The concept that photosynthetic flux is influenced by the accumulation of photo‐assimilate persisted for 100 years before receiving any strong experimental support. Precise analysis of the mechanisms of photosynthetic responses to sink activity required the development of a battery of appropriate molecular techniques and has benefited from contemporary interest in the effects of elevated CO₂ on photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is one of the most highly integrated and regulated metabolic processes to maximize the use of available light, to minimize the damaging effects of excess light and to optimize the use of limiting carbon and nitrogen resources. Hypotheses of feedback regulation must take account of this integration. In the short term, departure from homeostasis can lead to redox signals, which cause rapid changes in the transcription of genes encoding photosystems I and II. End‐product synthesis can exert short‐term metabolic feedback control through Pi recycling. Beyond this, carbohydrate accumulation in leaves when there is an imbalance between source and sink at the whole plant level can lead to decreased expression of photosynthetic genes and accelerated leaf senescence. In a high CO₂ world this may become a more prevalent feature of photosynthetic regulation. However, sink regulation of photosynthesis is highly dependent on the physiology of the rest of the plant. This physiological state regulates photosynthesis through signal transduction pathways that co‐ordinate the plant carbon : nitrogen balance, which match photosynthetic capacity to growth and storage capacity and underpin and can override the direct short‐term controls of photosynthesis by light and CO₂. Photosynthate supply and phytohormones, particularly cytokinins, interact with nitrogen supply to control the expression of photosynthesis genes, the development of leaves and the whole plant nitrogen distribution, which provides the dominant basis for sink regulation of photosynthesis.

Trehalose metabolism and signaling is an area of emerging significance. In less than a decade our views on the importance of trehalose metabolism and its role in plants have gone through something of a revolution. An obscure curiosity has become an indispensable regulatory system. Mutant and transgenic plants of trehalose synthesis display wide-ranging and unprecedented phenotypes for the perturbation of a metabolic pathway. Molecular physiology and genomics have provided a glimpse of trehalose biology that had not been possible with conventional techniques, largely because the products of the synthetic pathway, trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P) and trehalose, are in trace abundance and difficult to measure in most plants. A consensus is emerging that T6P plays a central role in the coordination of metabolism with development. The discovery of trehalose metabolism has been one of the most exciting developments in plant metabolism and plant science in recent years. The field is fast moving and this review highlights the most recent insights.

Trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) is a proposed signaling molecule in plants, yet how it signals was not clear. Here, we provide evidence that T6P functions as an inhibitor of SNF1-related protein kinase1 (SnRK1; AKIN10/AKIN11) of the SNF1-related group of protein kinases. T6P, but not other sugars and sugar phosphates, inhibited SnRK1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedling extracts strongly (50%) at low concentrations (1–20 μ m). Inhibition was noncompetitive with respect to ATP. In immunoprecipitation studies using antibodies to AKIN10 and AKIN11, SnRK1 catalytic activity and T6P inhibition were physically separable, with T6P inhibition of SnRK1 dependent on an intermediary factor. In subsequent analysis, T6P inhibited SnRK1 in extracts of all tissues analyzed except those of mature leaves, which did not contain the intermediary factor. To assess the impact of T6P inhibition of SnRK1 in vivo, gene expression was determined in seedlings expressing Escherichia coli otsA encoding T6P synthase to elevate T6P or otsB encoding T6P phosphatase to decrease T6P. SnRK1 target genes showed opposite regulation, consistent with the regulation of SnRK1 by T6P in vivo. Analysis of microarray data showed up-regulation by T6P of genes involved in biosynthetic reactions, such as genes for amino acid, protein, and nucleotide synthesis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and mitochondrial electron transport, which are normally down-regulated by SnRK1. In contrast, genes involved in photosynthesis and degradation processes, which are normally up-regulated by SnRK1, were down-regulated by T6P. These experiments provide strong evidence that T6P inhibits SnRK1 to activate biosynthetic processes in growing tissues.

Genes for trehalose metabolism are widespread in higher plants. Insight into the physiological role of the trehalose pathway outside of resurrection plant species is lacking. To address this lack of insight, we express Escherichia coli genes for trehalose metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana , which manipulates trehalose 6-phosphate (T6P) contents in the transgenic plants. Plants expressing otsA [encoding trehalose phosphate synthase (TPS)] accumulate T6P whereas those expressing either otsB [encoding trehalose phosphate phosphatase (TPP)] or treC [encoding trehalose phosphate hydrolase (TPH)] contain low levels of T6P. Expression of treF (encoding trehalase) yields plants with unaltered T6P content and a phenotype not distinguishable from wild type when grown on soil. The marked phenotype obtained of plants accumulating T6P is opposite to that of plants with low T6P levels obtained by expressing either TPP or TPH and consistent with a critical role for T6P in growth and development. Supplied sugar strongly inhibits growth of plants with reduced T6P content and leads to accumulation of respiratory intermediates. Remarkably, sugar improves growth of TPS expressors over wild type, a feat not previously accomplished by manipulation of metabolism. The data indicate that the T6P intermediate of the trehalose pathway controls carbohydrate utilization and thence growth via control of glycolysis in a manner analogous to that in yeast. Furthermore, embryolethal A. thaliana tps1 mutants are rescued by expression of E. coli TPS, but not by supply of trehalose, suggesting that T6P control over primary metabolism is indispensable for development.

Photosynthesis is regulated as a two‐way process. Light regulates the expression of genes for photosynthesis and the activity of the gene products (feedforward control). Rate of end‐product use down‐stream of the Calvin cycle, determined largely by nutrition and temperature, also affects photosynthetic activity and photosynthetic gene expression (feedback control). Whereas feedforward control ensures efficient light use, feedback mechanisms ensure that carbon flow is balanced through the pathways that produce and consume carbon, so that inorganic phosphate is recycled and nitrogen is distributed optimally to different processes to ensure growth and survival. Actual mechanisms are sketchy and complex, but carbon to nitrogen balance rather than carbon status per se is central to understanding carbon metabolite feedback control of photosynthesis. In addition to determining the activity of the metabolic machinery, carbon metabolite feedback mechanisms also regulate photosynthesis at the leaf level through the regulation of leaf development. This review summarizes the current sketchy, but growing, knowledge of the mechanisms through which carbon metabolite feedback mechanisms regulate leaf photosynthesis.