Purpose: Over the past twenty years, anti-HER2 targeted therapies have proven to be a revolution in the management of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers. Anti-HER2 therapies administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy have been specifically studied. Unfortunately, the safety of anti-HER2 therapies in combination with radiation remains largely unknown. Thus, we propose a literature review of the risks and safety of combining radiotherapy with anti-HER2 therapies. We will focus on the benefit/risk rationale and try to understand the risk of toxicity in early-stage and advanced breast cancer. Methods: Research was carried out on the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrial.gov, Medline, and Web of Science for the terms “radiotherapy”, “radiation therapy”, “radiosurgery”, “local ablative therapy”, and “stereotactic”, combined with “trastuzumab”, “pertuzumab”, “trastuzumab emtansine”, “TDM-1”, “T-Dxd”, “trastuzumab deruxtecan”, “tucatinib”, “lapatinib”, “immune checkpoint inhibitors”, “atezolizumab”, “pembrolizumab”, “nivolumab”, “E75 vaccine”, “interferon”, “anti-IL-2”, “anti-IL 12”, and “ADC”. Results: Association of radiation and monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab (with limited data) seems to be safe, with no excess risk of toxicity. Preliminary data with radiation and of antibody–drug conjugate of trastuzumab combined cytotoxic (trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan), given the underlying mechanism of action, suggest that one must be particularly cautious with the association. The safety of the combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lapatinib, tucatinib) and radiation remains under-studied. The available evidence suggests that checkpoint inhibitors can be safely administrated with radiation. Conclusions: HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies and checkpoint inhibitors can be combined with radiation, apparently with no excess toxicities. Caution is required when associating radiation with TKI and antibody drugs, considering the limited evidence.

The standard of care for metastatic disease is systemic therapy. A unique subset of patients with limited metastatic disease defined as distant involvement of five anatomic sites or less (oligometastases) have a better chance of remission or improved survival and may benefit from local treatments such as surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, to prevent further spread of disease, systemic treatment such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and hormonal therapy may be required. Older patients (70 years old or above) or physiologically frail younger patients with multiple co-morbidities may not be able to tolerate the conventional chemotherapy due to its toxicity. In addition, those with a good performance status may not receive optimal chemotherapy due to concern about toxicity. Recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become a promising approach only in the management of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. Thus, a treatment method that elicits induction of PD-L1 production by tumor cells may allow all patients with oligometastases to benefit from immunotherapy. In vitro studies have demonstrated that high dose of radiotherapy may induce formation of PD-L1 in various tumors as a defense mechanism against inflammatory T cells. Clinical studies also corroborated those observations. Thus, SBRT, with its high precision to minimize damage to normal organs, may be a potential treatment of choice for older patients with oligometastases due to its synergy with immunotherapy. We propose a protocol combining SBRT to achieve a minimum radiobiologic equivalent dose around 59.5 Gy to all tumor sites if feasible, followed four to six weeks later by CPI for those cancer patients with oligometastases. All patients will be screened with frailty screening questionnaires to identify individuals at high risk for toxicity. The patients will be managed with an interdisciplinary team which includes oncologists, geriatricians, nurses, nutritionists, patient navigators, and social workers to manage all aspects of geriatric patient care. The use of telemedicine by the team may facilitate patient monitoring during treatment and follow-up. Preliminary data on toxicity, local control, survival, and progression-free survival may be obtained and serve as a template for future prospective studies.

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess outcomes of SABR for metachronous isolated lung oligometastases from HNSCC. Methods: For patients who developed isolated, 1 or 2 lungs lesions (<5cm) consistent with metastases from HNSCC, the indication of SABR was validated in a multidisciplinary tumor board. All patients were monitored by CT or PET CT after SABR (Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation) for HNSCC. Results: Between November 2007 and February 2018, 52 patients were treated with SABR for metachronous lung metastases. The median time from the treatment of the primary HNSCC to the development of lung metastases was 18 months (3-93). The cohort’s median age was 65.5 years old (50-83). The vast majority (94.2%) received 60 Gy in three fractions. Forty-one patients (78.5%) presented a solitary lung metastasis, while 11 patients (21.5%) had two lung metastases. With a median follow-up of 45.3 months, crude local and metastatic control rates were 74 and 38%, respectively. 1 year and 2 year Overall Survival (OS) were 85.8 and 65.9%, respectively. The median OS was 46.8 months. About one-fourth of patients were retreated by SABR for distant pulmonary recurrence. The treatment was well tolerated with only one patient who reported ≥ grade 3 toxicity (1.9%). Conclusion: In selected metastatic HNSCC patients, early detection and treatment of lung metastases with SABR is effective and safe. Prospective studies are required to validate this potential shift. Advances in knowledge: Patients with oligometastases and controlled primary HNSCC seem to benefit from metastasis directed therapies.

The standard of care for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is either surgery combined with chemotherapy pre- or postoperatively or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, older and frail patients may not be candidates for surgery and chemotherapy due to the high mortality risk and are frequently referred to radiotherapy alone, which is better tolerated but carries a high risk of disease recurrence. Recently, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may induce a high response rate among cancer patients with positive programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Immunotherapy is also well tolerated among older patients. Laboratory and clinical studies have reported synergy between radiotherapy and ICI. The combination of ICI and radiotherapy may improve local control and survival for NSCLC patients who are not candidates for surgery and chemotherapy or decline these two modalities. The International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group proposes a protocol combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy based on the presence or absence of PD-L1 to optimize the survival of those patients.

The standard of care for locally advanced head and neck cancer is concurrent chemoradiation or postoperative irradiation with or without chemotherapy. Surgery may not be an option for older patients (70 years old or above) due to multiple co-morbidities and frailty. Additionally, the standard chemotherapy of cisplatin may not be ideal for those patients due to oto- and nephrotoxicity. Though carboplatin is a reasonable alternative for cisplatin in patients with a pre-existing hearing deficit or renal dysfunction, its efficacy may be inferior to cisplatin for head and neck cancer. In addition, concurrent chemoradiation is frequently associated with grade 3–4 mucositis and hematologic toxicity leading to poor tolerance among older cancer patients. Thus, a new algorithm needs to be developed to provide optimal local control while minimizing toxicity for this vulnerable group of patients. Recently, immunotherapy with check point inhibitors (CPI) has attracted much attention due to the high prevalence of program death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in head and neck cancer. In patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer refractory to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, CPI has proven to be superior to conventional chemotherapy for salvage. Those with a high PD-L1 expression defined as 50% or above or a high tumor proportion score (TPS) may have an excellent response to CPI. This selected group of patients may be candidates for CPI combined with modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated image-guided radiotherapy (IM-IGRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) or proton therapy if available, which allow for the sparing of critical structures, such as the salivary glands, oral cavity, cochlea, larynx and pharyngeal muscles, to improve the patients’ quality of life. In addition, normal organs that are frequently sensitive to immunotherapy, such as the thyroid and lungs, are spared with modern radiotherapy techniques. In fit or carefully selected frail patients, a hypofractionated schedule may be considered to reduce the need for daily transportation. We propose a protocol combining CPI and modern radiotherapy techniques for older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who are not eligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and have a high TPS. Prospective studies should be performed to verify this hypothesis.