Background: The goal of this study was to determine whether there are correlations between various options of surgical treatment and long-term outcome for spinal osteosarcoma.Methods: This was a retrospective review of 16 patients with spinal osteosarcoma, who underwent surgical treatment from 1999 to 2010. Seven patients were given totalen blocspondylectomy (TES), while nine received piecemeal resection (there were seven cases of total piecemeal spondylectomy, one of sagittal resection, and one of vertebrectomy). The outcome and prognosis of the patients were evaluated, grouped by surgical treatment.Results: All 16 cases were followed for an average of 42.4 months. At follow-up, all patients noted that pain had eased or had gradually disappeared. Three months after surgery, eight patients (50.0%) had improved 1 to 2 grades in their neurological status, based on Frankel scoring. Six (37.5%) patients experienced local recurrence of the tumor, nine (56.3%) had metastases, and five (31.3%) died of the disease. Of the six patients who received a wide or marginalen blocresection, none developed local recurrence or died from the disease. Conversely, of the ten patients who received intralesional or contaminated resections, six (60%) relapsed and five (50%) died from the disease.Conclusions: TES, with a wide margin, should be planned for patients with osteosarcoma of the cervical and thoracolumbar spine, whenever possible. When the patients are not candidates foren blocresection, total piecemeal spondylectomy is an appropriate choice for osteosarcoma in the mobile spine.
MiR-195-5p is critical in REG-mediated regulation of wnt/-catenin pathway in renal cell carcinoma miR-195-5p is critical in REGγ-mediated regulation of wnt/β-catenin pathway in renal cell carcinoma
Breast cancer is prone to form bone metastases and subsequent skeletal‐related events (SREs) dramatically decrease patients’ quality of life and survival. Prediction and early management of bone lesions are valuable; however, proper prognostic models are inadequate. In the current study, we reviewed a total of 572 breast cancer patients in three microarray data sets including 191 bone metastases and 381 metastases‐free. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated less aggressive and low‐grade features of patients with bone metastases compared with metastases‐free ones, while luminal subtypes are more prone to form bone metastases. Five bone metastases‐related genes (KRT23, REEP1, SPIB, ALDH3B2, and GLDC) were identified and subjected to construct a gene expression signature‐based nomogram (GESBN) model. The model performed well in both training and testing sets for evaluation of breast cancer bone metastases (BCBM). Clinically, the model may help in prediction of early bone metastases, prevention and management of SREs, and even help to prolong survivals for patients with BCBM. The five‐gene GESBN model showed some implications as molecular diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. Furthermore, our study also provided a way for analysis of tumor organ‐specific metastases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published model focused on tumor organ‐specific metastases.