Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Moskva, Russia
Ms. Olga Aleksandrovna Vlasova
Research Institute of Carcinogenesis, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Moskva, Russia
Guanine-rich DNA sequences tending to adopt noncanonical G-quadruplex (G4) structures are over-represented in promoter regions of oncogenes. Ligands recognizing G4 were shown to stabilize these DNA structures and drive their formation regulating expression of corresponding genes. We studied the interaction of several plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) with G4s and their effects on gene expression in a cellular context. The binding of PSMs with G4s formed by the sequences of well-studied oncogene promoters and telomeric repeats was evaluated using a fluorescent indicator displacement assay. c-MYC G4 folding topology and thermal stability, as well as the PMS influence on these parameters, were demonstrated by UV-spectroscopy and circular dichroism. The effects of promising PSMs on c-MYC expression were assessed using luciferase reporter assay and qPR-PCR in cancer and immortalized cultured cells. The ability of PMS to multi-targeting cell signaling pathways was analyzed by the pathway-focused gene expression profiling with qRT-PCR. The multi-target activity of a number of PSMs was demonstrated by their interaction with a set of G4s mimicking those formed in the human genome. We have shown a direct G4-mediated down regulation of c-MYC expression by sanguinarine, quercetin, kaempferol, and thymoquinone; these effects being modulated by PSM’s indirect influence via cell signaling pathways.
Novel indolocarbazole derivatives named LCS were synthesized by our research group. Two of them were selected as the most active anticancer agents in vivo. We studied the mechanisms of anticancer activity in accordance with the previously described effects of indolocarbazoles. Cytotoxicity was estimated by MTT assay. We analyzed LCS-DNA interactions by circular dichroism in cholesteric liquid crystals and fluorescent indicator displacement assay. The effect on the activity of topoisomerases I and II was studied by DNA relaxation assay. Expression of interferon signaling target genes was estimated by RT-PCR. Chromatin remodeling was analyzed–the effect on histone H1 localization and reactivation of epigenetically silenced genes. LCS-induced change in the expression of a wide gene set was counted by means of PCR array. Our study revealed the cytotoxic activity of the compounds against 11 cancer cell lines and it was higher than in immortalized cells. Both compounds bind DNA; binding constants were estimated—LCS-1208 demonstrated higher affinity than LCS-1269; it was shown that LCS-1208 intercalates into DNA that is typical for rebeccamycin derivatives. LCS-1208 also inhibits topoisomerases I and IIα. Being a strong intercalator and topoisomerase inhibitor, LCS-1208 upregulates the expression of interferon-induced genes. In view of LCSs binding to DNA we analyzed their influence on chromatin stability and revealed that LCS-1269 displaces histone H1. Our analysis of chromatin remodeling also included a wide set of epigenetic experiments in which LCS-1269 demonstrated complex epigenetic activity. Finally, we revealed that the antitumor effect of the compounds is based not only on binding to DNA and chromatin remodeling but also on alternative mechanisms. Both compounds induce expression changes in genes involved in neoplastic transformation and target genes of the signaling pathways in cancer cells. Despite of being structurally similar, each compound has unique biological activities. The effects of LCS-1208 are associated with intercalation. The mechanisms of LCS-1269 include influence on higher levels such as chromatin remodeling and epigenetic effects.
Recently many new approaches for repurposing or repositioning of the clinically used drugs have been developed. Drug repurposing allows not only to use known schemes for the synthesis of biologically active compounds, but also to avoid multiple studies that are necessary for drug approval process – analysis of pharmacokinetics, carcinogenicity, acute and chronic toxicity, including cardiotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, allergenicity etc. It makes possible to reduce the number of experimental studies as well as costs of investigations. In cancer research drug repurposing includes screening for medicines used nowadays for the treatment of patients with non-cancer diseases which possess anticancer activity or able to enhance the effects of the standard anticancer chemotherapy, and search for new applications of known anticancer drugs for the treatment of different cancer types. Scientific rationale for the search of the compounds with potential anticancer properties among drugs with different applications is based on the multiple cross-talks of signaling pathways, which can inhibit cell proliferation. Modern advances in genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics, development of permanently improving databases of drug molecular effects and high throughput analytical systems allow researchers to analyze simultaneously a large bulk of existing drugs and specific molecular targets. This review describes the main approaches and resources currently used for the drug repurposing, as well as a number of examples.
Resveratrol, genistein and quercetin from the group of polyphenols from secondary plant metabolites reveal cancer preventive and antivirus effects realized via their pleiotropic influence on the different macromolecules in cells. These compounds can interact with DNA without the formation of covalent bonds. This process is usually followed by changes in spatial, physical-chemical and structural DNA characteristics that can result in disfunction of DNA metabolism enzymes and chromatin destabilization. Similar effects were described for anticancer drug Curaxine CBL0137 in association with activation of interferon-α signaling. We demonstrated dose-dependent stimulating effects of resveratrol, genistein and quercetin on interferon-α signaling using HeLa cells expressed mCherry protein with interferon-stimulated response elements (ISRE) in promoter. Furthermore, it was shown by live-cell fluorescent microscopy in HT1080 cells with mCherry-labeled histone H1.5 that described polyphenols induced the redistribution of this linker histone in cell nuclei. The data obtained suggest an existence of DNA-dependent mechanism of anticancer effects of plant polyphenols and a need for further study of crosslinks between the polyphenols’ influence on chromatin structure and the changes in genome function, in particular, induction of interferon- interferon-α signaling.
Background: Many plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) were shown to intercalate into DNA helix or interact with DNA grooves. This may influence histone-DNA interactions changeing chromatin structure and genome functioning. Methods: Nucleosome stability and linker histone H1.2, H1.4 and H1.5 localizations were studied in HeLa cells after the treatment with 15 PSMs, which are DNA-binders and possess anticancer activity according to published data. Chromatin remodeler CBL0137 was used as a control. Effects of PSMs were studied using fluorescent microscopy, flowcytometry, quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), western-blotting. Results: We showed that 1-hour treatment with CBL0137 strongly inhibited DNA synthesis and caused intensive linker histone depletion consistent with nucleosome destabilization. None of PSMs caused nucleosome destabilization, while most of them demonstrated significant influence on linker histone localizations. In particular, cell treatment with 11 PSMs at non-toxic concentrations induced significant translocation of the histone H1.5 to nucleoli and most of PSMs caused depletion of the histones H1.2 and H1.4 from chromatin fraction. Curcumin, resveratrol, berberine, naringenin, and quercetin caused significant redistribution of all three variants of the studied linker histones showing some overlap of PSM effects on linker histone DNA-binding. We demonstrated that PSMs, which induced the most significant redistribution of the histone H1.5 (berberine, curcumin and naringenin), influence the proportion of cells synthesizing DNA, expressing or non-expressing cyclin B and influence cell cycle distribution. Berberine induction of H1.5 translocations to nucleoli was shown to occur independently on the phases of cell cycle (metaphase was not analyzed). Conclusions: For the first time we revealed PSM influence on linker histone location in cell nuclei that opens a new direction of PSM research as anticancer agents.