Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) provokes a cascade reaction that is responsible for early and delayed brain injuries mediated by intracranial hypertension, hydrocephalus, cerebral vasospasm (CV), and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), which result in increased morbidity and mortality. During open microsurgical repair, cisternal access is achieved essentially to gain proximal vascular control and aneurysm exposition. Cisternostomy also allows brain relaxation, removal of cisternal clots, and restoration of the CSF dynamics through the communication between the anterior and posterior circulation cisterns and the ventricular system, with the opening of the Membrane of Liliequist and lamina terminalis, respectively. Continuous postoperative CSF drainage through a cisternal drain (CD) is a valuable option for treating acute hydrocephalus and intracranial hypertension. Moreover, it efficiently removes the blood and toxic degradation products, with a potential benefit on CV, DCI, and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Finally, the CD is an effective pathway to administer vasoactive, fibrinolytic, and anti-oxidant agents and shows promising results in decreasing CV and DCI rates while minimizing systemic effects. We performed a comprehensive review to establish the adjuvant role of cisternostomy and CD performed in cases of direct surgical repair for ruptured intracranial aneurysms and their role in the prevention and treatment of aSAH complications.

Even if usually needed to achieve the gross total resection (GTR) of spinal benign nerve sheath tumors (NSTs), nerve root sacrifice remains controversial regarding the risk of neurological deficit. For foraminal NSTs, we hypothesize that the involved root is poorly functional and thus can be safely sacrificed. All spinal benign NSTs with foraminal extension that underwent surgery from 2013 to 2021 were reviewed. The impacts of preoperative clinical status and patient and tumor characteristics on long-term outcomes were analyzed. Twenty-six patients were included, with a mean follow-up (FU) of 22.4 months. Functional motor roots (C5-T1, L3-S1) were involved in 14 cases. The involved nerve root was routinely sacrificed during surgery and GTR was obtained in 84.6% of cases. In the functional root subgroup, for patients with a pre-existing deficit (n = 5/14), neurological aggravation persisted in one case at last FU (n = 1/5), whereas for those with no preop deficit (n = 9/14), a postoperative deficit persisted in one patient only (n = 1/9). Preoperative radicular pain was the only characteristic significantly associated with an immediate postoperative motor deficit (p = 0.03). The sacrifice of an involved nerve root in foraminal NSTs seems to represent a reasonable and relevant option to resect these tumors, permitting one to achieve tumor resection in an oncologic fashion with a high rate of GTR.

Cerebrospinal fluid tap test is a common procedure to predict the efficacy of ventriculoperitoneal shunt for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Objective tests after cerebrospinal fluid tap test are used to establish the surgical indication, but subjective improvements may also be important in selection of surgical candidates. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical outcomes of patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, comparing patients showing objective improvement with patients improving only on subjective assessments. In this retrospective analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included patients with improvement on objective evaluation after cerebrospinal fluid tap test; group 2 included patients who showed only subjective improvement. The surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. Of 28 included patients, 17 were objective responders (group 1), and 11 were subjective responders (group 2). Clinical and radiological characteristics were similar. The only significant difference was the baseline Berg Balance Scale, which was lower in objective responders (P = 0.0015). At 3 months after surgery and at last follow-up, there was no difference in surgical outcomes between the 2 groups. However, in the group of subjective responders, a continuous improvement for incontinence and gait was more frequently observed (P = 0.04 and P < 0.001, respectively). Surgical outcomes after ventriculoperitoneal shunt were similar between the 2 groups, with a more favorable trend in terms of symptom improvement for subjective responders. Subjective assessment seems to be an important factor to consider in preoperative evaluation.

Cervical foraminal chondromas are benign lesions that may require surgical resection when symptomatic due to radicular and/or spinal cord compression. The aim of surgery is to achieve gross tumor removal while preserving neurological function and spine stability. The authors describe a case of subaxial foraminal chondroma with a systematic review of the literature on patients with cervical chondromas. In the reported case, the authors used a retrojugular approach to remove a C6-C7 right chondroma without the need for spinal stabilization. Literature review identified a total of 11 patients who underwent surgery for subaxial foraminal chondroma. The mean age at diagnosis is 33.6 years (range: 10–73). Most patients report neurological symptoms at the time of diagnosis. The most frequently involved vertebral level is C4-C5 (54.6%, 6/11). Preoperative foraminal enlargement is present in 63.6% (7/11) of patients. Surgical resection is performed via an anterior approach in 18.2% (2/11) of patients, with vertebral body resection and concomitant cervical instrumentation. The anterolateral approach is selected in 27.2% (3/11) of patients, and the posterior approach in 54.6% (6/11) of patients, with only one patient requiring both anterior and posterior instrumentation. The choice of surgical access for subaxial foraminal chondroma can be challenging due to the anatomical location of the tumor in relation to the cervical nerve roots and spinal cord. Accurate approach selection is key to achieving complete tumor removal while preserving cervical spine stability.

Introduction: Hemangioblastomas (HBs) are benign, highly vascular tumors that can be found intracranially or in the spinal region, representing around 2–15% of primary intramedullary tumors. They can occur sporadically or in association with Von Hipple–Lindau (VHL) disease. Despite recent of advancement of nonsurgical treatments, complete surgical resection remains the gold standard of care for the spinal HBs. Materials and Methods: We conducted an international multicenter retrospective analysis of adult patients surgically treated for spinal HBs in four European referral centers between January 2000 and September 2024, with a minimum post-operative follow-up duration of 6 months. Patients’ sex and age at surgical intervention, clinical presentation, and duration symptoms prior to clinical diagnosis were identified. The pre- and post-operative neurological status at 1 and 6 months and at the last visit was assessed using the modified McCormick score (MCS). The extent of surgical resection was divided into gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR). Finally, post-operative complications were inspected as well, namely cerebrospinal fluid leaks, infections, hemorrhages and post-operative spinal stability. Results: A total of 35 patients were included in the cohort, with an age median of 52 years (34.5–60) and a slight male predominance (21/35, i.e., 60%). The median follow-up period was 37.5 months (12–75). More than half were located in the cervical region, making it the most common (54.3%). Syrinxes were observed in 23 cases (72%), and HBs were more commonly intramedullary (80%). GTR was achievable in around 88% of cases. Post-operative complications were observed in nine patients (25.7%). Nearly half of patients were discharged into rehabilitations centers (48.5%). Tumor recurrence was seen in 10.3% only. At the last follow-up, an excellent overall post-operative neurological status (positive ∆ McCormick) was observed in most of patients (88%) and was found to be associated with a relatively younger age group. Tumor location and presence of syrinxes did not show any statistical significance regarding clinical outcome. In patients having benefited from intra-operative monitoring, only D-wave changes showed statistical significance regarding post-operative outcome (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A large majority of patients operated for a spinal HB demonstrated favorable outcome after surgery, with unchanged or improved neurological status. Advanced age could have an impact on the post-operative neurological outcome. Other factors such as tumor size, location, and the presence of syrinx did not seem to significantly impact the neurological outcome. Finally, the surgery of these vascular lesions with no possibility of debulking or piece-meal removal and requiring “en bloc” resection is technically demanding and should be performed by experienced teams in spine and spinal cord surgery only.