Introduction: traumatic brain injury (TBI) is very often associated with spasticity. Medical interventions may include medications such as baclofen, a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) -receptor agonist of poor lipid solubility. Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) administration is a contemporary treatment option which minimizes adverse effects in contrast with the oral form of the drug. Regarding low urinary tract dysfunction, TBI, as a suprapontine lesion, results in neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Frequency, urgency and urge incontinence are the predominant signs and symptoms of this condition. Our study aims to report the potential changes in bladder function in patients with spasticity, due to TBI, after the implantation of the baclofen pump and the control of spasticity. Material and Methods: We report three cases of TBI whose spasticity responded well to ITB. We evaluated our medical reports regarding bladder function retrospectively, before and after baclofen pump implantation. We compared the data of bladder diaries and urodynamic parameters. Results: Bladder function was improved in all patients. Regarding bladder diaries; the number of incontinence and micturition episodes was decreased and the volume per void was slightly increased. Regarding urodynamic parameters; bladder capacity and reflex volume increased, Pdetmax decreased, PVR was the same and DLPP was slightly decreased. Conclusions: Although the baclofen pump is implanted to treat spasticity, detrusor activity may be also affected. Therefore, patients’ urologic profiles should also be reevaluated after ITB. Further prospective studies are required to investigate the effect of ITB on bladder function in the clinical field and also at the basic science level.

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a leading cause of chronic disability. Loss of upper extremity (U.E.) function is central to limitations, in mobility, postural control, transfers, and self-care. The aim of this exploratory pilot study was to investigate whether self-reported UE function is associated with independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) in people with motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Methods: Eleven (n = 11) individuals with motor-incomplete tetraplegia (AIS C–D; neurological levels C4–T1; injury duration ≥ 1 year), recruited through convenience sampling from five specialist rehabilitation centres, participated in an exploratory cross-sectional pilot study designed to generate hypotheses rather than test them. U.E. function was assessed using the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire, selected for its ability to capture pain and task-related functional difficulty in the elbow, wrist, and hand; its application in this neurological population is considered exploratory. Independence in ADLs was evaluated using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III). Given the small sample, all analyses were primarily descriptive and along with bivariate associations (Spearman correlations). Regression findings are reported strictly for exploratory purposes. Results: The median age was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] 43–55). A strong negative correlation was observed between PRTEE total score and SCIM III (r_s = −0.76). In an exploratory univariate analysis, each 1-point increase in PRTEE total score was associated with a 1.3-point lower SCIM III score (β = −1.3, 95% CI −2.34 to −0.26, p = 0.02). Age also showed a positive association (β = 1.31, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.58, p = 0.05) with SCIM III; however, this finding is highly likely to reflect a statistical artefact of the small and unrepresentative sample. Multivariable regression was not conducted as a primary analysis due to insufficient statistical power. All findings should be treated as strictly exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Conclusions: Self-reported U.E. function appears to be associated with ADL independence in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. U.E. capacity may contribute to functional tasks requiring postural stability and mobility-related activities, but no predictive inferences can be made from this underpowered, convenience sample. Future studies with larger cohorts and performance-based measures are needed to confirm these preliminary observations and clarify the role of U.E. function in rehabilitation planning.