To determine efficacy and safety of bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), in the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas. In this single-arm phase II trial, 32 patients were enrolled and they received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV infusion in 21-day cycles. Patients had disease that was deemed not surgically resectable, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤1, adequate organ function and had not received any radiation treatment in the last 28 days. Of the 30 patients evaluated for efficacy and toxic effect, four (two angiosarcoma and two epithelioid hemangioendothelioma; 17%) had a partial response. Fifteen patients (11 angiosarcoma and 4 epithelioid hemangioendothelioma; 50%) showed stable disease with a mean time to progression of 26 weeks. Bevacizumab was well tolerated with only one grade 4 adverse event. Expected known toxic effects of the drug were manageable. Bevacizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for metastatic or locally advanced angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas. Further phase III studies of bevacizumab in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents and/or radiation treatment are warranted.

PURPOSE: CMB305 is a heterologous prime-boost vaccination regimen created to prime NY-ESO-1–specific CD8 T-cell populations and then activate the immune response with a potent TLR-4 agonist. This open-label randomized phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adding the CMB305 regimen to atezolizumab (anti–programmed death ligand-1 therapy) in comparison with atezolizumab alone in patients with synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, relapsed, or metastatic synovial sarcoma or myxoid liposarcoma (any grade) were randomly assigned to receive CMB305 with atezolizumab (experimental arm) or atezolizumab alone (control arm). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety and immune responses were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were enrolled; 55.1% had received ≥ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Median PFS was 2.6 months and 1.6 months in the combination and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.3). Median OS was 18 months in both treatment arms. Patients treated with combination therapy had a significantly higher rate of treatment-induced NY-ESO-1–specific T cells ( P = .01) and NY-ESO-1–specific antibody responses ( P < .0001). In a post hoc analysis of all dosed patients, OS was longer (36 months) in the subset who developed anti-NY-ESO-1 T-cell immune response (hazard ratio, 0.3; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Although the combination of CMB305 and atezolizumab did not result in significant increases in PFS or OS compared with atezolizumab alone, some patients demonstrated evidence of an anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response and appeared to fare better by imaging than those without such an immune response. Combining prime-boost vaccines such as CMB305 with anti–programmed death ligand-1 therapies merits further evaluation in other clinical contexts.

Despite recent advances in radiotherapy and chemotherapy, survival rates for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have remained poor. The focus of SCCHN therapy has more recently shifted to the molecular level, particularly the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/ErbB) pathway. Several agents that target the EGFR pathway, including monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are under investigation for SCCHN. Searches of PubMed and results of key oncology congresses were performed to identify relevant articles and abstracts. The EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody cetuximab is approved for the treatment of locally advanced SCCHN in combination with radiotherapy, for first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic SCCHN in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and 5-fluorouracil, and for recurrent or metastatic SCCHN following progression with platinum-based chemotherapy. Other investigational EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies (e.g., panitumumab, nimotuzumab, zalutumumab) are in clinical development for SCCHN. Inhibition of the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR has also been explored as a therapeutic approach in SCCHN using small-molecule reversible inhibitors, such as gefitinib and erlotinib. However, a key challenge in SCCHN is the development of resistance, and strategies are being pursued to delay or overcome resistance to EGFR-targeted agents. These strategies include development of agents that inhibit multiple ErbB receptors simultaneously (e.g., lapatinib) or that bind multiple ErbB family receptors irreversibly (e.g., afatinib, PF-00299804) and investigation of combinations of agents that target multiple pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of SCCHN. Ongoing large clinical trials are evaluating these emerging agents and combinations for the treatment of SCCHN.

Purpose: FHD-609, a potent, selective, heterobifunctional degrader of bromodomain-containing protein 9 (BRD9), was evaluated for treating patients with advanced synovial sarcoma or SMARCB1-deficient tumors. Patients and Methods: In this multinational, open-label, phase I study (NCT04965753), patients received FHD-609 intravenously at escalating doses either twice weekly (5–80 mg; n = 40) or once weekly (40–120 mg; n = 15). Results: Fifty-five patients received FHD-609 for a median of 43 days. The maximum tolerated doses were 40 mg twice weekly and the equivalent weekly dose, 80 mg once weekly. Dose-limiting toxicities of QTc (heart rate–corrected QT interval) prolongation and syncope were observed at 40 and 60 mg twice weekly. Treatment-related adverse events were predominantly grades 1 to 2 in severity, most commonly dysgeusia (40%), dry mouth (29.1%), fatigue (27.3%), and anemia (25.5%). Eleven (20%) patients had treatment-emergent QTc (Fridericia formula) prolongation preceded by T-wave inversions; 21 (38.2%) patients had T-wave inversions without further cardiac events or ECG abnormalities. FHD-609 showed dose-dependent increases in pharmacokinetic exposure, with no substantial accumulation. Extensive BRD9 degradation in tumor tissue corresponded to the downregulation of cancer cell proliferation gene sets. One (2%) patient achieved a partial response; eight (15%) patients achieved stable disease, which lasted longer than 6 months in two patients. Conclusions: FHD-609 showed dose-dependent increases in systemic FHD-609 exposure and pharmacodynamic response profiles. The maximum tolerated doses were identified (40 mg twice weekly/80 mg once weekly) and preliminary clinical activity was observed. Future studies of BRD9 degraders will require strict cardiac monitoring given the QTc prolongation observed in this study.