Although Meigs' syndrome is regarded as a well-defined entity, contradictory data on pleural fluid characteristics have been presented, with some papers classifying it as a transudate, whereas others stating that it is an exudate.The aims of the study were: (1) to evaluate pleural fluid characteristics in patients with Meigs' syndrome and (2) to analyze the prevalence of transudative and exudative pleural effusion in relation to the applied definition of the syndrome.We performed a search through medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR) to identify papers on Meigs' syndrome published between 1940 and 2013. Two authors independently reviewed each paper searching for prespecified data: (1) signs and symptoms, (2) tumor characteristics, (3) clinical and laboratory data on ascites, (4) clinical, radiological, and laboratory data on pleural fluid, (5) clinical course after tumor removal. All case reports were reclassified according to a new unequivocal classification of Meigs' syndrome-related entities.A total of 653 papers were initially identified, and 454 articles reporting 541 patients were included in the final analysis. After reclassification according to our case definitions, there were 196, 113, and 108 patients defined as classic Meigs' syndrome, nonclassic Meigs' syndrome, and pseudo-Meigs' syndrome, respectively. Significantly more patients presented with right-sided than left-sided and bilateral pleural effusions (P < 0.001). Median volume of withdrawn pleural fluid was 2950 (1500-6000) mL. The classification of pleural effusion with the use of Light's criteria was possible in only 7 patients. In 6 of these patients pleural effusion met the criteria for an exudate. When the protein concentration > 3.0 g/dL was applied as a criterion of pleural exudate, 88.8% (80/90) of effusions were classified as exudates. Increasing the cut-off level to 3.5 g/dL resulted in only a modest decrease in the percentage of exudative effusions (81%, 73/90).Surprisingly few reports on Meigs' syndrome present data reliably defining the character of pleural effusion. The available data indicate, however, that the majority of pleural effusions in patients with this entity are exudates. This finding may be a prerequisite for the verification of some earlier presented concepts.

Podstawowym celem tego dokumentu jest opracowanie spójnych wytycznych dotyczących wskazań, przeciwwskazań, metodyki i zasad interpretacji testu 6-minutowego chodu (6MWT, 6 min walk test) w ramach codziennej praktyki szpitalnej i ambulatoryjnej

INTRODUCTION Melatonin secretion, one of the main factors controlling the sleep-wake rhythm, may be disrupted in patients with sleep disorders. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to evaluate the profile of circadian melatonin secretion in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to assess the impact of 2-day and 3-month treatment with continuous airway pressure (CPAP) on diurnal and nocturnal serum melatonin levels. PATIENTS AND METHODS Serum melatonin levels were evaluated in 71 untreated patients with OSA and 18 healthy controls at 6 time points: 10 AM, 2 PM, 6 PM, 10 PM, 2 AM, and 6 AM. The measurements were repeated after 2 days and 3 months of CPAP treatment. RESULTS Melatonin secretion rhythm was altered in 25.4% of the patients with OSA. In patients with preserved secretion rhythm, the serum melatonin level was significantly lower at 2 AM and 6 AM, compared with healthy controls: 68.2 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 30.1-109.8 pg/ml) vs 109.1 pg/ml (IQR, 63-167.9 pg/ml), P = 0.02 and 40.8 pg/ml (IQR, 20.8-73.2 pg/ml) vs 67.7 pg/ml (IQR, 32.7-131.7 pg/ml), P = 0.04, respectively. Melatonin levels did not change significantly after the 2-day and 3-month CPAP treatment. However, at 3 months, a shift of the peak melatonin concentration to 2 AM was observed in patients with an altered secretion rhythm. CONCLUSIONS OSA has a significant effect on serum melatonin levels. Neither short-term nor long-term CPAP treatment significantly changes melatonin concentrations; however, our results seem to indicate that a 3-month CPAP treatment may be helpful in restoring the physiological rhythm of melatonin secretion in patients with OSA.

To evaluate the diagnostic value of four different tumor markers: cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in patients with malignant and non-malignant pleural effusion. One hundred and two patients with pleural effusion treated in the University Hospital in Warsaw between 2001 and 2003 were studied. They underwent an extensive, diagnostic work-up in order to determine the pleural effusion etiology. Patients with known pleural fluid etiology were labeled as the study group and submitted for further analysis. Pleural fluid and serum samples for CA-125, CEA, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE measurements were collected during the first thoracentesis, centrifuged, and frozen until further use. Pleural fluid and serum concentration of tumor markers were assessed by electrochemiluminescence methods using commercial kits. 74 patients (32 M, 42 F; mean age 65 ± 14 years) composed the final study group. Exudative pleural effusion was found in 62 patients; of these 36 were malignant (48.6% of all effusions), 20 parapneumonic (or pleural empyema), and 6 tuberculous. In 12 patients, pleural transudate was diagnosed. The highest diagnostic sensitivity for malignant pleural effusion was found for NSE (94.4% and 80.6% in the pleural fluid and serum, respectively). However, the specificity of NSE measurement was relatively low (36.1% and 47.4% in pleural fluid and serum, respectively). The most specific markers of malignant pleural fluid etiology were pleural fluid CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels (92.1% and 92.1%, respectively). CA-125 was found to be the most specific serum marker of pleural malignancies (78.9%). The AUC for combined pleural markers was 0.89, combined serum markers 0.82, combined ratio pleural/serum markers 0.88. There are significant differences between the diagnostic value of various pleural fluid and serum markers. Overall, pleural fluid markers are superior to serum markers in determining the pleural fluid etiology. A combination of two or more tumor markers may help improve their diagnostic accuracy. Pleural fluid and serum measurements of different tumor markers play a limited role in the differentiation between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions.