Boris S. Gutkin

Dr. Boris S. Gutkin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2015 in Trends in Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAlexandre Hyafil
Alexandre Hyafil
AGAnne-Lise Giraud
Anne-Lise Giraud
LFLorenzo Fontolan
Lorenzo Fontolan
BGBoris S. Gutkin
Boris S. Gutkin

1 January 2002 in SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCarlo Laing
Carlo Laing
WTWilliam C. Troy
William C. Troy
BGBoris S. Gutkin
Boris S. Gutkin
GEG. Bard Ermentrout
G. Bard Ermentrout
We study a partial integro-differential equation defined on a spatially extended domain that arises from the modeling of "working" or short-term memory in a neuronal network. The equation is capable of supporting spatially localized regions of high activity which can be switched "on" and "off" by transient external stimuli. We analyze the effects of coupling between units in the network, showing that if the connection strengths decay monotonically with distance, then no more than one region of high activity can persist, whereas if they decay in an oscillatory fashion, then multiple regions can persist.

2 December 2014 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKMehdi Keramati
Mehdi Keramati
BGBoris S. Gutkin
Boris S. Gutkin
Efficient regulation of internal homeostasis and defending it against perturbations requires adaptive behavioral strategies. However, the computational principles mediating the interaction between homeostatic and associative learning processes remain undefined. Here we use a definition of primary rewards, as outcomes fulfilling physiological needs, to build a normative theory showing how learning motivated behaviors may be modulated by internal states. Within this framework, we mathematically prove that seeking rewards is equivalent to the fundamental objective of physiological stability, defining the notion of physiological rationality of behavior. We further suggest a formal basis for temporal discounting of rewards by showing that discounting motivates animals to follow the shortest path in the space of physiological variables toward the desired setpoint. We also explain how animals learn to act predictively to preclude prospective homeostatic challenges, and several other behavioral patterns. Finally, we suggest a computational role for interaction between hypothalamus and the brain reward system.

1 June 2001 in Neural Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEBard Ermentrout
Bard Ermentrout
MPMatthew Pascal
Matthew Pascal
BGBoris S. Gutkin
Boris S. Gutkin
There are several different biophysical mechanisms for spike frequency adaptation observed in recordings from cortical neurons. The two most commonly used in modeling studies are a calcium-dependent potassium current Iahp and a slow voltage-dependent potassium current, Im. We show that both of these have strong effects on the synchronization properties of excitatorily coupled neurons. Furthermore, we show that the reasons for these effects are different. We show through an analysis of some standard models, that the M-current adaptation alters the mechanism for repetitive firing, while the after hyperpolarization adaptation works via shunting the incoming synapses. This latter mechanism applies with a network that has recurrent inhibition. The shunting behavior is captured in a simple two-variable reduced model that arises near certain types of bifurcations. A one-dimensional map is derived from the simplified model.

29 May 2015 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AHAlexandre Hyafil
Alexandre Hyafil
LFLorenzo Fontolan
Lorenzo Fontolan
CKClaire Kabdebon
Claire Kabdebon
BGBoris S. Gutkin
Boris S. Gutkin
AGAnne-Lise Giraud
Anne-Lise Giraud
Many environmental stimuli present a quasi-rhythmic structure at different timescales that the brain needs to decompose and integrate. Cortical oscillations have been proposed as instruments of sensory de-multiplexing, i.e., the parallel processing of different frequency streams in sensory signals. Yet their causal role in such a process has never been demonstrated. Here, we used a neural microcircuit model to address whether coupled theta–gamma oscillations, as observed in human auditory cortex, could underpin the multiscale sensory analysis of speech. We show that, in continuous speech, theta oscillations can flexibly track the syllabic rhythm and temporally organize the phoneme-level response of gamma neurons into a code that enables syllable identification. The tracking of slow speech fluctuations by theta oscillations, and its coupling to gamma-spiking activity both appeared as critical features for accurate speech encoding. These results demonstrate that cortical oscillations can be a key instrument of speech de-multiplexing, parsing, and encoding.

1 July 1998 in Neural Computation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBoris S. Gutkin
Boris S. Gutkin
GEG. Bard Ermentrout
G. Bard Ermentrout
We propose a biophysical mechanism for the high interspike interval variability observed in cortical spike trains. The key lies in the nonlinear dynamics of cortical spike generation, which are consistent with type I membranes where saddle-node dynamics underlie excitability (Rinzel & Ermentrout, 1989). We present a canonical model for type I membranes, the θ-neuron. The θ-neuron is a phase model whose dynamics reflect salient features of type I membranes. This model generates spike trains with coefficient of variation (CV) above 0.6 when brought to firing by noisy inputs. This happens because the timing of spikes for a type I excitable cell is exquisitely sensitive to the amplitude of the suprathreshold stimulus pulses. A noisy input current, giving random amplitude “kicks” to the cell, evokes highly irregular firing across a wide range of firing rates; an intrinsically oscillating cell gives regular spike trains. We corroborate the results with simulations of the Morris-Lecar (M-L) neural model with random synaptic inputs: type I M-L yields high CVs. When this model is modified to have type II dynamics (periodicity arises via a Hopf bifurcation), however, it gives regular spike trains (CV below 0.3). Our results suggest that the high CV values such as those observed in cortical spike trains are an intrinsic characteristic of type I membranes driven to firing by “random” inputs. In contrast, neural oscillators or neurons exhibiting type II excitability should produce regular spike trains.