White mold caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary continues to threaten yield and quality and remains a stubborn, sometimes unpredictable constraint in many cropping systems. The pathogen’s broad host range and its capacity to persist for years as sclerotia mean that fields can carry risk long after visible symptoms fade. Disease development is often driven by short windows of favorable temperature and moisture that promote germination and ascospore release and dispersal, while myceliogenic infection from soil-borne sclerotia can also initiate disease directly. Yet dependable control is still undermined by durable inoculum, limited stable host resistance, variable biocontrol performance, and shrinking chemical options together with fungicide resistance risk. Here we consolidate current understanding and ongoing uncertainties around sclerotial formation and germination cues, the environmental drivers that shape epidemic onset, and the processes governing host colonization, including the roles of cell wall-degrading enzymes, oxalic acid, and redox regulation, as well as the continuing debate over necrotrophic versus hemibiotrophic phases. Management is considered from a practical perspective, covering cultural risk reduction, forecasting-guided fungicide programmes supported by resistance-management principles, and biological control strategies targeting sclerotia. Across systems, the evidence points to the same lesson: single tactics rarely remain reliable under field variability, whereas integrated packages that reduce soil inoculum and align interventions with risk are more durable. Future priorities include resolving early infection events, improving prediction of carpogenic germination under changing climates, increasing the consistency of biocontrol, and accelerating resistance breeding supported by genomic resources.

The western corn rootworm (WCR) (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte; Chrysomelidae) is one of the most significant maize pests in Europe, with farmers spending a substantial amount (approximately 140 EUR) on its control. In the context of climate change, WCRs could pose an even greater threat to EU maize production, particularly as the European Union continues to withdraw an increasing number of effective yet environmentally harmful active agents. Biological control methods have now emerged to the forefront in creating sustainable agriculture. In this review, we carried out an extensive literature analysis on methods for forecasting WCRs and evaluated the practical applicability of the latest non-chemical control methods targeting its larvae. Effective forecasting is essential for successful pest management, enabling informed planning and the selection of the most suitable control methods. Several traditional predicting techniques remain in use today, but recent advancements have introduced modern electronic forecasting units combined with sensor-equipped pheromone and colour traps, as well as thermal sum calculations. Research has demonstrated that crop rotation is one of the most effective methods for controlling WCR larvae. Biological agents, such as entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bossiana and Mettarrhyzum anasoplia), entomopathogenic nematodes (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora), and botanical insecticides such as azadirachtin can significantly reduce larval populations and root damage, thereby maintaining infestation levels below the economic threshold. Genetically modified maize plants that produce specific toxins, along with conventional breeding efforts to increase root system regeneration, are also promising tools for the sustainable management of this pest. This review summarizes the solutions for prediction of western corn rootworm infestations and non-chemical control of its larvae. Accurate forecasting methods provide a clear picture of infestation levels in a given area, enabling precisely targeted control measures. In all cases, the control should be directed primarily against the larvae, thereby reducing root damage and reducing the size of the emerging imago population. This review demonstrates that biological control methods targeting larvae can be as effective as pesticides, supporting sustainable pest management.

The western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) is a significant maize pest in Hungary, particularly in monoculture systems. As many effective synthetic soil insecticides and seed dressings have been withdrawn, interest in environmentally friendly alternatives has grown. Among these, azadirachtin - an insecticide from the neem tree (Azadirachta indica) - offers long-lasting protection and reduced risk of resistance. We conducted multi-year field trials using seed-applied azadirachtin at doses ranging from 50% (0.022 mg/seed) to 300% (0.129 mg/seed), with 100% (0.043 mg/seed) as our previously recommended rate. In fields with moderate larval pressure, doses of 125-150% (0.053-0.065 mg/seed) prevented economic loss, although minor root damage occurred. In 2022, higher doses (200% and 300%) were tested under severe infestations (modified Iowa scale 3.93-5.10). Across sites, the 200% dose (0.086 mg/seed) showed the most favourable overall performance, reducing larval numbers and root damage while providing the best overall balance of efficacy and crop safety under high infestation pressure. In contrast, the 300% dose delayed development, likely due to poor germination under drought conditions, as the oil-rich formulation hindered water uptake. These findings underscore the need to tailor dosing to local conditions. Azadirachtin seed dressing is an effective and sustainable alternative to synthetic insecticides, with the 200% dosage showing the most favourable overall balance of efficacy and crop safety under high pest pressure.

Western corn rootworm is one of the most dangerous pests of maize, and both the larvae and the imagoes thereof may cause significant damage to the plants. The options of controlling these pests have recently become highly limited, thus creating a great demand for new control methods complying with sustainable plant protection. These requirements are met by the natural enemies of these pests, such as entomopathogenic nematodes (e.g. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Gerritsen, 1994). The objective of this study was to determine whether the viability and larvicide effect of a single injection into the soil of 2 billion nematodes using various amounts of water (50, 100 or 200 L/hectare) was maintained even with the lower quantities. Our studies proved that the entomopathogenic nematodes retain their viability and larvicide effect when applied using 50 L/ha of water. The efficacy of the biological agent did not differ from that of Force 1.5G, a product containing Tefluthrin as active ingredient, which was used as positive control.