Carla Rohrer Bley

Prof. Carla Rohrer Bley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2008 in Veterinary Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMonika M. Welle
Monika M. Welle
CBCarla Rohrer Bley
Carla Rohrer Bley
JHJudith Howard
Judith Howard
SRSilvia Rüfenacht
Silvia Rüfenacht

14 April 2022 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCarla Rohrer Bley
Carla Rohrer Bley
FWFriederike Wolf
Friederike Wolf
PJPatrik Gonçalves Jorge
Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
VGVeljko Grilj
Veljko Grilj
IPIoannis Petridis
Ioannis Petridis
MVMarie-Catherine Vozenin
Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Purpose: The FLASH effect is characterized by normal tissue sparing without compromising tumor control. Although demonstrated in various preclinical models, safe translation of FLASH-radiotherapy stands to benefit from larger vertebrate animal models. Based on prior results, we designed a randomized phase III trial to investigate the FLASH effect in cat patients with spontaneous tumors. In parallel, the sparing capacity of FLASH-radiotherapy was studied on mini pigs by using large field irradiation. Experimental Design: Cats with T1-T2, N0 carcinomas of the nasal planum were randomly assigned to two arms of electron irradiation: arm 1 was the standard of care (SoC) and used 10 × 4.8 Gy (90% isodose); arm 2 used 1 × 30 Gy (90% isodose) FLASH. Mini pigs were irradiated using applicators of increasing size and a single surface dose of 31 Gy FLASH. Results: In cats, acute side effects were mild and similar in both arms. The trial was prematurely interrupted due to maxillary bone necrosis, which occurred 9 to 15 months after radiotherapy in 3 of 7 cats treated with FLASH-radiotherapy (43%), as compared with 0 of 9 cats treated with SoC. All cats were tumor-free at 1 year in both arms, with one cat progressing later in each arm. In pigs, no acute toxicity was recorded, but severe late skin necrosis occurred in a volume-dependent manner (7–9 months), which later resolved. Conclusions: The reported outcomes point to the caveats of translating single-high-dose FLASH-radiotherapy and emphasizes the need for caution and further investigations. See related commentary by Maity and Koumenis, p. 3636

15 October 2005 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJulia Buchholz
Julia Buchholz
BKBarbara Kaser-Hotz
Barbara Kaser-Hotz
TKTania Khan
Tania Khan
CBCarla Rohrer Bley
Carla Rohrer Bley
KMKatja Melzer
Katja Melzer
HWHeinrich Walt
Heinrich Walt
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to optimize and simplify photodynamic therapy using a new liposomal formulation of the photosensitizer meta-(tetrahydroxyphenyl)chlorin [m-THPC (Foscan); liposomal m-THPC (Fospeg)] and to reduce systemic reactions to the photosensitizer. Experimental Design: To examine the pharmacokinetics of liposomal m-THPC, we determined tissue and plasma variables in feline patients with spontaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In vivo fluorescence intensity measurements of tumor and skin were done with a fiber spectrophotometer after i.v. injection of m-THPC or liposomal m-THPC in 10 cats. Blood samples, drawn at several time points after photosensitizer administration, were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: None of the liposomal m-THPC–treated cats showed side effects during or after drug injection. Fluorescence intensities, fluorescence ratios (tumor fluorescence divided by skin fluorescence), and bioavailability in the tumor were 2 to 4 times higher with liposomal m-THPC compared with m-THPC. Liposomal m-THPC concentration in the tumor increased constantly to reach a maximum at 4 hours after injection. Plasma concentration and bioavailability were ∼3 times higher with liposomal m-THPC compared with m-THPC measured at the time points of highest plasma concentration. The distribution half-life was shorter with liposomal m-THPC, resulting in maximal tumor accumulation up to 5.5 times earlier. Maximal tumor accumulation and maximal fluorescence ratio with liposomal m-THPC occurred at the same time point, indicating maximal selectivity. In both groups, all cats responded to therapy. Conclusions: Liposomal m-THPC was well tolerated by all cats and seems to have superior pharmacokinetic properties compared with m-THPC. The efficacy of the drug warrants further study.

20 June 2006 in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJ. Fidel
J. Fidel
ISI. Schiller
I. Schiller
BHB. Hauser
B. Hauser
YJY. Jausi
Y. Jausi
CBCarla Rohrer Bley
Carla Rohrer Bley
BKB. Kaser‐Hotz
B. Kaser‐Hotz

27 November 2017 in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP. Beer
P. Beer
APAntonio Pozzi
Antonio Pozzi
CBCarla Rohrer Bley
Carla Rohrer Bley
NBNicholas Bacon
Nicholas Bacon
NPN. S. Pfammatter
N. S. Pfammatter
CVC. Venzin
C. Venzin

12 February 2009 in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CEC. Eckstein
C. Eckstein
FGFranco Guscetti
Franco Guscetti
MRM. Roos
M. Roos
JMJ. Martín de Las Mulas
J. Martín de Las Mulas
BKB. Kaser‐Hotz
B. Kaser‐Hotz
CBCarla Rohrer Bley
Carla Rohrer Bley