INTRODUCTION: Duodenal epithelial barrier impairment and immune activation may play a role in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia (FD). This study was aimed to evaluate the duodenal epithelium of patients with FD and healthy individuals for detectable microscopic structural abnormalities. METHODS: This is a prospective study using esophagogastroduodenoscopy enhanced with duodenal confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) and mucosal biopsies in patients with FD (n = 16) and healthy controls (n = 18). Blinded CLE images analysis evaluated the density of epithelial gaps (cell extrusion zones), a validated endoscopic measure of the intestinal barrier status. Analyses of the biopsied duodenal mucosa included standard histology, quantification of mucosal immune cells/cytokines, and immunohistochemistry for inflammatory epithelial cell death called pyroptosis. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was measured using Ussing chambers. Epithelial cell-to-cell adhesion proteins expression was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Patients with FD had significantly higher epithelial gap density on CLE in the distal duodenum than that of controls (P = 0.002). These mucosal abnormalities corresponded to significant changes in the duodenal biopsy samples of patients with FD, compared with controls, including impaired mucosal integrity by TEER (P = 0.009) and increased number of epithelial cells undergoing pyroptosis (P = 0.04). Reduced TEER inversely correlated with the severity of certain dyspeptic symptoms. Furthermore, patients with FD demonstrated altered duodenal expression of claudin-1 and interleukin-6. No differences in standard histology were found between the groups. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of duodenal CLE abnormalities in patients with FD, corroborated by biopsy findings of epithelial barrier impairment and increased cell death, implicating that duodenal barrier disruption is a pathogenesis factor in FD and introducing CLE a potential diagnostic biomarker in FD.

Gastric motility abnormalities are common in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction, such as functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Accurate assessment of the gastric motility in these common disorders can help understand the underlying pathophysiology and guide effective treatment. A variety of clinically applicable diagnostic methods have been developed to objectively evaluate the presence of gastric dysmotility, including tests of gastric accommodation, antroduodenal motility, gastric emptying, and gastric myoelectrical activity. The aim of this mini review is to summarize the advances in clinically available diagnostic methods for evaluation of gastric motility and describe the advantages and disadvantages of each test.

Background: Treatment options for abdominal pain in IBS are inadequate. TEA was reported effective treatment of disorders of gut–brain interaction but its mechanism of action and optimal delivery method for treating pain in IBS are unknown. This study aims to determine the most effective TEA parameter and location to treat abdominal pain in patients with IBS‐Constipation and delineate the effect of TEA on rectal sensation and autonomic function. Methods: Nineteen IBS‐C patients underwent TEA at acupoints ST36 (leg), PC6 (wrist), or sham‐acupoint. Each patient was studied in five randomized sessions on separate days: (1) TEA/ST36‐100 Hz; (2) TEA/ST36‐25 Hz; (3) TEA/PC6‐100 Hz; (4) TEA/PC6‐25 Hz; (5) TEA/Sham‐25 Hz. In each session, barostat‐guided rectal distention (RD) was performed before and after TEA. Patients graded the RD‐induced pain and recorded three rectal sensation thresholds. A heart rate variability (HRV) signal was derived from the electrocardiogram for autonomic function assessment. Key Results: Studied patients were predominantly female, young, and Caucasian. Compared with baseline, patients treated with TEA/ST36‐100 Hz had significantly decreased pain scores at RD pressure‐points 20–50 mmHg ( p < 0.04). The average pain reduction was 40%. Post‐treatment scores did not change significantly with other TEA modalities except with sham‐TEA (lesser degree compared to ST36‐100 Hz, p = 0.04). TEA/ST36‐100, but not other modalities, increased the rectal sensation threshold (first sensation: p = 0.007; urge to defecate: p < 0.026). TEA/ST36‐100 Hz was the only treatment that significantly decreased sympathetic activity and increased parasympathetic activity with and without RD ( p < 0.04). Conclusions & Inferences: TEA at ST36‐100 Hz is superior stimulation point/parameter, compared to TEA at PC‐6/sham‐TEA, to reduce rectal distension‐induced pain in IBS‐C patients. This therapeutic effect appears to be mediated through rectal hypersensitivity reduction and autonomic function modulation.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of opioids on anorectal function is poorly understood but potentially relevant to the pathogenesis of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). To evaluate anorectal function testing (AFT) characteristics, symptom burden, and quality of life in chronically constipated patients prescribed an opioid (OIC) in comparison with constipated patients who are not on an opioid (NOIC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 3,452 (OIC = 588 and NOIC = 2,864) chronically constipated patients (Rome 3) who completed AFT. AFT variables included anal sphincter pressure and response during simulated defecation, balloon expulsion test (BET), and rectal sensation. Dyssynergic defecation (DD) was defined as an inability to relax the anal sphincter during simulated defecation and an abnormal BET. Patients completed Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 49 years. Most patients were women (82%) and whites (83%). Patients with OIC were older than NOIC patients (50.7 vs 48.3, P = 0.001). OIC patients were significantly more likely to have DD (28.6% vs 21.4%, P < 0.001), an abnormal simulated defecation response on anorectal manometry (59% vs 43.8%, P < 0.001), and an abnormal BET (48% vs 42.5%, P = 0.02) than NOIC patients. OIC patients reported more severe constipation symptoms (P < 0.02) and worse quality of life (P < 0.05) than NOIC patients. DISCUSSION: Chronically constipated patients who use opioids are more likely to have DD and more severe constipation symptoms than NOIC.

Background: Several complications of cirrhosis are theorized to result from the translocation of bacteria or their products across the intestinal epithelium. We aimed to assess epithelial permeability and associations with mucosal bacteria in patients with cirrhosis. Approach and Results: We collected 247 duodenum, ileum, and colon biopsies from 58 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and 33 controls during clinically indicated endoscopies. Patients with cirrhosis were similarly aged to controls (60 vs. 58 y) and had a median Model for End-stage Liver Disease of 8 (interquartile range 7, 10). Biopsies underwent 16S rRNA-encoding gene amplicon sequencing to determine mucosal bacteria composition and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) to determine epithelial permeability. In the entire cohort, there were regional differences in TEER with the lowest TEER (ie, more permeable) in the ileum; duodenum TEER was 43% higher and colon TEER 20% higher than ileum TEER (ANOVA p = 0.0004). When comparing patients with cirrhosis and controls, both TEER (26% lower in cirrhosis, p = 0.006) and alpha diversity differed in the duodenum (27% lower in cirrhosis, p = 0.01) but not ileum or colon. A beta-binomial model found that 26 bacteria were significantly associated with TEER. Bifidobacteriaceae Bifidobacterium in duodenal mucosa was protective of epithelial permeability and future hospitalization for hepatic decompensation. Conclusions: Duodenal epithelial permeability was higher, and mucosal bacteria alpha diversity was lower in cirrhosis compared to controls, while no such differences were seen in the ileum or colon. Specific bacteria were associated with epithelial permeability and future hepatic decompensation.