Objective: The unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) has been recently adopted for unilateral radiating arm pain due to cervical herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis. We systematically meta-analyzed clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and compared them with those of full-endoscopic PCF (FE-PCF).Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 29, 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were collected and analyzed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model. Clinical outcomes of the UBE-PCF were compared with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following PCF to evaluate the efficacy of UBE-PCF.Results: Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the random-effects meta-analysis, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, and VAS arm were significantly decreased after the UBE-PCF (p<0.001). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were significantly higher than MCID (p0.05). Overall incidence of complications of the UBE-PCF was 6.2% (24 of 390). The most common complication was dura tear (2.1%, 8 of 390). The incidence in overall complications was not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p=0.813).Conclusion: We found that the UBE-PCF significantly improved clinical outcomes. Regarding clinical outcomes and complications, the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were not significantly different. Therefore, the UBE-PCF would be an advantageous surgical option comparable to FE-PCF for unilateral radiating arm pain.

This study was conducted to verify the effect of an infection control education program, using flipped learning based on the ARCS model, for nursing students. The study was a mixed-method study, composed of a nonequivalent control group, a pretest-posttest design, and focus group interviews. The total number of participants was 37, with 18 in the experimental group and 19 in the control group. The mean age of the participants was 24.32 ± 5.60 years, consisting of three males (8.1%) and thirty-four females (91.9%). The collected data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects method. The data regarding experiences of participation were analyzed using conventional content analysis. The experimental group had a higher degree of learning motivation, self-directed learning ability, and confidence in infection control practice than the control group. In the results of the focus group interviews, the themes were derived from ‘Engaging learning experience, although difficult, in new ways of learning’. It was confirmed that the infection control education program, using flipped learning based on the ARCS model, was an effective intervention for improving nursing students’ self-directed learning ability. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to use the educational program developed in this study for infection control education for nursing students and new nurses.

Objective: The upper lumbar region has distinctive anatomical characteristics that contribute to the challenges of performing discectomy. We introduce far-lateral transforaminal unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) lumbar discectomy for central or paracentral disc herniations in the upper lumbar region.Methods: We conducted retrospective review of the patients who underwent a far-lateral transforaminal UBE lumbar discectomy at our institution from January 2018 to September 2024. The electronic medical records, operative records, and radiologic images of the patients were reviewed.Results: A total of 27 patients underwent far-lateral transforaminal UBE lumbar discectomy for central or paracentral disc herniations in the upper lumbar region. The patient had a mean age of 54.0 ± 13.7 years. Operation was performed at the L1–2 level in 3 patients (11.1%), L2–3 in 9 patients (33.3%), and L3–4 in 15 patients (55.6%). The patients were followed-up for a mean of 27.7 ± 19.3 months. The Oswestry Disability Index was significantly decreased from 36.3 ± 6.8 preoperatively to 3.7 ± 3.3 at last follow-up (p < 0.001). The visual analogue scale (VAS) back was significantly decreased from 7.8 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 3.1 ± 0.6 postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001). The VAS leg was significantly decreased from 8.1 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 2.3 ± 0.7 postoperative day 2 (p < 0.001).Conclusion: The far-lateral transforaminal UBE lumbar discectomy would be a viable surgical option for upper lumbar disc herniations.

Da-In Jeong, R.N. and Young Eun, R.N., Ph.D.. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 2020;23:139-50. https://doi.org/10.14475/kjhpc.2020.23.3.139

This study aimed to verify the level of COVID-19 infection control practices and the factors affecting the COVID-19 infection control practices of Korean nurses based on the health belief model. The participants were 143 nurses experienced in caring for COVID-19 patients in South Korea. Questionnaires were used to measure health beliefs, confidence in practice, knowledge of COVID-19, infection protection environment, and COVID-19 infection control practices. Data were analyzed by performing descriptive statistics, an independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, the Mann–Whitney test and multiple regression analysis. The mean score for infection control practices related to COVID-19 was 4.76 on a 5-point scale where a higher score indicates superior infection control performance. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the factors that influenced COVID-19 infection control practices were gender, marital status, perceived susceptibility, and confidence in practice related to COVID-19. With COVID-19 approaching endemic and to prevent infectious diseases, it is necessary to emphasize perceived sensitivity by providing accurate information on the risk of infection rather than simply inducing infection control to be divided into individual activities. In addition, nurses’ infection control practices should be implemented with confidence with the nurses themselves feeling the need for infection control and not being forced by the social atmosphere or the hospital.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise in patients with hemophilia. Methods: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. A literature search was conducted of published randomized controlled trials for exercise interventions from January 1, 2014 to March 15, 2023. To estimate the size of the effects of exercise, a meta-analysis was performed using the R package “meta.” Results: Five databases were searched to obtain articles published in Korean or English. Of 1,150 articles reviewed, 13 were included in the systematic review and 9 in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Results: The overall effect sizes of exercise interventions, calculated as the standardized mean difference, were -0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.41 to –1.20) for pain, -2.13 (95% CI = -3.33 to -0.93) for joint health, 9.96 (95% CI = 7.51 to 12.28) for physical activity, and 0.59 (95% CI = -0.39 to -1.56) for quality of life. Conclusion: These findings suggest that exercise is useful for improving the joint health and physical activity of patients with hemophilia. Thus, it is necessary to develop and apply exercise interventions for patients with hemophilia to reduce their pain and improve their quality of life.