Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), caused by the PRRS virus (PRRSV), is a highly pathogenic porcine virus that brings tremendous economic losses to the global swine industry. PRRSVs have evolved multiple elegant strategies to manipulate the host proteins and circumvent against the antiviral responses to establish infection. Therefore, the identification of virus–host interactions is critical for understanding the pathogenesis of PRRSVs. Tripartite motif protein 28 (TRIM28) is a transcriptional co-repressor involved in the regulation of viral and cellular transcriptional programs; however, its precise role in regulating PRRSV infection remains unknown. In this study, we found that the mRNA and protein levels of TRIM28 were up-regulated in PRRSV-infected porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) and MARC-145 cells. Ectopic TRIM28 expression dramatically increased viral yields, whereas the siRNA-mediated knockdown of TRIM28 significantly inhibited PRRSV replication. Furthermore, we used a co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assay to demonstrate that TRIM28 interacted with envelope glycoprotein 4 (GP4) among PRRSV viral proteins. Intriguingly, TRIM28 inhibited the degradation of PRRSV GP4 by impeding its ubiquitination. Taken together, our work provides evidence that the host E3-ubiquitin ligase TRIM28 suppresses GP4 ubiquitination and is important for efficient virus replication. Therefore, our study identifies a new host factor, TRIM28, as a potential target in the development of anti-viral drugs against PRRSV.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) causes enormous economic losses each year in the swine industry worldwide. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles during viral infections via modulating the expression of viral or host genes at the posttranscriptional level.

Autophagy is an important biological process in host defense against viral infection. However, many viruses have evolved various strategies to disrupt the host antiviral system. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a typical immunosuppressive virus with a large economic impact on the swine industry. At present, studies on the escape mechanism of PRRSV in the autophagy process, especially through chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), are limited. This study confirmed that PRRSV glycoprotein 5 (GP5) could disrupt the formation of the GFAP-LAMP2A complex by inhibiting the MTORC2/PHLPP1/GFAP pathway, promoting the dissociation of the pGFAP-EF1α complex, and blocking the K63-linked polyubiquitination of LAMP2A to inhibit the activity of CMA. Further research demonstrated that CMA plays an anti-PRRSV role by antagonizing nonstructural protein 11 (NSP11)-mediated inhibition of type I interferon (IFN-I) signaling. Taken together, these results indicate that PRRSV GP5 inhibits the antiviral effect of CMA by targeting LAMP2A. This research provides new insight into the escape mechanism of immunosuppressive viruses in CMA. IMPORTANCE: Viruses have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to manipulate autophagy to evade degradation and immune responses. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a typical immunosuppressive virus that causes enormous economic losses in the swine industry. However, the mechanism by which PRRSV manipulates autophagy to defend against host antiviral effects remains unclear. In this study, we found that PRRSV GP5 interacts with LAMP2A and disrupts the formation of the GFAP-LAMP2A complex, thus inhibiting the activity of CMA and subsequently enhancing the inhibitory effect of the NSP11-mediated IFN-I signaling pathway, ultimately facilitating PRRSV replication. Our study revealed a novel mechanism by which PRRSV escapes host antiviral effects through CMA, providing a potential host target, LAMP2A, for developing antiviral drugs and contributing to understanding the escape mechanism of immunosuppressive viruses.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is a disease caused by PRRS virus (PRRSV), which seriously harms the pig industry. Revealing the mechanism by which PRRSV inhibits immune response will help prevent and control PRRS. Here, we found that PRRSV-2 may hijack host miR-541-3p to inhibit host innate immune response. Firstly, this work showed that miR-541-3p mimics could facilitate the replication of PRRSV-2 and the results of the quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) showed that PRRSV-2 could up-regulate the expression of miR-541-3p in MARC-145 cells. Since previous studies have shown that type I interferon could effectively inhibit the replication of PRRSV-2, the present work explored whether miR-541-3p regulated the expression of type I interferon and found that miR-541-3p could negatively regulate the transcription of type I interferon by targeting interferon regulatory factor 7 (IRF7). More importantly, PRRSV-2 infection could down-regulate the expression of IRF7 and over-expression of IRF7 could down-regulate the replication of PRRSV-2 in MARC-145 cells. In conclusion, PRRSV-2 infection up-regulated the expression of miR-541-3p to promote its replication in MARC-145 cells, since miR-541-3p can negatively regulate the transcription of type I interferon by targeting IRF7.

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) are economically important pathogens in swine, and pigs with dual infections of PCV2 and PRRSV consistently have more severe clinical symptoms and interstitial pneumonia. However, the synergistic pathogenesis mechanism induced by PRRSV and PCV2 co-infection has not yet been illuminated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the kinetic changes of immune regulatory molecules, inflammatory factors and immune checkpoint molecules in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) in individuals infected or co-infected with PRRSV and/or PCV2. The experiment was divided into six groups: a negative control group (mock, no infected virus), a group infected with PCV2 alone (PCV2), a group infected with PRRSV alone (PRRSV), a PCV2–PRRSV co-infected group (PCV2–PRRSV inoculated with PCV2, followed by PRRSV 12 h later), a PRRSV–PCV2 co-infected group (PRRSV–PCV2 inoculated with PRRSV, followed by PCV2 12 h later) and a PCV2 + PRRSV co-infected group (PCV2 + PRRSV, inoculated with PCV2 and PRRSV at the same time). Then, PAM samples from the different infection groups and the mock group were collected at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h post-infection (hpi) to detect the viral loads of PCV2 and PRRSV and the relative quantification of immune regulatory molecules, inflammatory factors and immune checkpoint molecules. The results indicated that PCV2 and PRRSV co-infection, regardless of the order of infection, had no effect on promoting PCV2 replication, while PRRSV and PCV2 co-infection was able to promote PRRSV replication. The immune regulatory molecules (IFN-α and IFN-γ) were significantly down-regulated, while inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10 and TGF-β) and immune checkpoint molecules (PD-1, LAG-3, CTLA-4 and TIM-3) were significantly up-regulated in the PRRSV and PCV2 co-infection groups, especially in PAMs with PCV2 inoculation first followed by PRRSV. The dynamic changes in the aforementioned immune molecules were associated with a high viral load, immunosuppression and cell exhaustion, which may explain, at least partially, the underlying mechanism of the enhanced pulmonary lesions by dual infection with PCV2 and PRRSV in PAMs.

The antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) effect of a PRRSV infection is that the preexisting sub- or non-neutralizing antibodies specific against PRRSV can facilitate the virus entry and replication, and it is likely to be a great obstacle for the selection of immune strategies and the development of high-efficiency PRRSV vaccines. However, the proteomic characterization of primary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) with a PRRSV-ADE infection has not yet been investigated so far. Therefore, we performed a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitative proteomic analysis of PAMs with a PRRSV-ADE infection in this study. The results showed that a total of 3935 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified in the PAMs infected with PRRSV-ADE, including 2004 up-regulated proteins and 1931 down-regulated proteins. Further, the bioinformatics analysis for these DEPs revealed that a PRRSV-ADE infection might disturb the functions of ribosome, proteasome and mitochondria. Interestingly, we also found that the expression of the key molecules in the innate immune pathways and antiviral proteins were significantly down-regulated during a PRRSV-ADE infection. This study was the first attempt to analyze the proteomic characterization of PAMs with a PRRSV-ADE infection in vitro. Additionally, the findings will provide valuable information for a better understanding of the mechanism of virus–antibody–host interactions during a PRRSV-ADE infection.