Michael James Beran

Dr. Michael James Beran

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2001 in Journal of Comparative Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael James Beran
Michael James Beran
Summation and numerousness judgments by 2 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) were investigated when 2 quantities of M&Ms were presented sequentially, and the quantities were never viewed in their totality. Each M&M was visible only before placement in 1 of 2 cups. In Experiment 1, sets of 1 to 9 M&Ms were presented. In Experiment 2, the quantities in each cup were presented as 2 smaller sets (e.g., 2 + 2 vs. 4 + 1). In Experiment 3, the quantities were presented as 3 smaller sets (e.g., 2 + 2 + 3 vs. 3 + 4 + 1). In Experiment 4, an M&M was removed from 1 set before the chimpanzees' selection. In Experiments 1 and 2, the chimpanzees selected the larger quantity on significantly more trials than would be predicted by chance. In Experiments 3 and 4, 1 chimpanzee performed at a level significantly better than chance. Therefore, chimpanzees mentally represent quantity and successfully combine and compare nonvisible, sequentially presented sets of items.

1 February 2004 in Psychological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael James Beran
Michael James Beran
MBMary M. Beran
Mary M. Beran

1 July 2012 in Animal Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JVJennifer Vonk
Jennifer Vonk
MBMichael James Beran
Michael James Beran

1 August 2008 in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJ. David Smith
J. David Smith
MBMichael James Beran
Michael James Beran
JCJustin J. Couchman
Justin J. Couchman
MCMariana V. C. Coutinho
Mariana V. C. Coutinho

24 October 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMany Primates
Many Primates
DADrew M. Altschul
Drew M. Altschul
MBMichael James Beran
Michael James Beran
MBManuel Bohn
Manuel Bohn
JCJosep Call
Josep Call
JWJulia Watzek
Julia Watzek
Inferring the evolutionary history of cognitive abilities requires large and diverse samples. However, such samples are often beyond the reach of individual researchers or institutions, and studies are often limited to small numbers of species. Consequently, methodological and site-specific-differences across studies can limit comparisons between species. Here we introduce the ManyPrimates project, which addresses these challenges by providing a large-scale collaborative framework for comparative studies in primate cognition. To demonstrate the viability of the project we conducted a case study of short-term memory. In this initial study, we were able to include 176 individuals from 12 primate species housed at 11 sites across Africa, Asia, North America and Europe. All subjects were tested in a delayed-response task using consistent methodology across sites. Individuals could access food rewards by remembering the position of the hidden reward after a 0, 15, or 30-second delay. Overall, individuals performed better with shorter delays, as predicted by previous studies. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a strong phylogenetic signal for short-term memory. Although, with only 12 species, the validity of this analysis is limited, our initial results demonstrate the feasibility of a large, collaborative open-science project. We present the ManyPrimates project as an exciting opportunity to address open questions in primate cognition and behaviour with large, diverse datasets.

23 August 2007 in Biology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TETheodore A Evans
Theodore A Evans
MBMichael James Beran
Michael James Beran
It is unknown whether animals, like humans, can employ behavioural strategies to cope with impulsivity. To examine this question, we tested whether chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) would use self-distraction as a coping strategy in a situation in which they had to continually inhibit responses to accumulating candies in order to earn a greater amount of those rewards. We tested animals in three conditions in which they were sometimes given a set of toys and were sometimes allowed physical access to the accumulating candies. Chimpanzees allowed the rewards to accumulate longer before responding when they could divert their attention to the toys, and they manipulated the toys more when the candies were physically accessible. Thus, chimpanzees engaged in self-distraction with the toys when such behaviour was most beneficial as a coping mechanism.