The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) was recently proposed as a non-insulin-based, novel index for assessing insulin resistance (IR) in the Western population. However, evidence for the link between METS-IR and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among the elderly Chinese population was still limited. We aimed to investigate the associations between METS-IR and prediabetes or T2DM based on large-scale, cross-sectional, routine physical examination data. In a total of 18,112 primary care service users, an increased METS-IR was independently associated with a higher prevalence of prediabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.457, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.343 to 1.581, p < 0.001) and T2DM (aOR = 1.804, 95%CI: 1.720 to 1.891, p < 0.001), respectively. The aOR for prediabetes in subjects with the highest quartile of METS-IR was 3.060-fold higher than that in those with the lowest quartile of METS-IR. The aOR for T2DM in subjects with the highest quartile of METS-IR was 6.226-fold higher than that in those with the lowest quartile of METS-IR. Consistent results were obtained in subgroup analyses. Our results suggested that METS-IR was significantly associated with both prediabetes and T2DM. The monitoring of METS-IR may add value to early identification of individuals at risk for glucose metabolism disorders in primary care.

Aims: To assess longitudinal changes in blood pressure (BP) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in primary care patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to explore factors associated with patients' inability to improve BP and FPG at follow-up.Methods: We constructed a closed cohort in the context of the national basic public health (BPH) service provision in an urbanised township in southern China. Primary care patients who had concomitant hypertension and T2DM were retrospectively followed up from 2016 to 2019. Data were retrieved electronically from the computerised BPH platform. Patient-level risk factors were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: We included 5,398 patients (mean age 66 years; range 28.9 to 96.1 years). At baseline, almost half [48.3% (2,608/5,398)] of patients had uncontrolled BP or FPG. During follow-up, more than one-fourth [27.2% (1,467/5,398)] of patients had no improvement in both BP and FPG. Among all patients, we observed significant increases in systolic BP [2.31 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.04 to 2.59, p < 0.001], diastolic BP (0.73 mmHg, 0.54 to 0.92, p < 0.001), and FPG (0.12 mmol/l, 0.09 to 0.15, p < 0.001) at follow-up compared to baseline. In addition to changes in body mass index [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.045, 1.003 to 1.089, p = 0.037], poor adherence to lifestyle advice (aOR = 1.548, 1.356 to 1.766, p < 0.001), and unwillingness to actively enrol in health-care plans managed by the family doctor team (aOR = 1.379, 1.128 to 1.685, p = 0.001) were factors associated with no improvement in BP and FPG at follow-up.Conclusion: A suboptimal control of BP and FPG remains an ongoing challenge to primary care patients with concomitant hypertension and T2DM in real-world community settings. Tailored actions aiming to improve patients' adherence to healthy lifestyles, expand the delivery of team-based care, and encourage weight control should be incorporated into routine healthcare planning for community-based cardiovascular prevention.