Matthew Reed

Prof. Matthew Reed

University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2014 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XSXiangnan Shi
Xiangnan Shi
LCLibo Cao
Libo Cao
Matthew ReedMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
JRJonathan Rupp
Jonathan Rupp
CHCarrie N. Hoff
Carrie N. Hoff
JHJingwen Hu
Jingwen Hu

1 November 2014 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPatrick M. Carter
Patrick M. Carter
CFCarol A.C. Flannagan
Carol A.C. Flannagan
Matthew ReedMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
RCRebecca M. Cunningham
Rebecca M. Cunningham
JRJonathan Rupp
Jonathan Rupp

1 December 2002 in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matthew ReedMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
MMMiriam A. Manary
Miriam A. Manary
CFCarol A. C. Flannagan
Carol A. C. Flannagan
LSLawrence W. Schneider
Lawrence W. Schneider
A new model for predicting automobile driving posture is presented. The model, based on data from a study of 68 men and women in 18 vehicle package and seat conditions, is designed for use in posturing the human figure models that are increasingly used for vehicle interior design. The model uses a series of independent regression models, coupled with data-guided inverse kinematics, to fit a whole-body linkage. An important characteristic of the new model is that it places greatest importance on prediction accuracy for the body locations that are most important for vehicle interior design: eye location and hip location. The model predictions were compared with the driving postures of 120 men and women in five vehicles. Errors in mean eye location predictions in the vehicles were typically less than 10 mm. Prediction errors were largely independent of anthropometric variables and vehicle layout. Although the average posture of a group of people can be predicted accurately, individuals' postures cannot be predicted precisely because of interindividual posture variance that is unrelated to key anthropometric variables. The posture prediction models developed in this research can be applied to posturing computer-rendered human models to improve the accuracy of ergonomic assessments of vehicle interiors.

18 May 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhigang Li
Zhigang Li
BPByoung-Keon Park
Byoung-Keon Park
WLWeiguo Liu
Weiguo Liu
JZJinhuan Zhang
Jinhuan Zhang
Matthew ReedMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
JHJingwen Hu
Jingwen Hu
Head injury is the leading cause of fatality and long-term disability for children. Pediatric heads change rapidly in both size and shape during growth, especially for children under 3 years old (YO). To accurately assess the head injury risks for children, it is necessary to understand the geometry of the pediatric head and how morphologic features influence injury causation within the 0–3 YO population. In this study, head CT scans from fifty-six 0–3 YO children were used to develop a statistical model of pediatric skull geometry. Geometric features important for injury prediction, including skull size and shape, skull thickness and suture width, along with their variations among the sample population, were quantified through a series of image and statistical analyses. The size and shape of the pediatric skull change significantly with age and head circumference. The skull thickness and suture width vary with age, head circumference and location, which will have important effects on skull stiffness and injury prediction. The statistical geometry model developed in this study can provide a geometrical basis for future development of child anthropomorphic test devices and pediatric head finite element models.

24 September 2011 in Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZLZhigang Li
Zhigang Li
JHJingwen Hu
Jingwen Hu
Matthew ReedMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
JRJonathan Rupp
Jonathan Rupp
CHCarrie N. Hoff
Carrie N. Hoff
BCBo Cheng
Bo Cheng

1 December 2000 in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Matthew ReedMatthew Reed
Matthew Reed
MMMiriam A. Manary
Miriam A. Manary
CFCarol A. C. Flannagan
Carol A. C. Flannagan
LSLawrence W. Schneider
Lawrence W. Schneider
The effects of vehicle package, seat, and anthropometric variables on posture were studied in a laboratory vehicle mockup. Participants (68 men and women) selected their preferred driving postures in 18 combinations of seat height, fore-aft steering wheel position, and seat cushion angle. Two seats differing in stiffness and seat back contour were used in testing. Driving postures were recorded using a sonic digitizer to measure the 3D locations of body landmarks. All test variables had significant independent effects on driving posture. Drivers were found to adapt to changes in the vehicle geometry primarily by changes in limb posture, whereas torso posture remained relatively constant. Stature accounts for most of the anthropometrically related variability in driving posture, and gender differences appear to be explained by body size variation. Large intersubject differences in torso posture, which are fairly stable across different seat and package conditions, are not closely related to standard anthropometric measures. The findings can be used to predict the effects of changes in vehicle and seat design on driving postures for populations with a wide range of anthropometric characteristics.