Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Multiple treatment options have been used over time to attempt to modify the natural progression of the disease in both proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). These two retinal complications are the result of microvascular occlusions and vascular hyperpermeability and are considered one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness in patients of working age. It is now well demonstrated that PDR and DME are associated with increased levels of inflammatory and pro-angiogenic factors in the ocular compartment. To date, laser photocoagulation, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, and corticosteroids have demonstrated efficacy in their treatment in large randomized controlled trials and in real-life observational studies. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive review of current treatments, including the main drugs used in diabetic pathologic manifestations, as well as new therapeutic alternatives, such as extended-release intraocular devices.

AIM: To analyze if a relationship between levels of inflammatory serum biomarkers and severity of primary proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) exists. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study. The healthy adult patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and primary PVR were included in the PVR group. For the control group, healthy adults who underwent cataract surgery were included. The grade of PVR was classified according to the Retinal Society Terminology Committee. Blood samples were obtained before surgery, and processed in MYTHIC 18. Measures of interest were neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), the time between the decrease in visual acuity and surgery, PVR grade, type of surgery, final best corrected visual acuity, and rate of re-detachment. RESULTS: Totally 240 patients were included, 120 in each group, 79 (65.8%) and 56 (46.7%) were male in the PVR and control group, respectively. PVR A had greater levels of monocytes (0.28±0.18 vs 0.12±0.32, P=0.002), neutrophils (4.59±1.51 vs 3.92±1.27, P=0.006), and LMR (9.32±4.42 vs 7.43±3.90, P=0.01). PVR B had a greater monocyte count (0.30±0.13 vs 0.12±0.32, P=0.001), and PVR C demonstrated higher levels in monocytes (0.27±0.12 vs 0.12±0.32, P=0.004), neutrophils (4.39±1.13 vs 3.92±1.27, P=0.004), and LMR (9.63±3.24 vs 7.43±3.90, P=0.002) compared to control, respectively. An LMR cut-off value of 9.38 predicted PVR with a sensibility of 54.2% and specificity of 77.5% and NLR cut-off of 1.70 predicted PVR with a sensibility of 62% and specificity of 54.2%. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary PVR demonstrate greater neutrophil, monocyte, and LMR levels than the control group. Cut-off values obtained from ratios could be useful in a clinical setting when no posterior view of the fundus is possible due to media opacity.

Purpose: To assess the relationship and prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with poor final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after surgical repair of open globe injuries (OGI) in adults.Design: Retrospective analysis of data from an ongoing prospective cohort of consecutive patients.Methods: In a tertiary university hospital, 197 eyes of 197 patients were included between 2013 and 2017. NLR and PLR were obtained from pre-operative blood tests to analyze its relationship with poor final BCVA.Results: Severe visual impairment (SVI) was defined as ≤20/200, and was observed in 96 (48.7%) patients after surgical repair of OGI. SVI patients had higher NLR (7.4 ± 6.6 vs. 4.0 ± 3.2, p < 0.001), and PLR (167 ± 92 vs. 139 ± 64; p = 0.021) than non-SVI. NLR ≥ 3.47 and PLR ≥ 112.2 were the best cut-off values for SVI, were univariate risk factors for SVI, and had sensitivity: 69.0, 71.4, and specificity: 63.6, 44.8, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only OTS, athalamia, and hyphema remained as risk factors. NLR had significant correlation with ocular trauma score (OTS) (r = −0.389, p < 0.001) and final BCVA (r = 0.345, p < 0.001).Limitations: Simultaneous trauma in other parts of the body that could influence the laboratory findings.Conclusion: Patients with SVI after a repaired OGI had increased pre-operative NLR and PLR levels. High NLR and PLR are risk factors for SVI in univariate analysis. It is confirmed that low OTS is a risk factor for SVI. High NLR and PLR could be used as a prognostic tool to identify patients at higher risk for SVI after repair of OGI.