Background: Chondrosarcoma is the most common primary bone sarcoma among elderly population. This study aims to explore independent prognostic factors and develop prediction model in elderly patients with CHS.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of elderly patients diagnosed as CHS between 2004 and 2018 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We randomly divided enrolled patients into training and validation group, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors. Based on the identified variables, the nomogram was developed and verified to predict the 12-, 24-, and 36-month overall survival (OS) of elderly patients with CHS. A k-fold cross-validation method (k=10) was performed to validate the newly proposed model. The discrimination, calibration and clinical utility of the nomogram were assessed using the Harrells concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI). Furthermore, a web-based survival calculator was developed based on the nomogram.Results: The study finally included 595 elderly patients with CHS and randomized them into the training group (419 cases) and validation group (176 cases) at a ratio of 7:3. Age, sex, grade, histology, M stage, surgery and tumor size were identified as independent prognostic factors of this population. The novel nomogram displayed excellent predictive performance, which can be accessible by https://nomoresearch.shinyapps.io/elderlywithCHS/, with a C-index of 0.800 for the training group and 0.789 for the validation group. The value AUC values at 12-, 24-, and 36-month of 0.866, 0.855, and 0.860 in the training group and of 0.839, 0.856, and 0.840 in the validation group, respectively. The calibration curves exhibited good concordance from the predicted survival probabilities to actual observation. The ROC curves, IDI, NRI, and DCA showed the nomogram was superior to the existing AJCC staging system.Conclusion: This study developed a novel web-based nomogram for accurately predicting probabilities of OS in elderly patients with CHS, which will contribute to personalized survival assessment and clinical management for elderly patients with CHS.

Background. Primary osseous spinal neoplasms (POSNs) are the rarest tumor type in the spine. Very few studies have presented data on elderly patients with POSNs specifically. The present study was aimed at exploring the prognostic factors and developing two web-based nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for this population. Method. The data of elderly patients with POSNs was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS, these prognostic factors were incorporated to establish nomograms. The discrimination of the nomograms was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the value of area under the curve (AUC). Calibration curve was plotted to assess the predictive accuracy of model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to determine the net clinical benefit. Furthermore, two web-based survival rate calculators were developed. Result. A total of 430 patients were finally selected into this study and were randomly assigned to the training set (302 cases) and validation set (128 cases). Of these, 289 patients were further considered for the analysis of CSS and were randomized into training set (205 cases) and validation set (84 cases). Based on the results of univariate and multivariate Cox analyses, variables that significantly correlated with survival outcomes were used to establish nomograms for OS and CSS prediction. Two established nomograms demonstrated good predictive performance. In the training set, the AUCs of the nomogram for predicting 12-, 24-, and 36-month OS were 0.849, 0.903, and 0.889, respectively, and those for predicting 12-, 24-, and 36-month CSS were 0.890, 0.880, and 0.881, respectively. Two web-based survival rate calculators were developed to estimate OS (https://research1.shinyapps.io/DynNomappOS/) and CSS (https://research1.shinyapps.io/DynNomappCSS/). Conclusion. Novel nomograms based on identified clinicopathological factors were developed and can be used as a tool for clinicians to predict OS and CSS in elderly patients with POSNs. These models could help facilitate a personalized survival evaluation for this population.

Background: Elderly people are at high risk of metastatic kidney cancer (KC), and, the bone is one of the most common metastatic sites for metastatic KC. However, studies on diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for bone metastases (BM) in elderly KC patients are still vacant. Therefore, it is necessary to establish new diagnostic and prognostic nomograms.Methods: We downloaded the data of all KC patients aged more than 65 years during 2010–2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to study independent risk factors of BM in elderly KC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for the study of independent prognostic factors in elderly KCBM patients. Survival differences were studied using Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival analysis. The predictive efficacy and clinical utility of nomograms were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: A final total of 17,404 elderly KC patients (training set: n = 12,184, validation set: n = 5,220) were included to study the risk of BM. 394 elderly KCBM patients (training set: n = 278, validation set: n = 116) were included to study the overall survival (OS). Age, histological type, tumor size, grade, T/N stage and brain/liver/lung metastasis were identified as independent risk factors for developing BM in elderly KC patients. Surgery, lung/liver metastasis and T stage were identified as independent prognostic factors in elderly KCBM patients. The diagnostic nomogram had AUCs of 0.859 and 0.850 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the prognostic nomogram in predicting OS at 12, 24 and 36 months were: training set (0.742, 0.775, 0.787), and validation set (0.721, 0.827, 0.799), respectively. The calibration curve and DCA also showed excellent clinical utility of the two nomograms.Conclusion: Two new nomograms were constructed and validated to predict the risk of developing BM in elderly KC patients and 12-, 24-, and 36-months OS in elderly KCBM patients. These models can help surgeons provide more comprehensive and personalized clinical management programs for this population.

The implementation of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the treatment of kidney cancer patients (KC) with bone metastases (BM) has been controversial. This study aims to construct the first tool that can accurately predict the likelihood of PTR benefit in KC patients with BM (KCBM) and select the optimal surgical candidates. This study acquired data on all patients diagnosed with KCBM during 2010–2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to achieve balanced matching of PTR and non-PTR groups to eliminate selection bias and confounding factors. The median overall survival (OS) of the non-PTR group was used as the threshold to categorize the PTR group into PTR-beneficial and PTR-Nonbeneficial subgroups. Kaplan–Meier (K–M) survival analysis was used for comparison of survival differences and median OS between groups. Risk factors associated with PTR-beneficial were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to validate the predictive performance and clinical utility of the nomogram. Ultimately, 1963 KCBM patients meeting screening criteria were recruited. Of these, 962 patients received PTR and the remaining 1061 patients did not receive PTR. After 1:1 PSM, there were 308 patients in both PTR and non-PTR groups. The K–M survival analysis results showed noteworthy survival disparities between PTR and non-PTR groups, both before and after PSM (p < 0.001). In the logistic regression results of the PTR group, histological type, T/N stage and lung metastasis were shown to be independent risk factors associated with PTR-beneficial. The web-based nomogram allows clinicians to enter risk variables directly and quickly obtain PTR beneficial probabilities. The validation results showed the excellent predictive performance and clinical utility of the nomograms for accurate screening of optimal surgical candidates for KCBM. This study constructed an easy-to-use nomogram based on conventional clinicopathologic variables to accurately select the optimal surgical candidates for KCBM patients.