We analyzed the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) over the past 2 decades. Between 1992 and 2009, 953 patients were treated with HSCT, mainly for a hematologic malignancy. They were divided according to 4 different time periods of treatment: 1992 to 1995, 1996 to 2000, 2001 to 2005, and 2006 to 2009. Over the years, many factors have changed considerably regarding patient age, diagnosis, disease stage, type of donor, stem cell source, genomic HLA typing, cell dose, type of conditioning, treatment of infections, use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), use of mesenchymal stem cells, use of cytotoxic T cells, and home care. When we compared the last period (2006-2009) with earlier periods, we found slower neutrophil engraftment, a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) of grades II-IV, and less chronic GVHD (cGHVD). The incidence of relapse was unchanged over the 4 periods (22%-25%). Overall survival (OS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) improved significantly in the more recent periods, with the best results during the last period (2006-2009) and a 100-day TRM of 5.5%. This improvement was also apparent in a multivariate analysis. When correcting for differences between the 4 groups, the hazard ratio for mortality in the last period was 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.79; P < .001) and for TRM it was 0.63 (CI: 0.43-0.92; P = .02). This study shows that the combined efforts to improve outcome after HSCT have been very effective. Even though we now treat older patients with more advanced disease and use more alternative HLA nonidentical donors, OS and TRM have improved. The problem of relapse still has to be remedied. Thus, several different developments together have resulted in significantly lower TRM and improved survival after HSCT over the last few years.

During more recent years only few studies have analyzed the effect of total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD34(+) cell dose in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A single-center analysis included 544 patients, 227 with a sibling donor and 317 with an unrelated donor. Most patients (n = 292) were treated with myeloablative conditioning, whereas the remaining patients (n = 252) received reduced-intensity conditioning. Bone marrow (BM) (n = 121) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts (n = 423) were analyzed separately. Median TNC and CD34(+) cell dose was 3.2 × 10(8)/kg versus 11.6 × 10(8)/kg in BM and 3.9 × 10(6)/kg versus 8.1 × 10(6)/kg in PBSC. In the BM group we found a higher TNC and CD34(+) cell dose was associated with a faster neutrophil engraftment (P < .001 and P = .02). In the PBSC group we found patients given a very high (≥11 × 10(6)/kg) CD34(+) cell dose had decreased rates of survival (P = .001) and increased relapse (P = .02). A high CD34(+) cell dose correlated with faster platelet engraftment (P < .01). In HSCT using PBSCs, the CD34(+) cell doses should be kept below 11 × 10(6)/kg but over 2.5 × 10(6)/kg.

Two hundred twenty-four patients with leukemia transplanted with an unrelated donor between 1991 and 2003 at the Karolinska University Hospital were analyzed according to association between graft failure and ABO, RhD, MNSs, and Kidd blood group antigen compatibility. Median age was 29 years (range: 0-55). Conditioning consisted of total-body irradiation or busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning. A bone marrow graft was given to 152 patients, and 72 patients received peripheral blood stem cells. Most patients received graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with cyclosporine and MTX. Graft failure (GF) was seen in 6 (2.7%) patients. In the multivariate analysis major ABO mismatch (odds ratio [OR] 14.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-110, P = .008) and HLA-allele mismatch (6.42, 1.19-34.8, P = .03) was significantly associated to GF. In patients with and without major ABO mismatch the incidence of GF was 7.5% and 0.6% (P = .02), respectively. Using an ABO major mismatched graft increases the risk for GF after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is a promising graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in haploidentical and matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but its role in matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of 413 MSD-HSCT patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts from January 2010 to January 2023. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: group I (calcineurin inhibitor [CNI] + methotrexate [MTX] or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]), group II (CNI + MTX or MMF + antithymocyte globulin [ATG]), group III (PTCy + ATG + CNI), and group IV (PTCy + CNI + MMF). PTCy was associated with a significant reduction in grade 2- 4 and grade 3-4 acute GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD compared with CNI + MTX (or MMF)–containing regimens. PTCy did not increase relapse risk; PTCy reduced nonrelapse mortality, leading to improved GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS; Hazard Ratio, 0.4; P < .001). PTCy was also associated with improved overall survival. Bloodstream infections were increased with PTCy. The addition of ATG to PTCy did not further improve GRFS and was associated with a higher incidence of clinically significant cytomegalovirus (csCMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (csEBV) reactivation and a numerical increase in NRM. PTCy significantly appeared to improve GRFS in the MSD setting using PBSC grafts. The addition of ATG to PTCy increases csCMV and csEBV reactivation without further improving GRFS. Prospective trials and PTCy dose optimization are warranted.

This study investigated the single-center incidence and risk factors for bloodstream infections (BSIs) in 651 adults who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) between 2015 and 2019 and explored the impact of these BSIs on post-transplantation outcomes. Antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was given during the aplastic phase. Overall, the median patient age was 57 years, 79.7% of patients received an alternative donor graft, and 68.7% received post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as part of their graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Of the 651 patients, 358 (55.0%) had at least 1 episode of BSI, and the overall mortality rate secondary to this complication was 7.5% (12.6% among those diagnosed with at least 1 episode of BSI). BSI was more often diagnosed during the first 30 days (58.7%), and gram-positive bacteria were the most prevalent microorganisms isolated during the entire post-transplantation follow-up (62%). A high Disease Risk Index (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; P < .029) and receipt of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis (HR, 3.33; P < .001) were identified as risk factors for BSI. Additionally, univariate analysis showed that patients diagnosed with a BSI during post-transplantation follow-up had worse overall survival (HR, 2.48; P < .001) and higher nonrelapse mortality (HR, 2.68; P < .001) than those without BSI. In conclusion, alloHCT recipients with a BSI had a higher risk of mortality compared with those who did not develop BSI. The inclusion of PTCy as part of GVHD prophylaxis was identified as an independent risk factor for BSI during early post-transplantation follow-up. Single-center analyses focused on reporting the incidence and risk factors for BSI highlight the need for active implementation of preemptive strategies to decrease BSI incidence in the alloHCT setting. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.