Strength, power, and coactivation levels were measured during knee extension and flexion tasks in 20 children (13 males, 7 females) with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and 20 age-matched control children (12 males, 8 females). Participants were classified according to results obtained on the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development, with each group including two age levels: 6 to 7 and 9 to 10 years. Tasks were performed on a Biodex dynamometer under isometric and isokinetic conditions with surface EMG recorded from the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris muscles. Significant effects of group and age were observed for the measures of peak torque (isometric and isokinetic) and power, with the decreased power in the group with DCD being more apparent at higher velocities. A lower flexor-extensor percentage was recorded for the group with DCD but only under isokinetic conditions. From a neuromuscular perspective, the group with DCD had increased levels of coactivation (RMS agonist:RMS antagonist) during the isometric flexion and isokinetic extension actions. Possible causes of the strength and power deficits observed in children with DCD are discussed.

This study investigated whether a multi-dimensional assessment could assist with talent identification in junior Australian football (AF). Participants were recruited from an elite under 18 (U18) AF competition and classified into two groups; talent identified (State U18 Academy representatives; n = 42; 17.6 ± 0.4 y) and non-talent identified (non-State U18 Academy representatives; n = 42; 17.4 ± 0.5 y). Both groups completed a multi-dimensional assessment, which consisted of physical (standing height, dynamic vertical jump height and 20 m multistage fitness test), technical (kicking and handballing tests) and perceptual-cognitive (video decision-making task) performance outcome tests. A multivariate analysis of variance tested the main effect of status on the test criterions, whilst a receiver operating characteristic curve assessed the discrimination provided from the full assessment. The talent identified players outperformed their non-talent identified peers in each test (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve reflected near perfect discrimination (AUC = 95.4%), correctly classifying 95% and 86% of the talent identified and non-talent identified participants, respectively. When compared to single assessment approaches, this multi-dimensional assessment reflects a more comprehensive means of talent identification in AF. This study further highlights the importance of assessing multi-dimensional performance qualities when identifying talented team sports.

Coaches are an integral part of talent identification in sport and are often used as the “gold standard” against which scientific methods of talent identification are compared. However, their decision-making during this process is not well understood. In this article, we use an ecological approach to explore talent identification in combat sports. We interviewed twenty-four expert, international-level coaches from the Olympic disciplines of boxing, judo, and taekwondo (age: 48.7 + 7.5 years; experience: 20.8 + 8.3 years). Findings indicated that when coaches identify talent they rely on “gut instinct”: intuitive judgements made without conscious thought, used to direct attention to particular athletes or characteristics. Our analysis revealed four major contributors to coaches’ intuition: experiential knowledge, temporal factors, seeing athletes in context, and what can be worked with. Our findings demonstrate that i) athlete selections may be influenced by the coaches’ perceived ability to improve certain athletes (rather than solely on athlete ability); and ii) “instinctual” decisions are the result of years of experience, time spent with the athlete, and the context surrounding the decision. Based on these findings, we recommend that future research focuses on the duration and conditions that are required for coaches to confidently and reliably identify talented athletes.