Dominik Heyers

Dr. Dominik Heyers

1. AG Neurosensorik, Institute of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2009 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZManuela Zapka
Manuela Zapka
DHDominik Heyers
Dominik Heyers
CHChristine M. Hein
Christine M. Hein
SESvenja Engels
Svenja Engels
NSNils-Lasse Schneider
Nils-Lasse Schneider
HMHenrik Mouritsen
Henrik Mouritsen

26 September 2007 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDominik Heyers
Dominik Heyers
MMMartina Manns
Martina Manns
HLHarald Luksch
Harald Luksch
OGOnur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün
HMHenrik Mouritsen
Henrik Mouritsen
The magnetic compass of migratory birds has been suggested to be light-dependent. Retinal cryptochrome-expressing neurons and a forebrain region, “Cluster N”, show high neuronal activity when night-migratory songbirds perform magnetic compass orientation. By combining neuronal tracing with behavioral experiments leading to sensory-driven gene expression of the neuronal activity marker ZENK during magnetic compass orientation, we demonstrate a functional neuronal connection between the retinal neurons and Cluster N via the visual thalamus. Thus, the two areas of the central nervous system being most active during magnetic compass orientation are part of an ascending visual processing stream, the thalamofugal pathway. Furthermore, Cluster N seems to be a specialized part of the visual wulst. These findings strongly support the hypothesis that migratory birds use their visual system to perceive the reference compass direction of the geomagnetic field and that migratory birds “see” the reference compass direction provided by the geomagnetic field.

10 February 2016 in Annual Review of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHenrik Mouritsen
Henrik Mouritsen
DHDominik Heyers
Dominik Heyers
OGOnur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün
Migratory birds can navigate over tens of thousands of kilometers with an accuracy unobtainable for human navigators. To do so, they use their brains. In this review, we address how birds sense navigation- and orientation-relevant cues and where in their brains each individual cue is processed. When little is currently known, we make educated predictions as to which brain regions could be involved. We ask where and how multisensory navigational information is integrated and suggest that the hippocampus could interact with structures that represent maps and compass information to compute and constantly control navigational goals and directions. We also suggest that the caudolateral nidopallium could be involved in weighing conflicting pieces of information against each other, making decisions, and helping the animal respond to unexpected situations. Considering the gaps in current knowledge, some of our suggestions may be wrong. However, our main aim is to stimulate further research in this fascinating field.

3 May 2010 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDominik Heyers
Dominik Heyers
MZManuela Zapka
Manuela Zapka
MHMara Hoffmeister
Mara Hoffmeister
JWJohn Martin Wild
John Martin Wild
HMHenrik Mouritsen
Henrik Mouritsen
The upper beak of birds, which contains putative magnetosensory ferro-magnetic structures, is innervated by the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve (V1). However, because of the absence of replicable neurobiological evidence, a general acceptance of the involvement of the trigeminal nerve in magnetoreception is lacking in birds. Using an antibody to ZENK protein to indicate neuronal activation, we here document reliable magnetic activation of neurons in and near the principal (PrV) and spinal tract (SpV) nuclei of the trigeminal brainstem complex, which represent the two brain regions known to receive primary input from the trigeminal nerve. Significantly more neurons were activated in PrV and in medial SpV when European robins ( Erithacus rubecula ) experienced a magnetic field changing every 30 seconds for a period of 3 h (CMF) than when robins experienced a compensated, zero magnetic field condition (ZMF). No such differences in numbers of activated neurons were found in comparison structures. Under CMF conditions, sectioning of V1 significantly reduced the number of activated neurons in and near PrV and medial SpV, but not in lateral SpV or in the optic tectum. Tract tracing of V1 showed spatial proximity and regional overlap of V1 nerve endings and ZENK-positive (activated) neurons in SpV, and partly in PrV, under CMF conditions. Together, these results suggest that magnetic field changes activate neurons in and near the trigeminal brainstem complex and that V1 is necessary for this activation. We therefore suggest that V1 transmits magnetic information to the brain in this migratory passerine bird.

16 February 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGerald Falkenberg
Gerald Falkenberg
GFGerta Fleissner
Gerta Fleissner
KSKirsten Schuchardt
Kirsten Schuchardt
MKMarkus Kuehbacher
Markus Kuehbacher
PTPeter Thalau
Peter Thalau
GFGuenther Fleissner
Guenther Fleissner
The magnetic field sensors enabling birds to extract orientational information from the Earth's magnetic field have remained enigmatic. Our previously published results from homing pigeons have made us suggest that the iron containing sensory dendrites in the inner dermal lining of the upper beak are a candidate structure for such an avian magnetometer system. Here we show that similar structures occur in two species of migratory birds (garden warbler, Sylvia borin and European robin, Erithacus rubecula) and a non-migratory bird, the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus). In all these bird species, histological data have revealed dendrites of similar shape and size, all containing iron minerals within distinct subcellular compartments of nervous terminals of the median branch of the Nervus ophthalmicus. We also used microscopic X-ray absorption spectroscopy analyses to identify the involved iron minerals to be almost completely Fe III-oxides. Magnetite (Fe II/III) may also occur in these structures, but not as a major Fe constituent. Our data suggest that this complex dendritic system in the beak is a common feature of birds, and that it may form an essential sensory basis for the evolution of at least certain types of magnetic field guided behavior.

1 October 2015 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DKDmitry Kishkinev
Dmitry Kishkinev
NCNikita Chernetsov
Nikita Chernetsov
APAlexander Pakhomov
Alexander Pakhomov
DHDominik Heyers
Dominik Heyers
HMHenrik Mouritsen
Henrik Mouritsen