using a structured questionnaire of the General Medication Adherence Scale (GMAS). A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of the level of medication adherence and glycemic control. P < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI) was statistically significant. Results: A total of 403 samples were included in the final study. This study showed that more than three-fourths (76.9%) of the participants were under a low level of medication adherence. Source of medication cost coverage [AOR = 10.593, 95% CI (2.628–41.835; P = 0.003], monthly income (P < 0.00), self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) practice [AOR = 0.266, 95% CI (0.117–0.604); P = 0.002], number of medications [AOR = 0.068, 95% CI (0.004–0.813); P = 0.014] and medical conditions [AOR = 0.307, 95% CI (0.026–0.437); P = 0.018] were found to be significant predictors of medication adherence. Significantly, majority (74.7%) of participants had poor levels of glycemic control. Patients who had a high level of medication adherence [AOR = 0.003, 95% CI (0.000–0.113); P = 0.002] were found less likely to have poor glycemic control compared with patients who were low adherent to their medications. Conclusion: The current study concluded that medication adherence was low and significantly associated with poor glycemic control. Number of medical conditions and medications were found to be associated with medication adherence. Management interventions of T2DM patients with comorbidity should focus on the improvement of medication adherence.

Background: Insulin is an effective therapeutic agent in the management of diabetes, but also sensitive to the external environment. Consequently, diabetic patients’ adherence to insulin delivery recommendations is critical for better effectiveness. Patients’ lack of knowledge, skill and irrational practices towards appropriate insulin delivery techniques may end up in therapeutic failure and increase costs of therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ knowledge, skills and practices of insulin storage and injection techniques. Methods: An interview-based cross-sectional study was conducted through purposive selection of participants in Northwest Ethiopian primary hospitals from March 1 to May 30, 2019. Levels of knowledge were assessed with right or wrong responses, while practice was measured by using a 4-point Likert scale structured questionnaire collected via face-to-face interviews. Likewise, a five-point observational (demonstration) techniques checklist employed to assess patients’ skills. Results: Among 194 patients approached, 166 participants completed the survey giving a response rate of 85.6%. More than half of the respondents (54.8%) were males and the mean age (±SD) was 38.5 ± 13.8 years. The overall patients’ median knowledge and practice levels on insulin storage and handling techniques were moderately adequate (64.3%) and fair (55.4%), respectively. In patients’ skill assessments, 94.6% correctly showed injection sites, 70% indicated injection site rotations, and 60.75% practiced injection site rotations. Education (P < 0.001), duration of insulin therapy (P = 0.008), and duration of diabetes (P = 0.014) had significant impact on knowledge level. Education (P < 0.001), occupation (P < 0.001), duration of insulin therapy (P = 0.001), duration of diabetes (P = 0.036) and patients’ knowledge level (P < 0.001) were found to have a significant effects on the patients’ practice levels. A Mann-Whitney U test also disclosed that residency, ways to get insulin and mocked injection technique during the first training had significant effects on patients’ knowledge levels. Conclusion: The current study revealed that patients had moderately adequate knowledge and fair practice levels on insulin storage and handling techniques. However, patients missed important insulin administration skills. This study highlights the need of regular public health education so as to enhance the patients’ knowledge, skill and practice levels on insulin handling techniques.

Background: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the backbone of and primary choice for long-term asthma control therapy; however, the level of adherence to this regimen has not yet been investigated, particularly in the study area of Northwest Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the level of adherence to ICS treatment and its impact on adults living with asthma in Northwestern Ethiopian hospitals. Materials and Methods: A multicenter institution-based survey was conducted in asthma patients treated with ICS-based regimens in public hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia. Adherence to ICS was measured with the Medication Adherence Report Scale for Asthma. Descriptive statistics were used to present respondents’ characteristics, and logistic regression was used to test associations between predictors and outcome variables. A level of p< 0.05 was used as a cut-off point for a significant association. Results: Of a total of 422 approached subjects, 96.7% completed the survey. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 49.82 (± 16.1) years. The majority of participants (86.1%) had a low level of adherence to ICS treatment. A significant proportion (42%) of the respondents reported that they utilized ICS only before performing exercises that made them breathless. Around two-fifths of the participants used ICS either when they needed it or when they felt breathless. Furthermore, one-third of the study subjects reported that they either avoided or forgot to take ICS. Participants who had access to free healthcare services had better adherence to ICS (p=0.01), and non-adherence to ICS therapy was significantly associated with poor levels of asthma control (p≤ 0.001). Conclusion: This study found that adult patients with asthma had low levels of adherence to ICS therapy. Future prospective research in a larger population, focusing on identifying the obstacles to ICS adherence in patients living with asthma and creating successful intervention options, is recommended.

Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have continued to be a public health challenge with significant clinical and healthcare costs. However, little is known regarding the incidence of ADR in Ethiopia, particularly in the study setting. Thus, this study aimed to assess the incidence and patterns of ADRs in patients admitted to the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital (UoGCSH).Methods: A prospective observational follow-up study was conducted on admitted patients at the medical ward in the UoGCSH from May to August 2022. A multifaceted approach involving daily chart review and patient interviews was employed to collect the data. A standard Naranjo ADR Probability Scale measuring tool was used to characterize the probability of existing ADR. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the association between the occurrence of ADRs and other variables. A p-value at the 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant.Results: This study included 237 participants in total. The average length of follow-up was 16.4 (±5.2) days. Overall, 65 ADRs were identified, resulting an incidence rate of 27.4 (95% CI: 19.8–30.4) per 100 admissions. The most common ADRs were hypokalemia (10.7%), followed by constipation, diarrhea, hypotension, and rash (9.2% each). The majority of these ADRs (73.8%) were classified as "definite" by the Naranjo ADR probability scale. Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) (41.5%) and metabolic (18.6%) were the most frequently exposed systems for ADR. Antibiotics (26.2%) and cardiovascular medications (24.7%) were the most frequently implicated medications in existing ADRs. ADRs were significantly associated with age (p = 0.035), the presence of comorbidities (p = 0.021) and complications (p = 0.008), and receiving a higher number of medications (p = 0.04).Conclusion: In this study, ADR was identified in about one-fourth of the participants. Older patients, patients with comorbidities and complications, and patients who received a higher number of medications were more likely exposed for ADRs. Healthcare providers should strictly follow the admitted patients to minimize ADRs.

Objectives This study assessed the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and its determinants in patients with diabetes. Design and setting An institutional-based multicentre prospective cross-sectional study design was conducted in diabetes follow-up clinics of selected hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia from April to July 2022. Participants All eligible adult patients with diabetes at the selected facilities. Main outcome measures HRQoL was measured using EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) and the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scales (EQ-VAS) instruments. A lower EQ-5D-5L utility mean score for each dimension and/or an overall lower utility score of EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores are intended to show poor HRQoL. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the association of HRQoL and other variables. Results Out of the 422 samples approached, 402 (95.3%) participated in the study. Most of the participants (>85%) reported having moderate-to-severe problems in all five EQ dimensions. The overall EQ-5D-5L utility and EQ-VAS scores were 0.56 (±0.11) and 56.7 (±10.1), respectively. A higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), a higher number of medications (p = 0.037), a high level of blood glucose (p < 0.001), the presence of comorbidities and/or complications (p = 0.031), hypoglycaemia (p = 0.043) and taking insulin (p < 0.001) were associated with worsened HRQoL, whereas practicing self-monitoring of blood glucose (p = 0.002) and taking aspirin (p = 0.008) had a significant association with increased HRQoL. Conclusion This study concluded that the HRQoL of patients was compromised in all five measuring dimensions. The EQ-5D-5L utility and EQ-VAS scores were far lower than other findings. Clinical and medication-related variables, such as a higher BMI, a higher number of medications, the presence of comorbidities and/or complications, hypoglycaemia and insulin use were associated with poor HRQoL in patients with diabetes. As a result, interventions should be individualised and focused on determinant factors.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and economic impact of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among patients admitted to the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH). Design and setting A prospective nested case–control study was conducted at the UoGCSH among admitted adult patients with (cases) and without ADRs (controls) between May and October 2022. Participants All eligible adult patients admitted in the medical ward of the UoGCSH during the study period were included in this study. Main outcome measures The outcome variables were the clinical and economic outcomes. Length of hospital stay, visits to intensive care units (ICU) and in-hospital mortality were used to measure and compare clinical outcomes in patients with and without ADRs. The economic outcome was also assessed using direct medical-related costs and compared for the two groups. Paired samples t-test and McNemar tests were used to compare measurable outcomes between the two groups. A p value <0.05 at the 95% CI was considered statistically significant. Results Out of a total of 214 eligible enrolled patients, 206 (103 with and 103 without ADRs) with a 96.3% response rate were included in the cohort. The length of hospital stay was much longer in patients with ADRs than without ADRs (19.8 vs 15.2 days, p<0.001). Similarly, ICU visits (11.2% vs 6.8%, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (4.4% vs 1.9%, p=0.012) were significantly higher in patients with ADRs compared with those without ADRs. Patients with ADRs were significantly charged with higher direct medical costs compared with those without ADRs (6237.2 vs 5256.3 Ethiopian birr; p<0.001). Conclusion This study concluded that ADRs had a significant impact on patients’ clinical and medical costs. Healthcare providers should strictly follow the patients to minimise ADR-related clinical and economic adverse outcomes.