Bradley Young

Bradley Young

Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 October 2024 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KRKieran Rivers
Kieran Rivers
BYBradley Young
Bradley Young
YTYuanbo T. Tang
Yuanbo T. Tang
BLBo-Shiuan Li
Bo-Shiuan Li
AWAngus J. Wilkinson
Angus J. Wilkinson
JLJunliang Liu
Junliang Liu

11 March 2024 in Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJunliang Liu
Junliang Liu
HMHarry Myers
Harry Myers
BYBradley Young
Bradley Young
ALAlex Leide
Alex Leide
JWJames Wade-Zhu
James Wade-Zhu
DADavid E.J. Armstrong
David E.J. Armstrong

11 January 2023 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAlexander William Carruthers
Alexander William Carruthers
BYBradley Young
Bradley Young
Ed PickeringEd Pickering
Ed Pickering
The Ta-Ru binary phase diagram has not been fully investigated, but shows potential for a two-phase region of A2 + B2. Given the high melting points of both Ta and Ru, such an alloy would have the potential for high temperature strength. A Ta72Ru28 alloy was arc melted and investigated in the as-cast and aged (at 1000 °C) states. The as cast alloy was composed of A2 and B2, albeit not in a superalloy-like morphology. A third phase was found in the aged alloy, which has not been reported before, and which is also a coherent superlattice phase of the Ta BCC matrix. The structure of this phase was found to be consistent with the tetragonal Cr2Al prototype structure, with lattice parameters of (a, a, 3a), where a is the Ta BCC lattice parameter.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEmily Rose Lewis
Emily Rose Lewis
GAGuy Anderson
Guy Anderson
DLDiego Martinez de Luca
Diego Martinez de Luca
BYBradley Young
Bradley Young
TDThomas P. Davis
Thomas P. Davis
Qualification is the evidence-based process through which confidence is established that a component will perform its intended function, in its intended environment, for its intended lifetime, with the required reliability. It is an owner-led activity that defines the type, quantity and quality of data required for codification and for the industrial deployment of components and their structural materials. This paper presents a structured qualification framework and applies it to a fusion machine breeder blanket structure as a representative component. It demonstrates that qualification, rather than material properties alone, dictates the use of fusion structural materials and the deployment of such materials under ASME BPV and AFCEN RCC codes. Current limitations in addressing irradiation synergy, liquid metal corrosion, and joint integrity expose gaps that these codes cannot yet prescribe. Two contrasting structural blanket material case studies: metallic-based ferritic-martensitic steel Eurofer97 and non-metallic-based silicon carbide fibre-reinforced composites (SiCf/SiC) are used to illustrate the differing evidence requirements for each system type. Industrial scale-up considerations, including alloy specifications, manufacturing readiness, inspection reliability, and supply-chain maturity, are evaluated alongside the need for internationally harmonised datasets and design methodologies. Fusion programmes can use a phased qualification strategy in which early, time-limited operation under controlled conditions builds the evidence needed for codification and scale-up, with the required pre-operation qualification level depending on risk, component criticality and failure consequences, and with the pace of qualification ultimately setting how quickly industry can supply components for commercial fusion. Codification remains essential for commercial deployment because construction codes express codified material behaviour through allowable stresses and permitted fabrication routes, enabling designers to use advanced materials without disclosing proprietary data. In jurisdictions where ASME BPV compliance is mandatory, codification determines whether a material may enter pressure boundary service and must therefore form part of the fusion machine owner’s long-term strategy for deployment.