Joseph Zuckerman

Dr. Joseph Zuckerman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2018 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRyan Simovitch
Ryan Simovitch
PFPierre-Henri Flurin
Pierre-Henri Flurin
TWThomas Wright
Thomas Wright
JZJoseph Zuckerman
Joseph Zuckerman
CRChristopher P. Roche
Christopher P. Roche

1 May 2018 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRyan Simovitch
Ryan Simovitch
PFPierre-Henri Flurin
Pierre-Henri Flurin
TWThomas Wright
Thomas Wright
JZJoseph Zuckerman
Joseph Zuckerman
CRChristopher P. Roche
Christopher P. Roche

1 November 2017 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRyan W. Simovitch
Ryan W. Simovitch
RFRichard J. Friedman
Richard J. Friedman
ECEmilie V. Cheung
Emilie V. Cheung
PFPierre-Henri Flurin
Pierre-Henri Flurin
TWThomas Wright
Thomas Wright
CRChristopher Roche
Christopher Roche
Background: This study quantifies the rate of improvement after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; a better understanding of the rate of improvement associated with each prosthesis type may better establish patient expectations for recovery. Methods: Prospectively collected data on 1,183 patients who underwent either anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 505) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 678) were collected. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores, along with range of motion, were recorded preoperatively and at routine postoperative time points. All included patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The rate of improvement of these outcome measures was quantified for patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and those who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty to compare recovery over time. Results: In this study, 3,587 visits by 1,183 patients were analyzed and several differences between prosthesis types were noted. Patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty experienced larger improvements in the Constant score and active forward flexion, and patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrated better improvement in external rotation compared with patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at nearly all time points. By 72 months, improvement in flexion and abduction decreased for each prosthesis type, but in particular for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Full improvement was achieved by 24 months, although the majority of improvement was achieved in the first 6 months, with all 5 scoring metrics following a similar rate of improvement. The ASES, SPADI, and UCLA Shoulder scores closely mirrored each other in the magnitude of improvement, and the SST score demonstrated the largest improvement and the Constant score demonstrated the smallest improvement for both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Conclusions: Both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty reliably result in improved patient outcomes. However, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty more reliably improves range of motion, particularly external rotation. Most improvement occurs by 6 months, with some additional improvement up to 2 years for both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Although the indications for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are substantially different, in addition to the biomechanical differences, the improvement in outcome scores over time can be expected to be very similar. This study is helpful to patients and health-care providers to establish expectations regarding the rate of recovery after total shoulder arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1 August 2020 in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KEKenneth A. Egol
Kenneth A. Egol
SKSanjit R. Konda
Sanjit R. Konda
MBMackenzie L. Bird
Mackenzie L. Bird
NDNicket Dedhia
Nicket Dedhia
ELEmma K. Landes
Emma K. Landes
FGfor The NYU COVID Hip Fracture Research Group
for The NYU COVID Hip Fracture Research Group
Objectives: To examine one health system's response to the essential care of its hip fracture population during the COVID-19 pandemic and report on its effect on patient outcomes. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Seven musculoskeletal care centers within New York City and Long Island. Patients/Participants: One hundred thirty-eight recent and 115 historical hip fracture patients. Intervention: Patients with hip fractures occurring between February 1, 2020, and April 15, 2020, or between February 1, 2019, and April 15, 2019, were prospectively enrolled in an orthopaedic trauma registry and chart reviewed for demographic and hospital quality measures. Patients with recent hip fractures were identified as COVID positive (C+), COVID suspected (Cs), or COVID negative (C−). Main Outcome Measurements: Hospital quality measures, inpatient complications, and mortality rates. Results: Seventeen (12.2%) patients were confirmed C+ by testing, and another 14 (10.1%) were suspected (Cs) of having had the virus but were never tested. The C+ cohort, when compared with Cs and C− cohorts, had an increased mortality rate (35.3% vs. 7.1% vs. 0.9%), increased length of hospital stay, a greater major complication rate, and a greater incidence of ventilator need postoperatively. Conclusions: COVID-19 had a devastating effect on the care of patients with hip fracture during the pandemic. Although practice patterns generally remained unchanged, treating physicians need to understand the increased morbidity and mortality in patients with hip fracture complicated by COVID-19. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.

10 August 2018 in Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJames X. Liu
James X. Liu
JWJordan Werner
Jordan Werner
TKThorsten Kirsch
Thorsten Kirsch
JZJoseph Zuckerman
Joseph Zuckerman
MVMandeep Virk
Mandeep Virk
Introduction: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) is widely used as a preoperative surgical skin-preparation solution and intra-wound irrigation agent, with excellent efficacy against wide variety of bacteria. The cytotoxic effect of CHX on local proliferating cells following orthopaedic procedures is largely undescribed. Our aim was to investigate the in vitro effects of CHX on primary fibroblasts, myoblasts, and osteoblasts.

1 July 2017 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBrent Mollon
Brent Mollon
SMSiddharth A. Mahure
Siddharth A. Mahure
CRChristopher P. Roche
Christopher P. Roche
JZJoseph Zuckerman
Joseph Zuckerman