Margaret R. Slater

Dr. Margaret R. Slater


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2008 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMargaret R. Slater
Margaret R. Slater
ANAntonio Di Nardo
Antonio Di Nardo
OPOmbretta Pediconi
Ombretta Pediconi
PVPaolo Dalla Villa
Paolo Dalla Villa
LCLuca Candeloro
Luca Candeloro
SPStefania Del Papa
Stefania Del Papa

1 March 2001 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMargaret R. Slater
Margaret R. Slater

1 April 2008 in Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMargaret R. Slater
Margaret R. Slater
ANAntonio Di Nardo
Antonio Di Nardo
OPOmbretta Pediconi
Ombretta Pediconi
PVPaolo Dalla Villa
Paolo Dalla Villa
LCLuca Candeloro
Luca Candeloro
SPStefania Del Papa
Stefania Del Papa

8 July 2014 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEmily Weiss
Emily Weiss
MSMargaret R. Slater
Margaret R. Slater
LGLaurie Garrison
Laurie Garrison
NDNatasha Drain
Natasha Drain
EDEmily Dolan
Emily Dolan
SZStephen L. Zawistowski
Stephen L. Zawistowski
While the overall trend in euthanasia has been decreasing nationally, large dogs are at a higher risk of euthanasia than other sized dogs in most animal shelters in the United States. We hypothesized one way to increase the lives saved with respect to these large dogs is to keep them home when possible. In order to develop solutions to decrease relinquishment, a survey was developed to learn more about the reasons owners relinquish large dogs. The survey was administered to owners relinquishing their dogs at two large municipal facilities, one in New York City and one in Washington, D.C. There were 157 responses between the two facilities. We found both significant similarities and differences between respondents and their dogs from the two cities. We identified opportunities to potentially support future relinquishers and found that targets for interventions are likely different in each community.

1 January 2002 in Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKathy L. Hughes
Kathy L. Hughes
MSMargaret R. Slater
Margaret R. Slater
In August 1998, Texas AM University implemented on campus a trap-test-vaccinate-alter-return-monitor (TTVARM) program to manage the feral cat population. TTVARM is an internationally recognized term for trapping and neutering programs aimed at management of feral cat populations. In this article we summarize results of the program for the period August 1998 to July 2000. In surgery laboratories, senior veterinary students examined cats that were humanely trapped once a month and tested them for feline leukemia and feline immunodeficiency virus infections, vaccinated, and surgically neutered them. They euthanized cats testing positive for either infectious disease. Volunteers provided food and observed the cats that were returned to their capture sites on campus and maintained in managed colonies. The program placed kittens and tame cats for adoption; cats totaled 158. Of the majority of 158 captured cats, there were less kittens caught in Year 2 than in Year 1. The proportion of tame cats trapped was significantly greater in Year 2 than in Year 1. The prevalence found for feline leukemia and feline immunodeficiency virus ELISA test positives was 5.8% and 6.5%, respectively. Following surgery, 101 cats returned to campus. The project recaptured, retested, and revaccinated more than one-fourth of the cats due for their annual vaccinations. The program placed 32 kittens, juveniles, and tame adults for adoption. The number of cat complaints received by the university's pest control service decreased from Year 1 to Year 2.

10 December 2015 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EDEmily Dolan
Emily Dolan
JSJamie Scotto
Jamie Scotto
MSMargaret R. Slater
Margaret R. Slater
EWEmily Weiss
Emily Weiss
Dog relinquishment is a large component of shelter intake in the United States. Research has shown traits of the dog are associated with relinquishment as well as general characteristics of those relinquishing. Low income is often cited as a risk factor for relinquishment. The majority of people with lower incomes, however, do not relinquish. A group of people accessing a shelter in a low socioeconomic region of Los Angeles to relinquish their dogs was surveyed. This study examined risk factors for relinquishment, controlling for household income, compared to a group utilizing low cost spay/neuter services. A total of 76.9% of those relinquishing noted cost as a reason for relinquishment. Of participants in the relinquishment group, 80.7% reported not being aware of any services available to them. Most notable in the findings was that the odds of relinquishment were generally higher as the amount of perceived stress in the home in the past three months increased. The majority of people in both groups reported being emotionally attached to the dog. In this sample from a South Los Angeles community, the majority of reasons for relinquishment were likely solvable with assistance. These findings highlight an opportunity to assess community needs and provide community specific alternatives to relinquishment.