Louis Bender

Dr. Louis Bender


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in Wildlife Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLouis Bender
Louis Bender
JCJohn G. Cook
John G. Cook
RCRachel C. Cook
Rachel C. Cook
PHP. Briggs Hall
P. Briggs Hall
We related annual and seasonal survival of four populations of elk Cervus elaphus in the Pacific Northwest, USA, to measures and indices of individual nutritional condition. Among populations, for all mortality (human and non-human causes) sources inclusive, annual survival of adult females was correlated with a rump body condition score (rs = 0.627, P = 0.071), and survival over spring-summer-autumn (SSA) was correlated with mean ingesta-free body fat (IFBF; rs = 0.567, P = 0.088) and rump body condition score (rBCS; rs = 0.615, P = 0.050). For non-human mortality sources only, survival through SSA was correlated with IFBF (rs = 0.567, P = 0.088) and rBCS (rs = 0.615, P = 0.050), and survival over winter was correlated with withers body condition score (rs = 0.677, P = 0.045). For human-caused mortality sources only, survival over SSA was correlated with rBCS (rs = 0.696, P = 0.036) and IFBF (rs = 0.696, P = 0.036). For individuals, logistic analysis found that individual likelihood of dying fro...

1 June 2007 in The Journal of Wildlife Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLouis Bender
Louis Bender
LLLaurie A. Lomas
Laurie A. Lomas
JBJason Browning
Jason Browning

1 November 2006 in Wildlife Society Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLouis Bender
Louis Bender

1 September 2005 in Wildlife Society Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLouis Bender
Louis Bender
MWMara E. Weisenberger
Mara E. Weisenberger

1 October 2004 in The Journal of Wildlife Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLouis Bender
Louis Bender
GSGreg A. Schirato
Greg A. Schirato
RSRocky D. Spencer
Rocky D. Spencer
KMKELLY R. McALLISTER
KELLY R. McALLISTER
BMBryan L. Murphie
Bryan L. Murphie

1 January 2005 in Journal of Wildlife Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLouis Bender
Louis Bender
SSStephen M. Schmitt
Stephen M. Schmitt
ECElaine Carlson
Elaine Carlson
JHJonathan B. Haufler
Jonathan B. Haufler
DBDean E. Beyer
Dean E. Beyer
Mortality from cerebrospinal parelaphostrongylosis caused by the meningeal worm (Parelaphostrongylus tenuis) has been hypothesized to limit elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) popu- lations in areas where elk are conspecific with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Elk were reintroduced into Michigan (USA) in the early 1900s and subsequently greatly increased population size and distribution despite sympatric high-density ($12/km 2) white-tailed deer pop- ulations. We monitored 100 radio-collared elk of all age and sex classes from 1981-94, during which time we documented 76 mortalities. Meningeal worm was a minor mortality factor for elk in Michigan and accounted for only 3% of mortalities, fewer than legal harvest (58%), illegal kills (22%), other diseases (7%), and malnutrition (4%). Across years, annual cause-specific mortality rates due to cerebrospinal parelaphostrongylosis were 0.033 (SE50.006), 0.029 (SE50.005), 0.000 (SE50.000), and 0.000 (SE50.000) for calves, 1-yr-old, 2-yr-old, and $3-yr-old, respectively. The overall population-level mortality rate due to cerebrospinal parelaphostrongylosis was 0.009 (SE50.001). Thus, meningeal worm had little impact on elk in Michigan during our study despite greater than normal precipitation (favoring gastropods) and record ($14 km2) deer densities. Further, elk in Michigan have shown sustained population rates-of-increase of $18%/yr and among the highest levels of juvenile production and survival recorded for elk in North America, indicating that elk can persist in areas with meningeal worm at high levels of population produc- tivity. It is likely that local ecologic characteristics among elk, white-tailed deer, and gastropods, and degree of exposure, age of elk, individual and population experience with meningeal worm, overall population vigor, and moisture determine the effects of meningeal worm on elk popula- tions.