Background: National cardiac registries are increasingly used for informing health policy, improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of patient care, clinical research, and monitoring the safety of novel treatments. However, the quality of registries is variable. We aimed to assess the characteristics and quality of national cardiac registries across all subspecialties of cardiac care. Methods: Publications relating to national cardiac registries across six cardiac subspecialty domains were identified by searching MEDLINE and the Google advanced search function with 26 438 citations and 4812 full-text articles reviewed. Results: A total of 155 registries, representing 49 countries, were included in the study. Of these, 45 related to coronary disease or percutaneous coronary intervention, 28 related to devices, arrhythmia, and electrophysiology, 24 related to heart failure, transplant, and mechanical support, 21 related to structural heart disease, 21 related to congenital heart disease, and 16 related to cardiac surgery. Enrollment was procedure-based in 60% and disease-based in 40%. A total of 73.10 million patients were estimated to have been enrolled in cardiac registries. Quality scoring was performed using a validated registry grading system, with registries performing best in the use of explicit variable definitions and worst in assessment of data reliability. Higher quality scores were associated with government funding, mandated enrollment, linkage to other registries, and outcome risk adjustment. Quality scores and number of registries within a country were positively correlated with each other and with measures of national economic output, health expenditure, and urbanization. Conclusions: There has been remarkable growth in the uptake of national cardiac registries across the last few decades. However, the quality of processes used to ensure data completeness and accuracy remain variable and few countries have integrated registries covering multiple subspecialty domains. Clinicians, funders, and health policymakers should be encouraged to focus on the range, quality, and integration of these registries. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero ; Unique identifier: CRD42020204224.

Background and aim: poor quality of life (QoL) has been identified as an independent risk factor for mortality and major cardiac events (MACE) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at baseline and its association with outcome in patients with coronary artery disease presenting for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The outcome was measured by mortality and MACE at 1-year, and whether there was any difference for sex and different age groups. Methods and results: all patients prospectively enrolled into the GenesisCare Outcome Registry (GCOR) over a 11-year period were included in the study. The EQ-5D-5L and VAS patient survey were used for assessment of baseline HRQoL. Of the 15,198 patients, only 6591 (43.4%) completed the self-assessment. Women had significantly more impairment of all five dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L survey, and their self-reported QoL was significantly lower than men (68.3 in women vs. 71.9 in men, p < 0.001). Poor QoL was strongly associated with increased mortality (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.62, p < 0.001) and MACE (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.79, p = 0.01). A similar trend was noted for women and men, but did not reach significance in women due to the smaller number of female patients. Conclusion: poor HRQoL is associated with subsequent mortality and MACE in patients undergoing PCI. By not assessing quality of life as a standard of care, an opportunity is lost to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from targeted interventions to improve health outcomes.

Objective: We aimed to assess the pattern of use of drug‐eluting stents (DESs) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in Victorian public hospitals. Design, setting and pat...