Keigo Kobayashi

Dr. Keigo Kobayashi

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Central Singapore, Singapore
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 May 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SIShinnosuke Ikemura
Shinnosuke Ikemura
HYHiroyuki Yasuda
Hiroyuki Yasuda
SMShingo Matsumoto
Shingo Matsumoto
MKMayumi Kamada
Mayumi Kamada
JHJunko Hamamoto
Junko Hamamoto
KSKenzo Soejima
Kenzo Soejima
Significance: A variety of rare mutations account for 10–20% of EGFR mutations in nonsmall cell lung cancer. However, due to high diversity, proper medication for patients with such mutations is impossible in daily clinic. To appropriately treat lung cancer patients harboring such rare EGFR mutations, a robust prediction model to predict sensitivities of rare EGFR mutants to existing drugs is strongly needed. Using molecular dynamics simulation-based model, we successfully predicted diverse sensitivities of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants to existing inhibitors. The findings suggest the usefulness of in silico simulation to overcome mutation diversity at a clinically relevant level. The present in silico model will help in selecting effective drugs for these patients.

1 May 2018 in Clinical Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKeigo Kobayashi
Keigo Kobayashi
INIchiro Nakachi
Ichiro Nakachi
KNKatsuhiko Naoki
Katsuhiko Naoki
RSRyosuke Satomi
Ryosuke Satomi
MNMorio Nakamura
Morio Nakamura
TBTomoko Betsuyaku
Tomoko Betsuyaku

1 January 2019 in Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHanako Hasegawa
Hanako Hasegawa
HYHiroyuki Yasuda
Hiroyuki Yasuda
JHJunko Hamamoto
Junko Hamamoto
KMKeita Masuzawa
Keita Masuzawa
TTTetsuo Tani
Tetsuo Tani
KSKenzo Soejima
Kenzo Soejima

17 August 2018 in The Oncologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTakashi Sato
Takashi Sato
KSKenzo Soejima
Kenzo Soejima
DFDaisuke Fujisawa
Daisuke Fujisawa
MTMari Takeuchi
Mari Takeuchi
DADaisuke Arai
Daisuke Arai
TBTomoko Betsuyaku
Tomoko Betsuyaku
Background: Prognostic understanding in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers may have an impact on the delivery of effective care. The aims of this study were to explore prognostic understanding at diagnosis in both patients with advanced lung cancer and their caregivers and to investigate correlates of their understanding. Subjects, Materials, and Methods: A total of 193 patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their 167 caregivers were enrolled at 16 hospitals in Japan. We assessed their perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy and examined their associations with their sociodemographic characteristics, clinical status, quality of life, mood symptoms, and the status of disclosure of information by their treating physicians. Results: One fifth of patients and caregivers (21.7% and 17.6%, respectively) mistakenly believed that the patients’ cancer was “completely curable.” Substantial proportions of them (16.9% and 10.3%, respectively) mistakenly believed that the primary goal of therapy was to remove all the cancer. Levels of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers were significantly higher among those who had accurate understanding of prognosis. In multivariate analyses, inaccurate perceptions of prognosis in patients were associated with sex, better emotional well-being, and lower lung cancer-specific symptom burden. Caregivers’ inaccurate perceptions of patients’ prognoses were associated with better performance status and better emotional well-being of patients. Conclusion: Substantial proportions of advanced lung cancer patients and their caregivers misunderstood their prognosis. Interventions to improve their accurate prognostic understanding should be developed with careful attention paid to its associated factors. Implications for Practice: This study demonstrated that substantial proportions of patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their caregivers had misunderstandings about their prognosis. Accurate perceptions of prognosis, which are indispensable in the delivery of effective care, were associated with elevated levels of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers, warranting psychosocial care and support for them immediately after diagnosis. Inaccurate perceptions of prognosis in patients were associated with better emotional well-being and lower lung cancer-specific symptom burden. Illness understanding in caregivers was associated with patients’ physical and mental status. Those findings provide insight into how they obtain accurate illness understanding.

1 June 2018 in OncoTargets and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKeigo Kobayashi
Keigo Kobayashi
KNKatsuhiko Naoki
Katsuhiko Naoki
TMTadashi Manabe
Tadashi Manabe
KMKeita Masuzawa
Keita Masuzawa
HHHanako Hasegawa
Hanako Hasegawa
TBTomoko Betsuyaku
Tomoko Betsuyaku
Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exerts remarkable effects against EGFR T790M resistance mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Identifying T790M mutation by re-biopsy is essential before prescribing osimertinib. Tissue biopsy is the golden standard for this purpose, but several factors limit its success rate. The liquid biopsy with blood, using circulating tumor DNA, has been an alternative method. However, the true biological meaning and equivalence of liquid biopsy and tumor biopsy are still under investigation. Especially, the usefulness of serum samples to detect T790M mutation is not yet been known. Patients and methods: We prospectively evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and parallelism of the detection of EGFR mutations in tissue re-biopsy and liquid biopsy (plasma and serum), simultaneously, from June 2016 to May 2017. EGFR mutations in tumor re-biopsy were evaluated by COBAS ver2 and PNA-LNA PCR clamp method, and those in liquid biopsy were evaluated with COBAS ver2. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. In 10 patients whose EGFR mutation was detected in liquid biopsy, the original EGFR mutation (exon 19 del or L858R) was detected in all patients. Detection of EGFR mutation by COBAS ver2 and by PNA-LNA method was almost the same in tissue re-biopsy. The detection rate of T790M was lower than that of the original EGFR mutation in liquid biopsy compared to that in tissue re-biopsy. The detection of T790M in serum exhibited a higher specificity (67%) and positive predictive value (50%) than that in plasma (50% and 40%, respectively). The detection sensitivity was similar in plasma and serum. Conclusion: Plasma, serum, and tissue genotyping can have complementary roles for detecting EGFR-T790M using COBAS ver2. Repeated tests with different samples and different methods may improve accuracy of T790M detection and will lead to the maximum benefit for the patient.

1 February 2010 in Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TTT Tanaka
T Tanaka
KHK Hashimoto
K Hashimoto
KKKeigo Kobayashi
Keigo Kobayashi
HSHiroko Sugawara
Hiroko Sugawara
MAMasahiro Abo
Masahiro Abo
Background: The objective of this study was to test the predictive validity of a new scale, the Revi...