Necroptosis is a new type of programmed cell death and involves the occurrence and development of various cancers. Moreover, the aberrantly expressed lncRNA can also affect tumorigenesis, migration, and invasion. However, there are few types of research on the necroptosis-related lncRNA (NRL), especially in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC). In this study, we analyzed the sequencing data obtained from the TGCA-KIRC dataset, then applied the LASSO and COX analysis to identify 6 NRLs (AC124854.1, AL117336.1, DLGAP1-AS2, EPB41L4A-DT, HOXA-AS2, and LINC02100) to construct a risk model. Patients suffering from KIRC were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the risk score, and the patients in the low-risk group had a longer OS. This signature can be used as an indicator to predict the prognosis of KIRC independent of other clinicopathological features. In addition, the gene set enrichment analysis showed that some tumor and immune-associated pathways were more enriched in a high-risk group. We also found significant differences between the high and low-risk groups in the infiltrating immune cells, immune functions, and expression of immune checkpoint molecules. Finally, we use the “pRRophetic” package to complete the drug sensitivity prediction, and the risk score could reflect patients’ response to 8 small molecule compounds. In general, NRLs divided KIRC into two subtypes with different risk scores. Furthermore, this signature based on the 6 NRLs could provide a promising method to predict the prognosis and immune response of KIRC patients. To some extent, our findings helped give a reference for further research between NRLs and KIRC and find more effective therapeutic drugs for KIRC.

Background: Immunodeficiency diseases (IDDs) are associated with an increased proportion of cancer-related morbidity. However, the relationship between IDDs and malignancy readmissions has not been well described. Understanding this relationship could help us to develop a more reasonable discharge plan in the special tumor population. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we established a retrospective cohort study that included patients with the 16 most common malignancies, and we defined two groups: non-immunodeficiency diseases (NOIDDs) and IDDs. Results: To identify whether the presence or absence of IDDs was associated with readmission, we identified 603,831 patients with malignancies at their time of readmission in which 0.8% had IDDs and in which readmission occurred in 47.3%. Compared with NOIDDs, patients with IDDs had a higher risk of 30-day (hazard ratio (HR) of 1.32; 95% CI of 1.25–1.40), 90-day (HR of 1.27; 95% CI of 1.21–1.34) and 180-day readmission (HR of 1.28; 95% CI of 1.22–1.35). More than one third (37.9%) of patients with IDDs had readmissions that occurred within 30 days and most (82.4%) of them were UPRs. An IDD was an independent risk factor for readmission in patients with colorectal cancer (HR of 1.32; 95% CI of 1.01–1.72), lung cancer (HR of 1.23; 95% CI of 1.02–1.48), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) (HR of 1.16; 95% CI of 1.04–1.28), prostate cancer (HR of 1.45; 95% CI of 1.07–1.96) or stomach cancer (HR of 2.34; 95% CI of 1.33–4.14). Anemia (44.2%), bacterial infections (28.6%) and pneumonia (13.9%) were the 30-day UPR causes in these populations. (4) Conclusions: IDDs were independently associated with higher readmission risks for some malignant tumors. Strategies should be considered to prevent the causes of readmission as a post discharge plan.