Joel B. Epstein

Prof. Joel B. Epstein


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 September 2012 in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJoel B. Epstein
Joel B. Epstein
Juliette THARIATJuliette THARIAT
Juliette THARIAT
RBRene‐Jean Bensadoun
Rene‐Jean Bensadoun
ABAndrei Barasch
Andrei Barasch
BMBarbara A. Murphy
Barbara A. Murphy
EMEllie Maghami
Ellie Maghami
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Oral complications resulting from cancer and cancer therapies cause acute and late toxicities that may be underreported, underrecognized, and undertreated. Recent advances in cancer treatment have led to changes in the incidence, nature, and severity of oral complications. As the number of survivors increases, it is becoming increasingly recognized that the aggressive management of oral toxicities is needed to ensure optimal long‐term oral health and general well‐being. Advances in care have had an impact on previously recognized oral complications and are leading to newly recognized adverse effects. Here, the authors briefly review advances in cancer therapy, including recent advances in surgery, oral care, radiation therapy, hematopoietic cell transplantation, and medical oncology; describe how these advances affect oral health; and discuss the frequent and/or severe oral health complications associated with cancer and cancer treatment and their effect upon long‐term health. Although some of the acute oral toxicities of cancer therapies may be reduced, they remain essentially unavoidable. The significant impact of long‐term complications requires increased awareness and recognition to promote prevention and appropriate intervention. It is therefore important for the primary oncologist to be aware of these complications so that appropriate measures can be implemented in a timely manner. Prevention and management is best provided via multidisciplinary health care teams, which must be integrated and communicate effectively in order to provide the best patient care in a coordinated manner at the appropriate time. CA Cancer J Clin 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

1 February 2010 in Oral Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJoel B. Epstein
Joel B. Epstein
ABAndrei Barasch
Andrei Barasch

14 July 2009 in Head & Neck Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJoel B. Epstein
Joel B. Epstein
DWDiana J Wilkie
Diana J Wilkie
DFDena J Fischer
Dena J Fischer
YKYoung-Ok Kim
Young-Ok Kim
DVDana Villines
Dana Villines
Background: Pain is common in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and may be attributed to the malignancy and/or cancer treatment. Pain mechanisms and patient report of pain in HNC are expected to include both nociceptive and neuropathic components. The purpose of this study was to assess the trajectory of orofacial and other pain during and following treatment, using patient reports of neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain and pain impact. Methods: 124 consecutive HNC patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) (95 men, 29 women; mean age: 54.7 ± 12.3 years) participated in a patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment. Patients completed the McGill Pain Questionnaire three times during therapy and 3 months following study entry. Results: The majority of patients related their pain to the tumor and/or cancer treatment. Whereas 59% reported their pain to be less severe than they expected, 29% were not satisfied with their level of pain despite pain management during cancer therapy. Worst pain was 3.0 ± 1.3 on a 0- to 5-point verbal descriptor scale. Pain intensity was present at entry, highest at 2-week follow-up, declining towards the end of treatment and persisting at 3-month follow-up. The most common neuropathic pain descriptors chosen were aching (20%) and burning (27%); nociceptive words chosen were dull (22%), sore (32%), tender (35%), and throbbing (23%), and affective/evaluative descriptors were tiring (25%) and annoying (41%). 57% of patients reported continuous pain, and combined continuous and intermittent pain was reported by 79% of patients. Discussion: This study provides evidence that patients with HNC experience nociceptive and neuropathic pain during RT despite ongoing pain management. The affective and evaluative descriptors chosen for head and neck pain indicate considerable impact on quality of life even with low to moderate levels of pain intensity. These findings suggest that clinicians should consider contemporary management for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain in head and neck cancer patients.

1 June 2008 in Oral Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJoel B. Epstein
Joel B. Epstein
SSS. Silverman
S. Silverman
JEJ.D. Epstein
J.D. Epstein
SLS.A. Lonky
S.A. Lonky
MBM.A. Bride
M.A. Bride

1 November 2004 in Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMeir Gorsky
Meir Gorsky
JEJoel B. Epstein
Joel B. Epstein
COCarol Oakley
Carol Oakley
NLNhu D. Le
Nhu D. Le
JHJohn Hay
John Hay
PSPeter Stevenson-Moore
Peter Stevenson-Moore

26 April 2012 in Head & Neck Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJed J Jacobson
Jed J Jacobson
JEJoel B. Epstein
Joel B. Epstein
FEFrederick C Eichmiller
Frederick C Eichmiller
TGTeresa B Gibson
Teresa B Gibson
GCGinger S Carls
Ginger S Carls
BMBarbara Murphy
Barbara Murphy
Head and neck cancers are of particular interest to health care providers, their patients, and those paying for health care services, because they have a high morbidity, they are extremely expensive to treat, and of the survivors only 48% return to work. Consequently the economic burden of oral cavity, oral pharyngeal, and salivary gland cancer (OC/OP/SG) must be understood. The cost of these cancers in the U.S. has not been investigated.