Niranjan Karnik

Dr. Niranjan Karnik


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 November 2011 in Child Psychiatry & Human Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JEJennifer P. Edidin
Jennifer P. Edidin
ZGZoe Ganim
Zoe Ganim
SHScott J. Hunter
Scott J. Hunter
NKNiranjan Karnik
Niranjan Karnik

2 April 2009 in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJulia Huemer
Julia Huemer
NKNiranjan Karnik
Niranjan Karnik
SVSabine Voelkl-Kernstock
Sabine Voelkl-Kernstock
EGElisabeth Granditsch
Elisabeth Granditsch
KDKanita Dervic
Kanita Dervic
HSHans Steiner
Hans Steiner
Previous studies about unaccompanied refugee minors (URMs) showed that they are a highly vulnerable group who have greater psychiatric morbidity than the general population. This review focuses on mental health issues among URMs. Articles in databases PsycINFO, Medline and PubMed from 1998 to 2008 addressing this topic were reviewed. The literature had a considerable emphasis on the assessment of PTSD symptoms. Results revealed higher levels of PTSD symptoms in comparison to the norm populations and accompanied refugee minors. In several studies, age and female gender predicted or influenced PTSD symptoms. The existing literature only permits limited conclusions on this very hard to reach population. Future research should include the analysis of long-term outcomes, stress management and a more thorough analysis of the whole range of psychopathology. Additionally, the development of culturally sensitive norms and standardized measures for diverse ethnic groups is of great importance.

27 July 2018 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAlyson K. Zalta
Alyson K. Zalta
PHPhilip Held
Philip Held
DSDale L. Smith
Dale L. Smith
BKBrian J. Klassen
Brian J. Klassen
ALAshton M. Lofgreen
Ashton M. Lofgreen
NKNiranjan Karnik
Niranjan Karnik
Intensive delivery of evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is becoming increasingly popular for overcoming barriers to treatment for veterans. Understanding how and for whom these intensive treatments work is critical for optimizing their dissemination. The goals of the current study were to evaluate patterns of PTSD and depression symptom change over the course of a 3-week cohort-based intensive outpatient program (IOP) for veterans with PTSD, examine changes in posttraumatic cognitions as a predictor of treatment response, and determine whether patterns of treatment outcome or predictors of treatment outcome differed by sex and cohort type (combat versus military sexual trauma [MST]). One-hundred ninety-one veterans (19 cohorts: 12 combat-PTSD cohorts, 7 MST-PTSD cohorts) completed a 3-week intensive outpatient program for PTSD comprised of daily group and individual Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), mindfulness, yoga, and psychoeducation. Measures of PTSD symptoms, depression symptoms, and posttraumatic cognitions were collected before the intervention, after the intervention, and approximately every other day during the intervention. Pre-post analyses for completers (N = 176; 92.1% of sample) revealed large reductions in PTSD (d = 1.12 for past month symptoms and d = 1.40 for past week symptoms) and depression symptoms (d = 1.04 for past 2 weeks). Combat cohorts saw a greater reduction in PTSD symptoms over time relative to MST cohorts. Reduction in posttraumatic cognitions over time significantly predicted decreases in PTSD and depression symptom scores, which remained robust to adjustment for autocorrelation. Intensive treatment programs are a promising approach for delivering evidence-based interventions to produce rapid treatment response and high rates of retention. Reductions in posttraumatic cognitions appear to be an important predictor of response to intensive treatment. Further research is needed to explore differences in intensive treatment response for veterans with combat exposure versus MST.

2 July 2019 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSStephen M Schueller
Stephen M Schueller
AGAngela C Glover
Angela C Glover
ARAnne K Rufa
Anne K Rufa
CDClaire L Dowdle
Claire L Dowdle
GGGregory D Gross
Gregory D Gross
AZAlyson K Zalta
Alyson K Zalta
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Youth homelessness is a substantial issue and many youth experiencing homelessness have mental health issues as both a cause and consequence of homelessness. These youth face many barriers in seeking out traditional mental health services and as a result, few youth experiencing homelessness receive any form of mental health care. Objective: This project aimed to develop and evaluate a technology-based intervention intended to engage young adults experiencing homelessness in a remotely-delivered mental health service and address mental health needs including depression and trauma. We aimed to determine feasibility and acceptability of this intervention by piloting it within a homeless shelter network. Methods: A total of 35 young adults (ages 18-23) experiencing homelessness participated in a single-arm field trial of the intervention. Participants received a mobile phone, a service and data plan, and 1 month of support from a therapist consisting of up to 3 brief phone sessions, text messaging, and mobile mental health applications. We evaluated clinical outcomes at baseline as well as clinical outcomes and satisfaction at the end of the 1-month support period. We used validity items to identify participants who might be responding inappropriately and thus only report clinical outcomes and satisfaction ratings from valid responses. Results: A majority of participants (57%, 20/35) completed all 3 of their phone sessions, with an average of 2.09 sessions (SD = 1.22) completed by each participant. Participants sent an average of 15.06 text messages (SD = 12.62) and received an average of 19.34 (SD = 12.70). We found higher rates of satisfaction among those participants with valid responses including 100% (23/23) of such participants indicating that they would recommend participation to someone else and 52% (12/23) reporting that they were “very” or “extremely” satisfied with their participation. Overall, we found no significant change in clinical outcomes of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or emotion regulation during the intervention period (P’s > .59). The experience of traumatic events during the period appeared to impact symptoms, such that those who did not experience traumatic events had larger decreases in PTSD symptoms, but stable depressive symptoms and slight decreases in emotion regulation. The opposite pattern emerged for those who experienced traumatic events. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that it was feasible to engage homeless young adults in mental health services in this technology-based intervention with high rates of satisfaction, but we did not find changes in clinical outcomes with a very brief intervention. Technology might be an important avenue to reach young adults experiencing homelessness but additional work could explore the proper interventions to deliver with such a platform. Clinical Trial: NCT03620682

