Permanent deformation (or rutting) is a common distress in hot-mix asphalt (HMA) pavements. As part of the HMA mix and structural design processes to optimize field performance, the Hamburg wheel-tracking, dynamic modulus, and uniaxial repeated load permanent deformation tests have been developed to characterize the HMA rutting resistance potential. The primary objective of this study was to compare the three laboratory rutting tests of HMA mixes and to relate their rutting predictive potential to actual field performance. The research methodology incorporated a two-phase approach: laboratory testing and field performance monitoring of selected mixes under both conventional traffic loading and accelerated pavement testing. For the HMA mixes evaluated, a good correlation was observed in the three laboratory tests and in comparison with actual in situ field performance. Overall, the findings indicated that the Hamburg wheel-tracking test was the most feasible test for daily routine HMA mix design and screening, while both the dynamic modulus and repeated load permanent deformation tests exhibited greater potential for comprehensive characterization of HMA material property (e.g., modulus) and applications for pavement structural design as research-level test tools.

Durability of porous or permeable friction courses (PFC) is an important aspect to address when designing this type of hot mix asphalt. At present, several agencies perform the mix design of PFC primarily by determining volumetric mixture properties. This approach ensures adequate mixture functionality, but it does not guarantee mixture durability. This paper evaluates the Cantabro loss test, the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking test (HWTT) and the Overlay test (OT) to determine the one most appropriate for mix design and laboratory performance evaluations. The Cantabro loss test, performed in both dry and wet conditions, is recommended for PFC mix design to corroborate the suitability of the optimum asphalt content defined based on volumetric determinations. The HWTT and the OT are not recommended, since the variability of the test results indicated that these tests may not be suitable for PFC mixtures.