Implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) from the left pectoral region is the standard therapeutical method. Increasing numbers of system revisions due to lead dysfunction and infections will consecutively increase the numbers of right-sided implantations. The reliability of devices implanted on the right pectoral side remains controversially discussed, and the question of testing these devices remains unanswered.

Background: Application of high power radiofrequency (RF) energy for a short duration (HPSD) to isolate pulmonary vein (PV) is an emerging technique. But power and duration settings are very different across different centers. Moreover, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical data, studies measuring acute effectiveness of various HPSD settings are limited. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) were treated with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using HPSD. PVI was performed with a contact force catheter (Thermocool SF Smart-Touch) and Carto 3 System. The following parameters were used: energy output 50 W, target temperature 43 degrees C, irrigation 15 mL/min, targeted contact force of > 10 g. RF energy was applied for 6-10 s. Required minimal interlesion distance was 4 mm. Twenty minutes after each successful PVI adenosine provocation test (APT) was performed by administrating 18 mg adenosine to unmask dormant PV conduction. Results: All PVs (100 PVs) were successfully isolated. RF lesions needed per patient were 131 +/- 41, the average duration for each RF application was 8.1 +/- 1.7 s. Procedure time was 138 +/- 21 min and average of total RF energy duration was 16.3 +/- 5.2 min and average amount of RF energy was 48209 +/- +/- 12808 W. APT application time after PVI was 31.1 +/- 8.3 min for the left sided PVs and 22.2 +/- +/- 4.6 min (p = 0.005) for the right sided PVs. APT was transiently positive in 18 PVs (18%) in 8 (32%) patients. Conclusions: Pulmonary vein isolation with high power for 6-10 s is feasible and shortens the procedure and ablation duration. However, acute effectiveness of the HPSD seems to be lower than expected. Further studies combining other ablation parameters are needed to improve this promising technique.

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) is the most widely used prognostic marker in cardiovascular diseases. LV global function index (LVGFI) is a novel marker which incorporates the total LV structure in the assessment of LV cardiac performance. We evaluated the prognostic significance of LVGFI, measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in predicting mortality and ICD therapies in a real-world (ICD) population with secondary ICD prevention indication, to detect a high-risk group among these patients. In total, 105 patients with cardiac MRI prior to the ICD implantation were included (mean age 56 ± 16 years old; 76% male). Using the MRI data for each patient LVGFI was determined and a cut-off for the LVGFI value was calculated. Patients were followed up every four to six months in our or clinics in proximity. Data on the occurrence of heart failure symptoms and or mortality, as well as device therapies and other vital parameters, were collected. Follow up duration was 37 months in median. The mean LVGFI was 24.5%, the cut off value for LVGFI 13.5%. According to the LVGFI Index patient were divided into 2 groups, 86 patients in the group with the higher LVGFI und 19 patients in the lower group. The LVGFI correlates significantly with the LVEF (r = 0.642, p < 0.001). In Kaplan–Meier analysis, a lower LVGFI ( I, the initial device or a medication (each p = n.s.). Further, in Kaplan–Meier analysis no association was evident between the LVGFI and adequate ICD therapy (p = n.s.). In secondary prevention ICD patients reduced LVGFI was shown as an independent predictor for mortality and rehospitalization, but not for ICD therapies. We were able to identify a high-risk collective among these patients, but further investigation is needed to evaluate LVGFI compared to ejection fraction, especially in patients with an elevated risk for adverse cardiac events.

Background:We recently demonstrated that the acute reconnection rate detected with adenosine provocation test (APT) was significantly lower after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with visually guided laser balloon ablation (VGLB) than with RF ablation (RF). We evaluated the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months after VGLB vs. RF and the significance of APT results for the outcome.Methods and Results:Fifty patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to either RF or VGLB ablation in a 1 : 1 fashion. After PVI each PV underwent an APT. All patients underwent a 3-day Holter and clinical follow-up every 3 months. Significantly less PVs reconnected during APT in the VGLB-arm (10 PV (10.8%) vs. 29 PV (30.9%); P=0.001). Significantly less patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in the VGLB-arm (3 vs. 9; P=0.047). In the VGLB-arm no recurrence was seen in those patients with a negative APT (negative predictive value (NPV)=100%). Only 3 of the 8 patients with a positive APT in the VGLB-arm had a recurrence (positive PV (PPV)=37%). Recurrences in the RF-arm were seen in 3 patients with positive APT as well as in 6 patients with negative APT (PPV=18% and NPV=33%).Conclusions:There was significantly less recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months after PVI with VGLB. A negative APT after PVI with VGBL predicted freedom from AF with a very high NPV meaning that the high acute efficiency of the VGLB persisted long term.

Aim: The study focused on biomarkers of kidney injury as predictors of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in a long-term follow-up (median 104 months). Methods/results: KIM-1, N...