16 July 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMajid Afshar
Majid Afshar
CJCara Joyce
Cara Joyce
DDDmitriy Dligach
Dmitriy Dligach
BSBrihat Sharma
Brihat Sharma
RKRobert Kania
Robert Kania
NKNiranjan Karnik
Niranjan Karnik
Approaches are needed to better delineate the continuum of opioid misuse that occurs in hospitalized patients. A prognostic enrichment strategy with latent class analysis (LCA) may facilitate treatment strategies in subtypes of opioid misuse. We aim to identify subtypes of patients with opioid misuse and examine the distinctions between the subtypes by examining patient characteristics, topic models from clinical notes, and clinical outcomes. This was an observational study of inpatient hospitalizations at a tertiary care center between 2007 and 2017. Patients with opioid misuse were identified using an operational definition applied to all inpatient encounters. LCA with eight class-defining variables from the electronic health record (EHR) was applied to identify subtypes in the cohort of patients with opioid misuse. Comparisons between subtypes were made using the following approaches: (1) descriptive statistics on patient characteristics and healthcare utilization using EHR data and census-level data; (2) topic models with natural language processing (NLP) from clinical notes; (3) association with hospital outcomes. The analysis cohort was 6,224 (2.7% of all hospitalizations) patient encounters with opioid misuse with a data corpus of 422,147 clinical notes. LCA identified four subtypes with differing patient characteristics, topics from the clinical notes, and hospital outcomes. Class 1 was categorized by high hospital utilization with known opioid-related conditions (36.5%); Class 2 included patients with illicit use, low socioeconomic status, and psychoses (12.8%); Class 3 contained patients with alcohol use disorders with complications (39.2%); and class 4 consisted of those with low hospital utilization and incidental opioid misuse (11.5%). The following hospital outcomes were the highest for each subtype when compared against the other subtypes: readmission for class 1 (13.9% vs. 10.5%, p<0.01); discharge against medical advice for class 2 (12.3% vs. 5.3%, p<0.01); and in-hospital death for classes 3 and 4 (3.2% vs. 1.9%, p<0.01). A 4-class latent model was the most parsimonious model that defined clinically interpretable and relevant subtypes for opioid misuse. Distinct subtypes were delineated after examining multiple domains of EHR data and applying methods in artificial intelligence. The approach with LCA and readily available class-defining substance use variables from the EHR may be applied as a prognostic enrichment strategy for targeted interventions.

1 May 2017 in Psychological Services
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAElizabeth C. Adkins
Elizabeth C. Adkins
AZAlyson K. Zalta
Alyson K. Zalta
RBRandy A. Boley
Randy A. Boley
AGAngela Glover
Angela Glover
NKNiranjan Karnik
Niranjan Karnik
SSStephen M. Schueller
Stephen M. Schueller
Homelessness has serious consequences for youth that heighten the need for mental health services; however, these individuals face significant barriers to access. New models of intervention delivery are required to improve the dissemination of mental health interventions that tailor these services to the unique challenges faced by homeless youth. The purpose of this study was to better understand homeless youths' use of technology, mental health experiences and needs, and willingness to engage with technology-supported mental health interventions to help guide the development of future youth-facing technology-supported interventions. Five focus groups were conducted with 24 homeless youth (62.5% female) in an urban shelter. Youth were 18- to 20-years-old with current periods of homelessness ranging from 6 days to 4 years. Transcripts of these focus groups were coded to identify themes. Homeless youth reported using mobile phones frequently for communication, music, and social media. They indicated a lack of trust and a history of poor relationships with mental health providers despite recognizing the need for general support as well as help for specific mental health problems. Although initial feelings toward technology that share information with a provider were mixed, they reported an acceptance of tracking and sharing information under certain circumstances. Based on these results, we provide recommendations for the development of mental health interventions for this population focusing on technology-based treatment options. (PsycINFO Database Record