Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is regarded as an important and promising target in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancers. However, the correlation of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic significance of HER2 overexpression in gastric cancer patients remains unclear. Our aim was to clarify this issue. Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles published up to May 2016. Outcomes of interest contained sex, age, tumor size, tumor site, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, distant metastasis, lymph node metastasis, Lauren’s classification, differentiation grade, lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, and multivariate analysis data for overall survival. A total of 41 studies of 17,494 gastric cancer patients were identified with HER2 test. HER2 positive rate was 19.07% (95% CI = 9.16, 28.98). There existed statistical significance between HER2 overexpression and patients’ prognosis (RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.98). Male patients (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.34, 1.65), proximal tumors (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.07, 1.47), intestinal-type tumors (OR = 3.37, 95% CI = 2.54, 4.47), advanced stage cancers (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.10, 1.66), lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.41), well-differentiated cancers (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.15, 2.76), and distant metastasis (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.08, 3.38) were correlated with higher HER2 expression rates. However, no statistical differences existed in age, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, or neural invasion. Subgroup analysis revealed that HER2 expression rates reported in articles from Asian (19.52%) countries were quantitatively higher than those from European (16.91%) areas. Results were consistent with those reports that define HER2 status according to trastuzumab for gastric cancer (ToGA) criteria. This study showed that HER2 overexpression was associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients. HER2 positive rates may be associated with sex, tumor site, TNM staging system, distant metastasis, lymph node metastasis, Lauren’s classification, and differentiation grade in gastric cancer patients. The HER2 expression rate in Asians may be higher than that in Europeans. This study offers a convenient way for doctors to select patients for relevant HER2 detection and following treatment.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is extensively used in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer (GC), particularly in high risk, advanced gastric cancer. Previous trials testing the efficacy of NAC have reported inconsistent results. This study compares the combined use of NAC and surgery with surgery alone for GC by using a meta-analytic approach. We performed an electronic search of PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on NAC published before Oct 2015. The primary outcome of the studies was data on survival rates for patients with GC. The summary results were pooled using the random-effects model. We included 12 prospective RCTs reporting data on 1538 GC patients. Patients who received NAC were associated with significant improvement of OS (P = 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001). Furthermore, NAC therapy significantly increased the incidence of 1-year survival rate (SR) (P = 0.020), 3-year SR (P = 0.011), and 4-year SR (P = 0.001). Similarly, NAC therapy was associated with a lower incidence of 1-year (P < 0.001), 2-year (P < 0.001), 3-year (P < 0.001), 4-year (P = 0.001), and 5-year recurrence rate (P = 0.002). Conversely, patients who received NAC also experienced a significantly increased risk of lymphocytopenia (P = 0.003), and hemoglobinopathy (P = 0.021). The findings of this study suggested that NAC is associated with significant improvement in the outcomes of survival and disease progression for GC patients while also increasing some toxicity.

Previous meta-analyses reporting significant associations between perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions and poor prognosis in gastric cancer or colorectal cancer had a high risk of confounding bias. This meta-analysis explored this issue using observational studies that applied propensity score analysis. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for manuscripts published between 2013 and 2022. Studies applying propensity score analysis were included to investigate the association between perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions and prognosis in gastric cancer or colorectal cancer after radical surgery. Pooled HRs for overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated using a fixed-effect model or random-effect model according to heterogeneity. Twelve retrospective cohort studies with 17 607 patients reported were included. Ten studies applied propensity score matching and two applied inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. A total of 5962 patients were analysed after propensity score adjustment. After propensity score adjustment, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions did not correlate with disease-free survival in gastric cancer (HR 1.16; 95 per cent c.i. 0.96–1.39; heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-squared test and inconsistency index (I²) = 57 per cent) or colorectal cancer (HR 1.12; 95 per cent c.i. 0.84–1.49; I² = 54 per cent). However, after propensity score adjustment, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions were significantly associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer (HR 1.20; 95 per cent c.i. 1.08–1.32; I² = 25 per cent) and colorectal cancer (HR 1.40; 95 per cent c.i. 1.06–1.85; I² = 52 per cent). Subgroup analyses showed that perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions did not correlate with overall survival in colorectal cancer when major postoperative complications were balanced after propensity score. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion is not correlated with recurrence of gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions are significantly associated with worse overall survival in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer, which may be attributable to unbalanced major postoperative complications after propensity score adjustment.