For decades, the diagnosis, prognosis and thus, the treatment of acute myeloblastic leukemias and myelodysplastic neoplasms has been mainly based on morphological aspects, as evidenced by the French-American-British classification. The morphological aspects correspond quite well, in a certain number of particular cases, to particular evolutionary properties, such as acute myelomonoblastic leukemias with eosinophils or acute promyelocytic leukemias. Advances in biology, particularly “classical” cytogenetics (karyotype) and molecular cytogenetics (in situ hybridization), have made it possible to associate certain morphological features with particular molecular abnormalities, such as the pericentric inversion of chromosome 16 and translocation t(15;17) in the two preceding examples. Polymerase chain reaction techniques have made it possible to go further in these analyses by associating these karyotype abnormalities with their molecular causes, CBFbeta fusion with MYH11 and PML-RAR fusion in the previous cases. In these two examples, the molecular abnormality allows us to better define the pathophysiology of leukemia, to adapt certain treatments (all-transretinoic acid, for example), and to follow up the residual disease of strong prognostic value beyond the simple threshold of less than 5% of marrow blasts, signaling the complete remission. However, the new sequencing techniques of the next generation open up broader perspectives by being able to analyze several dozens of molecular abnormalities, improving all levels of management, from diagnosis to prognosis and treatment, even if it means that morphological aspects are increasingly relegated to the background.

Decades ago, the treatment for acute myeloid leukemia relied on cytarabine and anthracycline. However, advancements in medical research have introduced targeted therapies, initially employing monoclonal antibodies such as ant-CD52 and anti-CD123, and subsequently utilizing specific inhibitors that target molecular mutations like anti-IDH1, IDH2, or FLT3. The challenge lies in determining the role of these therapeutic options, considering the inherent tumor heterogeneity associated with leukemia diagnosis and the clonal drift that this type of tumor can undergo. Targeted drugs necessitate an examination of various therapeutic targets at the individual cell level rather than assessing the entire population. It is crucial to differentiate between the prognostic value and therapeutic potential of a specific molecular target, depending on whether it is found in a terminally differentiated cell with limited proliferative potential or a stem cell with robust capabilities for both proliferation and self-renewal. However, this cell-by-cell analysis is accompanied by several challenges. Firstly, the scientific aspect poses difficulties in comparing different single cell analysis experiments despite efforts to standardize the results through various techniques. Secondly, there are practical obstacles as each individual cell experiment incurs significant financial costs and consumes a substantial amount of time. A viable solution lies in the ability to process multiple samples simultaneously, which is a distinctive feature of the cell hashing technique. In this study, we demonstrate the applicability of the cell hashing technique for analyzing acute myeloid leukemia cells. By comparing it to standard single cell analysis, we establish a strong correlation in various parameters such as quality control, gene expression, and the analysis of leukemic blast markers in patients. Consequently, this technique holds the potential to become an integral part of the biological assessment of acute myeloid leukemia, contributing to the personalized and optimized management of the disease, particularly in the context of employing targeted therapies.

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) it is important to elucidate the biological events that lead from remission to relapse, which have a high probability of leading to an adverse disease outcome. The cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1A1) is underexpressed in AML cells when compared to healthy cells, both at the RNA level and at the protein level, and at least in the former, both in the bone marrow and in peripheral blood. Nonetheless, ALDH1A1/ALDH1A2 activity increases in AML cells during disease relapse and is higher in adverse prognosis AML in comparison with favorable prognosis AML. Furthermore, especially in relapsed AML and in unfavorable AML, AML cells rich in ALDH1A1 can contain high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), in parallel with high ALDH1A1/2 activity. This metabolic feature is clearly incompatible with normal stem cells. The term “stem-like” therefore is useful to coin malignant cells with a variety of genetic makeups, metabolic programming and biomarkers that converge in the function of survival of clones sufficient to sustain, spread and re-establish neoplastic disease. Therefore, AML “stem-like” cells survive cancer treatment that eradicates other malignant cell clones. This fact differentiates AML “stem-like” cells from normal stem and progenitor cells that function in tissue regeneration as part of a distinct hierarchical order of cell phenotypes. The ODYSSEY clinical trial is a Phase I/II study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ABD-3001, a novel therapeutic agent, in patients with AML who have relapsed or are refractory to standard treatments. In this context, ABD-3001 is used as an inhibitor of cytosolic ALDH1 enzymes, such as ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2.

Introduction: The application of single-cell RNA sequencing has greatly improved our understanding of various cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in physiological and pathophysiological processes. However, obtaining living cells for this technique can be difficult under certain conditions. To solve this problem, the methanol fixation method appeared as a promising alternative for routine clinical use. Materials and Methods: In this study, we selected two AML samples that had been fixed in methanol for 12–18 months. Once the cells were rehydrated, these samples were subjected to single-cell RNA sequencing. We then compared the results obtained from these samples with those obtained from the same samples cryopreserved in DMSO. Results: We used a previously validated methanol fixation protocol to perform scRNA-seq on DMSO cryopreserved cells and cells fixed in methanol for more than one year. Preliminary results show that methanol fixation induces some genetic and transcriptional modification compared with DMSO cryopreservation but remains a valuable method for single-cell analysis of primary human leukemia cells. Conclusions: The initial findings from this study highlight certain resemblances in methanol fixation over a 12-month period and cryopreservation with DMSO, along with associated transcriptional level modifications. However, we observed genetic degradation in the fixation condition when extending beyond one year. Despite certain study limitations, it is evident that short-term methanol fixation can be effectively used for leukemia blast samples. Its ease of implementation holds the potential to simplify the integration of this technique into routine clinical practice.