Alessia Marcassoli

Dr. Alessia Marcassoli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
AMAlessia Marcassoli
Alessia Marcassoli
MLMatilde Leonardi
Matilde Leonardi
MPMarco Passavanti
Marco Passavanti
VAValerio De Angelis
Valerio De Angelis
EBEnrico Bentivegna
Enrico Bentivegna
ARAlberto Raggi
Alberto Raggi
(1) Objectives: to investigate the main lessons learned from the public health (PH) response to COVID-19, using the global perspective endorsed by the WHO pillars, and understand what countries have learned from their practical actions. (2) Methods: we searched for articles in PubMed and CINAHL from 1 January 2020 to 31 January 2022. 455 articles were included. Inclusion criteria were PH themes and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. One hundred and forty-four articles were finally included in a detailed scoping review. (3) Findings: 78 lessons learned were available, cited 928 times in the 144 articles. Our review highlighted 5 main lessons learned among the WHO regions: need for continuous coordination between PH institutions and organisations (1); importance of assessment and evaluation of risk factors for the diffusion of COVID-19, identifying vulnerable populations (2); establishment of evaluation systems to assess the impact of planned PH measures (3); extensive application of digital technologies, telecommunications and electronic health records (4); need for periodic scientific reviews to provide regular updates on the most effective PH management strategies (5). (4) Conclusion: lessons found in this review could be essential for the future, providing recommendations for an increasingly flexible, fast and efficient PH response to a healthcare emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

25 November 2024 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AFArianna Fornari
Arianna Fornari
MLMartina Lanza
Martina Lanza
EGErika Guastafierro
Erika Guastafierro
AMAlessia Marcassoli
Alessia Marcassoli
PSPietro Sismondo
Pietro Sismondo
MLMatilde Leonardi
Matilde Leonardi
Background and purpose: Health disparities and inequities are an important and too long overlooked public health concern worldwide. These differences in health and health care can affect people with any disease, including neurological disorders. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an updated overview of the main health inequities faced by neurological patients worldwide, to plan valuable interventions.Methods: Main databases were searched systematically. Quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. This review followed the standard guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses.Results: A total of 1797 studies were obtained, of which 49 studies were included in the final round and subjected to quality appraisal. Quality assessment yielded scores ranging from 20% to 100%. The results were divided based on the nature of inequities: (i) socioeconomic disadvantage (n = 25); and (ii) access to care, treatment, and services inequities (n = 24). Most studies were conducted in high income counties (n = 46, 93.8%) and reported health inequities in persons with cerebrovascular diseases, especially stroke (n = 20, 40.8%), followed by multiple sclerosis (n = 8, 16.3%) and neurodegenerative disorders (n = 6, 12.2%).Conclusions: Racial and ethnic discrimination, economic issues, differences in disease management, educational level, and place of residence are the main inequities reported by neurological patients. The USA dominates the research panorama (n = 36, 73.4%), highlighting the need for more studies that cover other geopolitical contexts. Improving population health means improving health for everyone; however, historically disadvantaged groups continue to trail dramatically behind, and actions are needed to reduce the inequities.

17 January 2023 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLicia Grazzi
Licia Grazzi
DMDanilo Antonio Montisano
Danilo Antonio Montisano
PRPaul Rizzoli
Paul Rizzoli
EGErika Guastafierro
Erika Guastafierro
AMAlessia Marcassoli
Alessia Marcassoli
ARAlberto Raggi
Alberto Raggi
Pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia are commonly altered in patients with chronic migraine associated with medication overuse headache (CM-MOH) and tend to improve in parallel with clinical improvement. The relation between pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia is poorly understood in patients with CM-MOH receiving OnabotulinumtoxinA therapy. In this single-arm open-label longitudinal observational study, patients with CM-MOH were assigned to structured withdrawal and then administered OnabotulinumtoxinA (5 sessions on a three-month basis, 195 UI per 31 sites). Headache frequency, medication intake, disability, impact, cutaneous allodynia and pain catastrophizing were evaluated with specific questionnaires. In total, 96 patients were enrolled and 79 completed the 12-month follow-up. With the exclusion of cutaneous allodynia and the magnification subscale of the pain catastrophizing questionnaire, all variables showed significant improvement by the sixth month, which was maintained at 12 months. Reduction of pain catastrophizing, and particularly of its helplessness subscale, was a significant predictor of reduction in headache frequency and medication intake. Pain catastrophizing is often implicated in the clinical improvement in patients with CM-MOH receiving behavioral treatments, but, in this study, also showed a role in patients receiving OnabotulinumtoxinA; combining OnabotulinumtoxinA and behavioral treatments specifically addressing pain catastrophizing might further enhance patients’ clinical outcome.

LGLicia Grazzi
Licia Grazzi
ARAlberto Raggi
Alberto Raggi
EGErika Guastafierro
Erika Guastafierro
MPMarco Passavanti
Marco Passavanti
AMAlessia Marcassoli
Alessia Marcassoli
DDDomenico D’Amico
Domenico D’Amico
This preliminary analysis of a single-blind phase-III RCT aims to compare the feasibility and short-term efficacy of mindfulness as an add-on to treatment as usual (TaU) in the management of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH). Patients were randomized to either TaU (structured withdrawal of overused drugs, patient education and pharmacological prophylaxis) or TaU + MIND, wherein patients additionally received six 90 min weekly group sessions of mindfulness-based therapy. Repeated measures analyses were used to test whether patients in the two arms showed different course with regard to headache frequency and medication intake over a three-month period. Drop-out rates were not different between the two groups: 6/89 (6.7%) and 9/88 (10.2%) among those in TaU and TaU + MIND, respectively. A significant effect of time for all variables was shown, together with a significant effect of time by group, favoring TaU + MIND condition for headache frequency (p = 0.025) and NSAID intake (p = 0.007), controlling for age and CM duration. In total, 45/83 (54.2%) and 69/79 (75.9%) of the patients allocated to TaU and TaU + MIND, respectively, achieved 50% or more headache-day reduction (chi-squared 8.38, p = 0.004). Our preliminary analysis indicates that adding six mindfulness-based sessions to TaU was feasible and showed short-term efficacy in the treatment of patients with CM and MOH.


27 May 2022 in Neurological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAlberto Raggi
Alberto Raggi
LGLicia Grazzi
Licia Grazzi
EGErika Guastafierro
Erika Guastafierro
AMAlessia Marcassoli
Alessia Marcassoli
MPMarco Passavanti
Marco Passavanti
DDDomenico D’Amico
Domenico D’Amico