Sara Orecchia

Dr. Sara Orecchia


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJoanna Kopecka
Joanna Kopecka
Iris Chiara SalaroglioIris Chiara Salaroglio
Iris Chiara Salaroglio
LRLuisella Righi
Luisella Righi
RLRoberta Libener
Roberta Libener
SOSara Orecchia
Sara Orecchia
Chiara RigantiChiara Riganti
Chiara Riganti

11 January 2024 in Oncology and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pepe
Francesco Pepe
Gianluca RussoGianluca Russo
Gianluca Russo
AVAlessandro Venuta
Alessandro Venuta
CSClaudia Scimone
Claudia Scimone
MNMariantonia Nacchio
Mariantonia Nacchio
Giancarlo TronconeGiancarlo Troncone
Giancarlo Troncone
Introduction Biomarker testing is mandatory for the clinical management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Myriads of technical platforms are now available for biomarker analysis with differences in terms of multiplexing capability, analytical sensitivity, and turnaround time (TAT). We evaluated the technical performance of the diagnostic workflows of 24 representative Italian institutions performing molecular tests on a series of artificial reference specimens built to mimic routine diagnostic samples. Methods Sample sets of eight slides from cell blocks of artificial reference specimens harboring exon 19 EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) p.E746_AT50del, exon 2 KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) p.G12C, ROS1 (c-ros oncogene 1)-unknown gene fusion, and MET (MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) Δ exon 14 skipping were distributed to each participating institution. Two independent cell block specimens were validated by the University of Naples Federico II before shipment. Methodological and molecular data from reference specimens were annotated. Results Overall, a median DNA concentration of 3.3 ng/µL (range 0.1–10.0 ng/µL) and 13.4 ng/µL (range 2.0–45.8 ng/µL) were obtained with automated and manual technical procedures, respectively. RNA concentrations of 5.7 ng/µL (range 0.2–11.9 ng/µL) and 9.3 ng/µL (range 0.5–18.0 ng/µL) were also detected. KRAS exon 2 p.G12C, EGFR exon 19 p.E736_A750del hotspot mutations, and ROS1 aberrant transcripts were identified in all tested cases, whereas 15 out of 16 (93.7%) centers detected MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Conclusions Optimized technical workflows are crucial in the decision-making strategy of patients with NSCLC. Artificial reference specimens enable optimization of diagnostic workflows for predictive molecular analysis in routine clinical practice.

25 July 2020 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIgor Monsellato
Igor Monsellato
EGElisabetta Garibaldi
Elisabetta Garibaldi
ECElisa Cassinotti
Elisa Cassinotti
LBLudovica Baldari
Ludovica Baldari
LBLuigi Boni
Luigi Boni
SOSara Orecchia
Sara Orecchia
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the mainstay treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, leading to significant decrease in tumor size (downsizing) and a shift towards earlier disease stage (downstaging). Extensive histopathological work-up of the tumor specimen after surgery including tumor regression grading and lymph node status helped to visualize individual tumor sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy, retrospectively. As the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is heterogeneous, however, valid biomarkers are needed to monitor tumor response. A relevant number of studies aimed to identify molecular markers retrieved from tumor tissue while the relevance of blood-based biomarkers is less stringent assessed. MicroRNAs are currently under investigation to serve as blood-based biomarkers. To date, no screening approach to identify relevant miRNAs as biomarkers in blood of patients with rectal cancer was undertaken. The aim of the study is to investigate the role of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers in those patients included in the TiMiSNAR Trial (NCT 03465982). This is a biomolecular substudy of TiMiSNAR Trial (NCT03962088). Methods: All included patients in the TiMiSNAR Trial are supposed to undergo blood collection at the time of diagnosis, after neoadjuvant treatment, after 1 month from surgery, and after adjuvant chemotherapy whenever indicated. Discussion: TiMiSNAR-MIRNA will evaluate the association of variation between preneoadjuvant and postneoadjuvant expression levels of miRNA with pathological complete response. Moreover, the study will evaluate the role of liquid biopsies in the monitoring of treatment, correlate changes in expression levels of miRNA following complete surgical resection with disease-free survival, and evaluate the relation between changes in miRNA during surveillance and tumor relapse. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03962088. Registered on 23 May 2019.

6 December 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LCLuigi Cerbone
Luigi Cerbone
SOSara Orecchia
Sara Orecchia
PBPietro Bertino
Pietro Bertino
SDSara Delfanti
Sara Delfanti
AAAntonina Maria de Angelis
Antonina Maria de Angelis
Federica GrossoFederica Grosso
Federica Grosso
Mesothelioma comprises a group of rare cancers arising from the mesothelium of the pleura, peritoneum, tunica vaginalis testis and pericardium. Mesothelioma is generally associated with asbestos exposure and has a dismal prognosis, with few therapeutic options. Several next generation sequencing (NGS) experiments have been performed on mesothelioma arising at different sites. These studies highlight a genomic landscape mainly characterized by a high prevalence (>20%) of genomic aberrations leading to functional losses in oncosuppressor genes such as BAP1, CDKN2A, NF2, SETD2 and TP53. Nevertheless, to date, evidence of the effect of targeting these alterations with specific drugs is lacking. Conversely, 1–2% of mesothelioma might harbor activating mutations in oncogenes with specifically approved drugs. The goal of this review is to summarize NGS applications in mesothelioma and to provide insights into target therapy of mesothelioma guided by NGS.