Lime was an enduring and versatile material in ancient China, widely applied in medicine, dyeing, shipbuilding, and notably in architecture as a binding agent for masonry, earthen structures, and decorative finishes. Its recognition as Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) stems from both its profound historical significance and its capacity to meet UNESCO’s five criteria for ICH: sustaining cultural identity, embodying systematic knowledge, ensuring community continuity, stimulating creativity, and addressing contemporary challenges. This study employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating historical, archeological, and anthropological research with experimental and scientific analysis, to establish a comprehensive knowledge framework. This framework is structured around six technical stages: material selection, calcination, slaking, formulation, construction, and curing. By reconstructing the embodied knowledge and socio-technical practices of artisans, we reconceptualize lime craftsmanship as a living, active, and productive form of ICH. This research offers valuable theoretical and practical insights for architectural heritage conservation and the promotion of sustainable cultural development.

Building vertical greenery has become an effective measure to solve the contradiction between the shortage of urban greenery and the increasing demand for greenery. However, the lack of direct economic benefits dampens motivation for its development. As a vital development mode for high-density cities worldwide, commercial complexes are the most appropriate buildings to support greenery because of economic agglomeration and resource integration. An important reason for whether or not commercial complex greenery is constructed is the need for an evaluation system. To bridge this research gap, we propose a holistic evaluation guideline for commercial complex greenery. First, a list of related sustainable rating systems from the academic literature and official websites was compiled and reviewed to identify and compare their referential features. Second, the limitations of these evaluation systems in assessing the greenery of commercial complexes were explored using a case study. Third, the features of commercial complex greenery were introduced through field research and interviews. Finally, a holistic evaluation guideline for vertical greenery systems in commercial complexes was proposed, including logical thinking for the evaluation system of the dimension–indicator–quantitative method, the creation of innovative evaluation indicators, the establishment of a database, the assignment of weights to different dimensions and indicators, and the construction of an evaluation mechanism for the whole life cycle. This research demonstrates the significance of an evaluation process for commercial complex greenery systems, proposes a refined guideline for its development, and rationally grasps the development direction from a macro perspective.

As a dominant typology of urban development and a critical component of public infrastructure, super high-rise buildings have transitioned from a speed-driven expansion model to one that emphasizes a balanced approach between development pace and quality. Within the context of urban stock renewal, numerous super high-rise buildings now face pressing needs for retrofitting to enhance their sustainability and urban integration. This study establishes “urbanity”—defined as the capacity of the built environment to foster vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable urban life—as a core evaluation criterion for assessing the retrofitting and renewal of super high-rise buildings. Based on a comprehensive literature review and field investigations, 21 representative indicators were identified, and the key factors influencing the upgrading of such buildings were determined. Subsequently, 20 super high-rise buildings in Shanghai were selected as case studies, and their urbanity performance was assessed using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model (FCEM). The findings reveal common challenges, including architectural homogenization, functional singularity, limited vitality in near-ground spaces, weak integration with surrounding infrastructure, and inefficient utilization of urban landscape resources. Furthermore, the study analyzes urbanity-oriented enhancement strategies implemented in the selected cases and proposes targeted improvement measures across five key dimensions: building morphology, functional configuration, near-ground space, infrastructure, and urban landscape. The research contributes to the body of knowledge on sustainable urban regeneration by providing a practical evaluation framework and actionable strategies for retrofitting super high-rise buildings. The findings aim to support more livable, inclusive, and resilient urban environments, with implications for both Chinese and global cities facing similar challenges in high-density urban contexts.