Federico Barnabè

Prof. Dr. Federico Barnabè

Dipartimento di Studi Aziendali e Giuridici, Università degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Tuscany, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2021 in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Federico BarnabèFederico Barnabè
Federico Barnabè
SARFRAZ NAZIRSARFRAZ NAZIR
SARFRAZ NAZIR
This study investigates how companies can conceptualize and enable circular economy (CE) principles and opportunities through integrated reporting (IR) practices and, specifically, the principle of integrated thinking (IT). To this aim, the study carries out an interventionist research‐based case study about a small‐sized agri‐food company and applies Systems Thinking tools (namely a sub‐system diagram and a stock and flow diagram). The findings demonstrate that IR concepts played a performative role, favoring a better understanding of the business domain and of CE‐related activities and opportunities, also in the perspective of developing future strategies. Overall, the research suggests that IR and CE may be jointly used but more research and emphasis on the principle of IT, particularly to facilitate decision‐making, are recommended.

3 May 2019 in Journal of Management and Governance
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Federico BarnabèFederico Barnabè
Federico Barnabè
MGMaria Cleofe Giorgino
Maria Cleofe Giorgino
Martin KuncMartin Kunc
Martin Kunc

12 June 2017 in The TQM Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Federico BarnabèFederico Barnabè
Federico Barnabè
MGMaria Cleofe Giorgino
Maria Cleofe Giorgino
Purpose This paper builds on the debate regarding the application of Lean strategy principles and tools in modern organizations, specifically focusing on the healthcare (HC) sector. The purpose of this paper is threefold: first, to highlight the potential role played by Lean strategy tools for strategic planning and management, particularly in reference to the Hoshin Kanri policy deployment system and the “focus, alignment, integration, and review” (FAIR) method; second, to discuss how Lean strategy can be operationalized, specifically relying on the X-Matrix reporting tool; and third, to explore how simulation techniques, in the form of role-playing (RP), may support the aforementioned operationalization of Lean strategy while at the same time promoting policymaking and knowledge sharing. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts a case study approach. Specifically, the paper relies on the use of a RP Lean strategy project developed in a HC setting. Findings The paper highlights the potential for the Hoshin Kanri policy deployment process in HC, also emphasizing the main strengths of X-Matrix reporting and the usefulness of the RP technique to support learning acquisition and decision making. Practical implications The paper demonstrates how a Lean strategy simulation project may be effectively used for strategic planning/management and to train professionals in HC. To achieve these aims, a methodology to design and implement simulation-based Lean strategy projects in HC is presented and discussed. Originality/value A review of the academic literature indicates that Lean strategy is still an emerging research topic addressed by only a limited number of articles. The paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the fundamentals of Lean strategy (particularly Hoshin Kanri and X-Matrix) with particular reference to the HC sector.

26 November 2017 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMaria Cleofe Giorgino
Maria Cleofe Giorgino
ESEnrico Supino
Enrico Supino
Federico BarnabèFederico Barnabè
Federico Barnabè
Within the extensive literature investigating the impacts of corporate disclosure in supporting the sustainable growth of an organization, few studies have included in the analysis the materiality issue referred to the information being disclosed. This article aims to address this gap, exploring the effect produced on capital markets by the publication of a recent corporate reporting tool, Integrated Report (IR). The features of this tool are that it aims to represent the multidimensional impact of the organization’s activity and assumes materiality as a guiding principle of the report drafting. Adopting the event study methodology associated with a statistical significance test for categorical data, our results verify that an organization’s release of IR is able to produce a statistically significant impact on the related share prices. Moreover, the term “integrated” assigned to the reports plays a significant role in the impact on capital markets. Our findings have beneficial implications for both researchers and practitioners, adding new evidence for the IR usefulness as a corporate disclosure tool and the effect of an organization’s decision to disclose material information.

11 July 2019 in Systems Research and Behavioral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMaria Cleofe Giorgino
Maria Cleofe Giorgino
Federico BarnabèFederico Barnabè
Federico Barnabè
Martin KuncMartin Kunc
Martin Kunc
The article explores the role of qualitative system dynamics (SD) in evaluating the information presented in corporate accounting reports. Particularly, this study focuses on a recent corporate report called integrated reporting (), and analyses the information using a specific qualitative SD technique, resource mapping, in order to visualize the key resources and their connections responsible for the performance of the organization. The study'; contribution is twofold. First, it provides insights on how to apply qualitative SD in the field of management accounting and corporate reporting. Second, it verifies the benefits of combining qualitative SD and corporate reporting tools to develop new knowledge useful to represent and face the dynamic complexity implicit in a business domain.

26 March 2018 in Journal of Health Organization and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Federico BarnabèFederico Barnabè
Federico Barnabè
MGMaria Cleofe Giorgino
Maria Cleofe Giorgino
JGJacopo Guercini
Jacopo Guercini
CBCaterina Bianciardi
Caterina Bianciardi
VMVincenzo Mezzatesta
Vincenzo Mezzatesta
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potentials of role-playing (RP) both in training healthcare (HC) professionals to implement tools and improvement actions based on Lean principles, and in supporting group discussion and the sharing of different competencies for the development of Lean HC. Design/methodology/approach: The paper presents the case study of an RP simulation called LEAN HEALTHCARE LAB, which is used to train HC professionals at Siena University Hospital. The paper reports and discusses the results of a specific two-day simulation session and of a questionnaire that was distributed to gather feedback from the participants. Findings: The paper verifies the potentials of RP to be a powerful educational and training tool that is able to stimulate the HC participants to apply Lean thinking principles and share their competencies in collaborative decision-making processes. Research limitations/implications: The study provides data in reference to one single simulation session, although the game has already been applied several times in different HC organizations with very similar outcomes. Moreover, a more in-depth analysis of players’ perceptions and decisions could be performed using different tools in addition to the adopted questionnaire. Practical implications: RP games (RPGs) are effective training and educational tools for HC professionals. They offer benefits and learning conditions which are definitely different if compared with more conventional education programs for HC professionals. Originality/value: While previous studies have extensively discussed the potentialities of RPG and simulations in training programs, only a few articles have discussed the RP adoption for Lean thinking and even less to educate HC professionals on Lean principles and tools.