Meng Gao

Dr. Meng Gao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMeng Gao
Meng Gao
CWChenji Wei
Chenji Wei
XZXiangguo Zhao
Xiangguo Zhao
RHRuijie Huang
Ruijie Huang
JYJian Yang
Jian Yang
BLBaozhu Li
Baozhu Li
Production forecasting plays an important role in development plans during the entire period of petroleum exploration and development. Artificial intelligence has been extensively investigated in recent years because of its capacity to extensively analyze and interpret complex data. With the emergence of spatiotemporal models that can integrate graph convolutional networks (GCN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN), it is now possible to achieve multi-well production prediction by considering the impact of interactions between producers and historical production data simultaneously. Moreover, an accurate prediction not only depends on historical production data but also on the influence of neighboring injectors’ historical gas injection rate (GIR). Therefore, based on the assumption that introducing GIR can enhance prediction accuracy, this paper proposes a deep learning-based hybrid production forecasting model that is aimed at considering both the spatiotemporal characteristics of producers and the GIR of neighboring injectors. Specifically, we integrated spatiotemporal characteristics and GIR into an attribute-augmented spatiotemporal graph convolutional network (AST-GCN) and gated recurrent units (GRU) neural network to extract intricate temporal correlations from historical data. The method proposed in this paper has been successfully applied in a well pattern (including five producers and seven gas injectors) in a low-permeability carbonate reservoir in the Middle East. In single well production forecasting, the error of AST-GCN is 63.2%, 37.3%, and 16.1% lower in MedAE, MAE, and RMSE compared with GRU and 62.9%, 44.6%, and 28.9% lower compared with RNS. Similarly, the accuracy of AST-GCN is 15.9% and 35.8% higher than GRU and RNS in single well prediction. In well-pattern production forecasting, the error of AST-GCN is 41.2%, 64.2%, and 75.2% lower in RMSE, MAE, and MedAE compared with RNS, while the accuracy of AST-GCN is 29.3% higher. After different degrees of Gaussian noise are added to the actual data, the average change in AST-GCN is 3.3%, 0.4%, and 1.2% in MedAE, MAE, and RMSE, which indicates the robustness of the proposed model. The results show that the proposed model can consider the production data, gas injection data, and spatial correlation at the same time, which performs well in oil production forecasts.

24 July 2023 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMeng Gao
Meng Gao
CWChenji Wei
Chenji Wei
XZXiangguo Zhao
Xiangguo Zhao
RHRuijie Huang
Ruijie Huang
BLBaozhu Li
Baozhu Li
LXLihui Xiong
Lihui Xiong
The efficient development of oil reservoirs mainly depends on the comprehensive optimization of the subsurface fluid flow process. As an intelligent analysis technique, artificial intelligence provides a novel solution to multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems. In this study, an intelligent agent model based on the Transformer framework with the assistance of the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm has been utilized to optimize the gas flooding injection–production parameters in a well pattern in the Middle East. Firstly, 10 types of surveillance data covering 12 years from the target reservoir were gathered to provide a data foundation for model training and analysis. The prediction performance of the Transformer model reflected its higher accuracy compared to traditional reservoir numerical simulation (RNS) and other intelligent methods. The production prediction results based on the Transformer model were 21, 12, and 4 percentage points higher than those of RNS, bagging, and the bi-directional gated recurrent unit (Bi-GRU) in terms of accuracy, and it showed similar trends in the gas–oil ratio (GOR) prediction results. Secondly, the Pareto-based MOPSO algorithm was utilized to fulfil the two contradictory objectives of maximizing oil production and minimizing GOR simultaneously. After 10,000 iterations, the optimal injection–production parameters were proposed based on the generated Pareto frontier. To validate the feasibility and superiority of the developed approach, the development effects of three injection–production schemes were predicted in the intelligent agent model. In the next 400 days of production, the cumulative oil production increased by 25.3% compared to the average distribution method and 12.7% compared to the reservoir engineering method, while GOR was reduced by 27.1% and 15.3%, respectively. The results show that MOPSO results in a strategy that more appropriately optimizes oil production and GOR compared to some previous efforts published in the literature. The injection–production parameter optimization method based on the intelligent agent model and MOPSO algorithm can help decision makers to update the conservative development strategy and improve the development effect.

1 September 2025 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HZHan Zhang
Han Zhang
CWChenji Wei
Chenji Wei
GZGuangya Zhu
Guangya Zhu
MGMeng Gao
Meng Gao
JYJian Yang
Jian Yang
ZWZhichao Wang
Zhichao Wang
Water alternating gas (WAG) flooding is a relatively mature technology for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). It combines the advantages of water flooding and gas flooding to maintain reservoir pressure and effectively mitigate the issues of high mobility ratio and fingering, demonstrating preferable application prospects. However, the evaluation of its development effect faces the challenges of complexity and lack of adaptability attributed to the multiple interactions of various factors involved in WAG flooding. Moreover, there are few studies evaluating the development effect of producers. Therefore, the traditional hierarchical analysis process (AHP) is improved in this study to fill the gap in this technological field. This process is combined with the entropy weight method (EWM) to establish a coupled evaluation model. Subsequently, this study classifies the contribution weights of producers and proposes adjustment suggestions for the primary development contradictions. This study finds that the contribution weight of producers to the well group indicates that the development effect of producers is no longer influenced by a single factor, but is determined by the coupling effect of geological, engineering, and development factors. By constructing a coupled model and fully utilizing on-site data to objectively characterize the underground production situation, the development effect of producers can be more accurately reflected. Finally, a closed-loop optimization system for evaluating the development effect and potential of producers with WAG flooding is established, laying a theoretical foundation for dynamic analysis and development adjustment of on-site engineers.