Claes Wahlestedt

Prof. Claes Wahlestedt

Center for Therapeutic Innovation, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2015 in Trends in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGeorges St. Laurent
Georges St. Laurent
Claes WahlestedtClaes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt
PKPhilipp Kapranov
Philipp Kapranov

25 March 2012 in Nature Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFarzaneh Modarresi
Farzaneh Modarresi
MFMohammad Ali Faghihi
Mohammad Ali Faghihi
MLMiguel Lopez-Toledano
Miguel Lopez-Toledano
RFRoya Pedram Fatemi
Roya Pedram Fatemi
MMMarco Magistri
Marco Magistri
Claes WahlestedtClaes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt
Methods for specific gene silencing have advanced as far as clinical trials, but a similar set of tools does not exist for increasing gene expression. Modarresi et al. demonstrate gene-specific upregulation in vivo by treating mice with oligonucleotides that inhibit the function of natural antisense transcripts. The ability to specifically upregulate genes in vivo holds great therapeutic promise. Here we show that inhibition or degradation of natural antisense transcripts (NATs) by single-stranded oligonucleotides or siRNAs can transiently and reversibly upregulate locus-specific gene expression. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is normally repressed by a conserved noncoding antisense RNA transcript, BDNF-AS. Inhibition of this transcript upregulates BDNF mRNA by two- to sevenfold, alters chromatin marks at the BDNF locus, leads to increased protein levels and induces neuronal outgrowth and differentiation both in vitro and in vivo. We also show that inhibition of NATs leads to increases in glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and ephrin receptor B2 (EPHB2) mRNA. Our data suggest that pharmacological approaches targeting NATs can confer locus-specific gene upregulation effects.

13 December 2013 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VPVeronica J Peschansky
Veronica J Peschansky
Claes WahlestedtClaes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt
Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is an increasingly well-understood concept that explains much of the contribution of an organism’s environment and experience to its biology. However, discussion persists as to which mechanisms can be classified as epigenetic. Ongoing research continues to uncover novel pathways, including the important role of non-protein coding RNA transcripts in epigenetic gene regulation. We know that the majority of human and other mammalian transcripts are not translated but that many of these are nonetheless functional. These non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) can be short (< 200 nt) or long (< 200 nt) and are further classified by genomic origin and mechanism of action. We discuss examples of ncRNAs that interact with histone modifying complexes or DNA methyltransferases to regulate gene expression, others that are targets of these epigenetic mechanisms, and propose a model in which such transcripts feed back into an epigenetic regulatory network.

31 May 2013 in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Claes WahlestedtClaes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt

13 October 2014 in EMBO Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSteven K Carlsson
Steven K Carlsson
SBShaun P Brothers
Shaun P Brothers
Claes WahlestedtClaes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the deadliest form of brain tumor with a more than 90% 5‐year mortality. GBM has a paltry median survival of 12.6 months attributed to the unique treatment limitations such as the high average age of onset, tumor location, and poor current understandings of the tumor pathophysiology. The resection techniques, chemotherapic strategies, and radiation therapy currently used to treat GBM have slowly evolved, but the improvements have not translated to marked increases in patient survival. Here, we will discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GBM pathophysiology, and the diagnostic techniques and treatment options. The discussion will include biomarkers, tumor imaging, novel therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and small‐molecule inhibitors, and the heterogeneity resulting from the GBM cancer stem cell population.

1 June 2015 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OKO. Khorkova
O. Khorkova
JHJ. Hsiao
J. Hsiao
Claes WahlestedtClaes Wahlestedt
Claes Wahlestedt