Background: The aim of this randomized clinical trial follow-up at three months was to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention with a focus on diet and physical activity (PA) to change the amount of PA, body mass index (BMI) and the waist circumference (WC) in patients with severe mental illness.Methods: We recruited 332 outpatients with severe mental disorders undergoing treatment with antipsychotic medication from Mental Healthcare Centers of Barcelona. They were randomly assigned to an intervention or a control group. The patients in the intervention group participated in a group PA and diet educational program. The blinded measurements at 0 and 3 months were: the level of PA (IPAQ questionnaire), BMI, WC, blood pressure, dietary habits (PREDIMED questionnaire), quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire) and laboratory parameters (cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose).Results: The average age was 46.7 years and 55% were males. Schizophrenia had been diagnosed in 67.1% of them. At 3 months, the average weekly walking METs rose significantly in the IG 266.05 METs (95%CI: 16.86 to 515.25; P = 0.036). The total MET average also rose although not significantly: 191.38 METs (95%CI: 1.38 to 381.38; P = 0.086). However, the BMI decreased significantly more in the CG, by 0.26 kg/m² (95%CI: 0.02 to 0.51; P = 0.038), than in the IG. There were no significant differences in the WC.Conclusions: The short-term results suggest that the intervention increases the level of PA, but does not improve physical or laboratory parameters.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01729650 (effectiveness of a physical activity and diet program in patients with psychotic disorder [CAPiCOR]).

The association between physical illness and depression implies a poorer management of chronic disease and a lower response to antidepressant treatments. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of a psychoeducational group intervention led by Primary Care (PC) nurses, aimed at patients of this kind. It is a randomized, multicenter clinical trial with intervention (IG) and control groups (CG), blind response variables, and a one year follow-up. The study included 380 patients ≥50 years of age from 18 PC teams. The participants presented depression (BDI-II > 12) and a physical comorbidity: diabetes mellitus type 2, ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and/or asthma. The IG (n = 204) received the psychoeducational intervention (12 weekly sessions of 90 min), and the CG (n = 176) had standard care. The patients were evaluated at baseline, and at 4 and 12 months. The main outcome measures were clinical remission of depressive symptoms (BDI-II ≤ 13) and therapeutic response (reduction of depressive symptoms by 50%). Remission was not significant at four months. At 12 months it was 53.9% in the IG and 41.5% in the CG. (OR = 0.61, 95% CI, 0.49–0.76). At 4 months the response in the IG (OR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.44–0.78) was significant, but not at 12 months. The psychoeducational group intervention led by PC nurses for individuals with depression and physical comorbidity has been shown to be effective for remission at long-term and for therapeutic response at short-term.

Depressive disorders are the third leading cause of consultation in primary care, mainly in patients with chronic physical illnesses. Studies have shown the effectiveness of group psychoeducation in reducing symptoms in depressive individuals. Our primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention based on a psychoeducational program, carried out by primary care nurses, to improve the remission/response rate of depression in patients with chronic physical illness. Secondarily, to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, its impact on improving control of the physical pathology and quality of life, and intervention feasibility. A multicenter, randomized, clinical trial, with two groups and one-year follow-up evaluation. Economic evaluation study. We will assess 504 patients (252 in each group) aged > 50 years assigned to 25 primary healthcare centers (PHC) from Catalonia (urban, semi-urban, and rural). Participants suffer from major depression (Beck depression inventory: BDI-II 13–28) and at least one of the following: type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and/or ischemic cardiopathy. Patients with moderate/severe suicide risk or severe mental disorders are excluded. Participants will be distributed randomly into the intervention group (IG) and control (CG). The IG will participate in the psychoeducational intervention: 12 sessions of 90 min, once a week led by two Primary Care (PC) nurses. The sessions will consist of health education regarding chronic physical illness and depressive symptoms. Clinical remission of depression and/or response to intervention (BDI-II). Improvement in control of chronic diseases (blood test and physical parameters), drug compliance (Morinsky-Green test and number of containers returned), quality of life (EQ-5D), medical service utilization (appointments and hospital admissions due to complications), and feasibility of the intervention (satisfaction and compliance). Evaluations will be blinded, and conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and 12 months follow-up. Results could be informative for efforts to prevent depression in patients with a chronic physical illness. NCT03243799 (registration date August 9, 2017)

Identificar las variables relacionadas con el hecho de recibir servicios sociales de carácter público o privado antes de la implantación de la Ley de Dependencia en pacientes recluidos en sus domicilios. estudio descriptivo transversal. 72 equipos de atención primaria de Cataluña (EAP). pacientes mayores de 64 años, no institucionalizados atendidos por un programa de atención domiciliaria de los EAP. de cada paciente se registraron: comorbilidad, estado funcional, estado cognitivo, si tenía úlceras por presión, salud subjetiva, valoración social, utilización de servicios sociales y sanitarios formales e informales, sobrecarga del cuidador, ingresos en residencias, hospitales o urgencias, además del número de visitas de profesionales santiarios. participan 1.068 pacientes, el 46,8% recibe algún servicio social. Las variables relacionadas con la prestación de servicios sociales son: el grado de dependencia (Barthel), las úlceras por presión y recibir rehabilitación a domicilio. El test de Barthel está firmemente asociado a la problemática social (Gijón), carecer de cuidador informal, más de dos visitas de médico de familia y tener sanidad privada adicional. para ser más equitativa, la valoración de las prestaciones de la Ley de Dependencia debería considerar también el estado de salud. Antes de la aplicación de esta ley se intuye una dificultad de acceso a los servicios sociales formales para las clases medias que no acceden a las prestaciones públicas ni pueden pagarlas. Las prestaciones sociales son todavía una alternativa a la atención familiar. To identify which social and health variables are associated with receiving social services in patients included in home care programmes with the implementation of the Dependence Law. Cross-sectional study. 72 primary health care teams in Catalonia. Patients over 64 years old with chronic diseases in home care programmes in Catalonia. Health status variables: Charlson, Barthel, Pfeiffer, Braden and Gijon, data from their carer (Zarit), self perception of health (SF-12), health professional visits, as well as: emergency visits, temporary admissions, and final results such as death or definitive admission in a nursing home or a hospital. A total of 1068 patients were included, 46.8% of the patients received some kind of social service, public or private. We observed that the variables related to receive some kind of social services are: high dependence (Barthel test), pressure sores and home care rehabilitation. Barthel test is highly associated with having social problems (Gijon test), living without an informal carer, more than 2 GP visits and having additional private health care. To be more fair, the evaluation of the provisions of the Dependence Law should also consider the health status of the patient. With the implementation of this law we can observe difficulties in access to social services for middle class patients. These patients do not have access to public social assistance and cannot pay for a private one. Social services are still an alternative to family care.