Subramaniam Rathan

Prof. Subramaniam Rathan

1. Dean’s Office, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 November 2021 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSerkan Kuyumcu
Serkan Kuyumcu
YSYasemin Sanli
Yasemin Sanli
Subramaniam RathanSubramaniam Rathan
Subramaniam Rathan
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP), overexpressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), is a novel target for molecular imaging of various tumors. Recently, the development of several small-molecule FAP inhibitors for radiolabeling with 68Ga has resulted in the emergence of studies evaluating its clinical role in cancer imaging. Preliminary findings have demonstrated that, in contrast to radiotracers taking advantage of cancer-specific targets such as PSMA and DOTATATE, FAPs as a target are the most promising that can compete with 18FDG in terms of widespread indications. They also have the potential to overcome the shortcomings of 18FDG, particularly false-positive uptake due to inflammatory or infectious processes, low sensitivity in certain cancer types, and radiotherapy planning. In addition, the attractive theranostic properties may facilitate the treatment of many refractory cancers. This review summarizes the current FAP variants and related clinical studies, focusing on radiopharmacy, dosimetry, and diagnostic and theranostic applications.

8 June 2023 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GWGrayson Wass
Grayson Wass
KCKari Clifford
Kari Clifford
Subramaniam RathanSubramaniam Rathan
Subramaniam Rathan
Fibroblast-activation protein is a promising target for oncologic molecular imaging. Studies show that fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) radiotracers are accurate diagnostics with favorable tumor-to-background ratios across various cancers. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and metaanalysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT in comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT, the most widely used radiotracer in oncology. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, relevant trial registries, and bibliographies. The search consisted of combinations of terms for 3 topics: neoplasia, PET/CT, and FAPI. Two authors independently screened retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed using the criteria of QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and 95% CIs were calculated to determine diagnostic accuracy for primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions. A random-effects metaanalysis was used for pooling the data, and heterogeneity was assessed (I2 index). Results: Thirty-nine studies (1,259 patients) investigating the use of FAPI PET/CT were included. On a patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97–1.0) for the detection of primary lesions. Pooled sensitivity for nodal and distant metastases was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81–0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96–1.0), respectively. On a paired analysis between FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI had a higher sensitivity in the detection of primary, nodal, and metastatic lesions (all P < 0.001). The differences in sensitivities between FAPI and [18F]FDG were statistically significant. In terms of heterogeneity, analyses on primary lesions were moderately affected, distant metastatic lesions were highly affected, and the nodal metastatic analyses had negligible heterogeneity. Conclusion: The diagnostic performance of FAPI PET/CT is superior to that of [18F]FDG in the detection of primary, nodal, and distant metastases. However, further studies are needed to better evaluate its utility and indication in specific cancer types and clinical settings. Visual Abstract

15 April 2021 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYasemin Sanli
Yasemin Sanli
DSDuygu Has Simsek
Duygu Has Simsek
OSOner Sanli
Oner Sanli
Subramaniam RathanSubramaniam Rathan
Subramaniam Rathan
AKAyse T. Kendi
Ayse T. Kendi
The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the current status of 177Lu-PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen) therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the light of the current literature. We also addressed patient preparation, therapy administration and side effect profiles. 177Lu-PSMA therapy efficacy was assessed by using prospective trials, meta-analyses and major retrospective trials. Predictors of efficacy were also mentioned. Although there are some different approaches regarding the use of 177Lu-PSMA therapy in different countries, this type of therapy is generally safe, with a low toxicity profile. From the oncological point of view, a PSA (prostate specific antigen) decline of ≥50% was seen in 10.6–69% of patients with mCRPC; whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was reported to be 3–13.7 months in different studies. Consequently, 177Lu-PSMA therapy is a promising treatment in patients with mCRPC, with good clinical efficacy, even in heavily pretreated patients with multiple lines of systemic therapy. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials in the United States, including a phase III multicenter FDA registration trial.

20 June 2022 in Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAsha Kandathil
Asha Kandathil
Subramaniam RathanSubramaniam Rathan
Subramaniam Rathan

25 January 2023 in PET Clinics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAjitha Ramesh
Ajitha Ramesh
ACAniruddha Chatterjee
Aniruddha Chatterjee
Subramaniam RathanSubramaniam Rathan
Subramaniam Rathan

12 May 2022 in Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Subramaniam RathanSubramaniam Rathan
Subramaniam Rathan
FDFenghai M. Duan
Fenghai M. Duan
JRJustin Romanoff
Justin Romanoff
JYJian Qin Yu
Jian Qin Yu
TBTwyla Bartel
Twyla Bartel
VLVal J. Lowe
Val J. Lowe
To our knowledge, no prior multicenter clinical trial has reported interobserver agreement of 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for staging of clinical N0 neck in head and neck cancer. Methods: A total of 287 participants were recruited. For visual analysis, positive nodal uptake of 18F-FDG was defined as uptake visually greater than activity seen in the blood pool. Results: The negative predictive value of the 18F-FDG PET/CT for N0 clinical neck was 86% or above for visual assessment (95% CI, 86%–88%) for the 2 central readers and above 90% (95% CI, 90%–95%) for SUVmax for central reads and site reads dichotomized at the optimal cutoff value of 1.8 and the prespecified cutoff value of 3.5, respectively. The κ coefficients between the 2 expert readers and between central reads and site reads varied between 0.53 and 0.78. Conclusion: The NPV of the 18F-FDG PET/CT for N0 clinical neck was 86% or above for visual assessment and above 90% for SUVmax cut points of 1.8 and 3.5 with moderate to substantial agreements.