David A. Jett

Dr. David A. Jett

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-9527, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2022 in Neuron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAmir P. Tamiz
Amir P. Tamiz
WKWalter J. Koroshetz
Walter J. Koroshetz
NDNeel T. Dhruv
Neel T. Dhruv
David A. JettDavid A. Jett
David A. Jett

1 January 2020 in Neurobiology of Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
David A. JettDavid A. Jett
David A. Jett
SSShardell M. Spriggs
Shardell M. Spriggs
This special issue will describe cutting-edge translational research on the development of safe and effective therapeutics for treating exposure to toxic chemical threat agents that target the nervous system. These studies are supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Countermeasures Against Chemical Threats (CounterACT) program. Chemical threats include chemical warfare agents, pesticides and other toxic chemicals whose primary mode of action is targeted within the nervous system. Depending on the dose, the effects of these toxic chemicals can be lethal or cause serious morbidity including neuropathology and neurological deficits. Current topics in research on organophosphorus pesticides and chemical warfare agents include developing alternatives to currently approve acetylcholinesterase reactivators, control of seizures that are refractory to benzodiazepine drugs, and treatments for serious morbidity caused by non-lethal exposures. There is also an effort to understand the mechanisms of toxicity and treatments for other neuro-active agents such as tetramine and hydrogen sulfide. A robust translational research effort on nerve agents is essential for being better prepared with an effective medical response capability during chemical emergencies.

1 December 2014 in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CWChristina M. Wilhelm
Christina M. Wilhelm
TSThomas H. Snider
Thomas H. Snider
MBMichael C. Babin
Michael C. Babin
David A. JettDavid A. Jett
David A. Jett
GPGennady E. Platoff
Gennady E. Platoff
DYDavid T. Yeung
David T. Yeung
The currently fielded pre-hospital therapeutic regimen for the treatment of organophosphorus (OP) poisoning in the United States (U.S.) is the administration of atropine in combination with an oxime antidote (2-PAM Cl) to reactivate inhibited acetylcholinesterase (AChE). Depending on clinical symptoms, an anticonvulsant, e.g., diazepam, may also be administered. Unfortunately, 2-PAM Cl does not offer sufficient protection across the range of OP threat agents, and there is some question as to whether it is the most effective oxime compound available. The objective of the present study is to identify an oxime antidote, under standardized and comparable conditions, that offers protection at the FDA approved human equivalent dose (HED) of 2-PAM Cl against tabun (GA), sarin (GB), soman (GD), cyclosarin (GF), and VX, and the pesticides paraoxon, chlorpyrifos oxon, and phorate oxon. Male Hartley guinea pigs were subcutaneously challenged with a lethal level of OP and treated at approximately 1 min post challenge with atropine followed by equimolar oxime therapy (2-PAM Cl, HI-6 DMS, obidoxime Cl₂, TMB-4, MMB4-DMS, HLö-7 DMS, MINA, and RS194B) or therapeutic-index (TI) level therapy (HI-6 DMS, MMB4-DMS, MINA, and RS194B). Clinical signs of toxicity were observed for 24 h post challenge and blood cholinesterase [AChE and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE)] activity was analyzed utilizing a modified Ellman's method. When the oxime is standardized against the HED of 2-PAM Cl for guinea pigs, the evidence from clinical observations, lethality, quality of life (QOL) scores, and cholinesterase reactivation rates across all OPs indicated that MMB4 DMS and HLö-7 DMS were the two most consistently efficacious oximes.

1 December 2012 in NeuroToxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David A. JettDavid A. Jett
David A. Jett

1 July 2010 in Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David A. JettDavid A. Jett
David A. Jett
DYDavid T. Yeung
David T. Yeung
The National Institutes of Health has developed a comprehensive research program that includes research centers of excellence, individual research projects, small business projects, contracts, and interagency agreements to conduct basic, translational, and clinical research aimed at the discovery and/or identification of better medical countermeasures against chemical threat agents. Chemical threats include chemical warfare agents, toxic industrial and agricultural chemicals, and toxins and other chemicals that could be used intentionally as an act of terror or by large-scale accidents or natural disasters. The overarching goal of this research program is to enhance our medical response capabilities during an emergency. The program is named Countermeasures Against Chemical Threats (CounterACT). It supports translational research, applying ideas, insights, and discoveries generated through basic scientific inquiry to the treatment or prevention of mortality and morbidity caused by chemical threat agents. The categories of research supported under this program include creation and development of screening assays and animal models for therapy development, identification of candidate therapeutics, obtaining preliminary proof-of-principle data on the efficacy of candidate therapeutics, advanced efficacy and preclinical safety studies with appropriate animal models using Good Laboratory Practices (GLP), and clinical studies, including clinical trials with new drugs. Special consideration is given to research relevant to people who are particularly vulnerable, including the young, the elderly, and individuals with pre-existing medical conditions.

5 August 2020 in Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David A. JettDavid A. Jett
David A. Jett
CSChristopher A. Sibrizzi
Christopher A. Sibrizzi
RBRobyn B. Blain
Robyn B. Blain
PHPamela A. Hartman
Pamela A. Hartman
PLPamela J. Lein
Pamela J. Lein
ARAndrew A. Rooney
Andrew A. Rooney
Sarin is a highly toxic nerve agent that was developed for chemical warfare during World War II and is used in present conflicts. Immediate effects of acute sarin exposure are established; however, whether effects persist after initial signs have subsided is debated. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a systematic review to evaluate the evidence for long-term neurological effects following acute (<24 hour) exposure to sarin. The literature search and screening process identified 32 data sets within the 34 human studies and 47 data sets within the 51 animal studies (from 6837 potentially relevant references) that met the objective and the inclusion criteria. Four main health effect categories of neurological response were identified as having sufficient data to reach hazard conclusions: (1) cholinesterase levels; (2) visual and ocular effects; (3) effects on learning, memory, and intelligence; and (4) morphology and histopathology in nervous system tissues. NTP concluded that acute sarin exposure is known to be a neurological hazard to humans in the period following exposure up to 7 days and suspected to be a hazard week to years after exposure, given a lower level of evidence in later time periods. Effects included reduced cholinesterase, visual and ocular effects, impaired learning and memory, and altered nervous system morphology. Further mechanistic, targeted animal studies, translational research, and rapid research responses after human exposures may reduce uncertainties on long-term consequences of sarin.