Ricardo Guerrero

Prof. Dr. Ricardo Guerrero

University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

49Years (1978-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in Microbial Cell Factories
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mercedes BerlangaMercedes Berlanga
Mercedes Berlanga
Ricardo GuerreroRicardo Guerrero
Ricardo Guerrero
In nature, bacteria alternate between two modes of growth: a unicellular life phase, in which the cells are free-swimming (planktonic), and a multicellular life phase, in which the cells are sessile and live in a biofilm, that can be defined as surface-associated microbial heterogeneous structures comprising different populations of microorganisms surrounded by a self-produced matrix that allows their attachment to inert or organic surfaces. While a unicellular life phase allows for bacterial dispersion and the colonization of new environments, biofilms allow sessile cells to live in a coordinated, more permanent manner that favors their proliferation. In this alternating cycle, bacteria accomplish two physiological transitions via differential gene expression: (i) from planktonic cells to sessile cells within a biofilm, and (ii) from sessile to detached, newly planktonic cells. Many of the innate characteristics of biofilm bacteria are of biotechnological interest, such as the synthesis of valuable compounds (e.g., surfactants, ethanol) and the enhancement/processing of certain foods (e.g., table olives). Understanding the ecology of biofilm formation will allow the design of systems that will facilitate making products of interest and improve their yields.

20 June 2000 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLynn Margulis
Lynn Margulis
MDMichael F. Dolan
Michael F. Dolan
Ricardo GuerreroRicardo Guerrero
Ricardo Guerrero
We present a testable model for the origin of the nucleus, the membrane-bounded organelle that defines eukaryotes. A chimeric cell evolved via symbiogenesis by syntrophic merger between an archaebacterium and a eubacterium. The archaebacterium, a thermoacidophil resembling extant Thermoplasma , generated hydrogen sulfide to protect the eubacterium, a heterotrophic swimmer comparable to Spirochaeta or Hollandina that oxidized sulfide to sulfur. Selection pressure for speed swimming and oxygen avoidance led to an ancient analogue of the extant cosmopolitan bacterial consortium “Thiodendron latens.” By eubacterial-archaebacterial genetic integration, the chimera, an amitochondriate heterotroph, evolved. This “earliest branching protist” that formed by permanent DNA recombination generated the nucleus as a component of the karyomastigont, an intracellular complex that assured genetic continuity of the former symbionts. The karyomastigont organellar system, common in extant amitochondriate protists as well as in presumed mitochondriate ancestors, minimally consists of a single nucleus, a single kinetosome and their protein connector. As predecessor of standard mitosis, the karyomastigont preceded free (unattached) nuclei. The nucleus evolved in karyomastigont ancestors by detachment at least five times (archamoebae, calonymphids, chlorophyte green algae, ciliates, foraminifera). This specific model of syntrophic chimeric fusion can be proved by sequence comparison of functional domains of motility proteins isolated from candidate taxa.

1 April 1986 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ricardo GuerreroRicardo Guerrero
Ricardo Guerrero
CACarlos Pedrós Alió
Carlos Pedrós Alió
IEIsabel Esteve
Isabel Esteve
JMJordi Mas
Jordi Mas
DCDavid Chase
David Chase
LMLynn Margulis
Lynn Margulis
Two kinds of predatory bacteria have been observed and characterized by light and electron microscopy in samples from freshwater sulfurous lakes in northeastern Spain. The first bacterium, named Vampirococcus , is Gram-negative and ovoidal (0.6 μm wide). An anaerobic epibiont, it adheres to the surface of phototrophic bacteria ( Chromatium spp.) by specific attachment structures and, as it grows and divides by fission, destroys its prey. An important in situ predatory role can be inferred for Vampirococcus from direct counts in natural samples. The second bacterium, named Daptobacter , is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic straight rod (0.5 × 1.5 μm) with a single polar flagellum, which collides, penetrates, and grows inside the cytoplasm of its prey (several genera of Chromatiaceae). Considering also the well-known case of Bdellovibrio , a Gram-negative, aerobic curved rod that penetrates and divides in the periplasmic space of many chemotrophic Gram-negative bacteria, there are three types of predatory prokaryotes presently known (epibiotic, cytoplasmic, and periplasmic). Thus, we conclude that antagonistic relationships such as primary consumption, predation, and scavenging had already evolved in microbial ecosystems prior to the appearance of eukaryotes. Furthermore, because they represent methods by which prokaryotes can penetrate other prokaryotes in the absence of phagocytosis, these associations can be considered preadaptations for the origin of intracellular organelles.

29 August 2006 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLynn Margulis
Lynn Margulis
MCMichael Chapman
Michael Chapman
Ricardo GuerreroRicardo Guerrero
Ricardo Guerrero
JHJohn Hall
John Hall
We develop a symbiogenetic concept of the origin of eukaryotic intracellular motility systems from anaerobic but aerotolerant spirochetes in sulfide-rich environments. The last eukaryotic common ancestors (LECAs) have extant archaeprotist descendants: motile nucleated cells with Embden-Meyerhof glycolysis and substrate-level phosphorylation that lack the α-proteobacterial symbiont that became the mitochondrion. Swimming and regulated O 2 -tolerance via sulfide oxidation already had been acquired by sulfidogenic wall-less archaebacteria (thermoplasmas) after aerotolerant cytoplasmic-tubule-containing spirochetes (eubacteria) attached to them. Increasing stability of sulfide-oxidizing/sulfur-reducing consortia analogous to extant sulfur syntrophies ( Thiodendron ) led to fusion. The eubacteria–archaebacteria symbiosis became permanent as the nucleus evolved by prokaryotic recombination with membrane hypertrophy, analogous to Gemmata obscuriglobus and other δ-proteobacteria with membrane-bounded nucleoids. Histone-coated DNA, protein-synthetic RNAs, amino-acylating, and other enzymes were contributed by the sulfidogen whereas most intracellular motility derives from the spirochete. From this redox syntrophy in anoxic and microoxic Proterozoic habitats LECA evolved. The nucleus originated by recombination of eu- and archaebacterial DNA that remained attached to eubacterial motility structures and became the microtubular cytoskeleton, including the mitotic apparatus. Direct LECA descendants include free-living archaeprotists in anoxic environments: archamoebae, metamonads, parabasalids, and some mammalian symbionts with mitosomes. LECA later acquired the fully aerobic Krebs cycle-oxidative phosphorylation-mitochondrial metabolism by integration of the protomitochondrion, a third α-proteobacterial symbiont from which the ancestors to most protoctists, all fungi, plants, and animals evolved. Secondarily anaerobic eukaryotes descended from LECA after integration of this oxygen-respiring eubacterium. Explanatory power and experimental predictions for molecular biology of the LECA concept are stated.

1 September 1985 in Limnology and Oceanography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ricardo GuerreroRicardo Guerrero
Ricardo Guerrero
EMEmilio Montesinos
Emilio Montesinos
CACarlos Pedrós Alió
Carlos Pedrós Alió
IEI. Esteve
I. Esteve
JMJordi Mas
Jordi Mas
JBJ. F. Bakker
J. F. Bakker
The anaerobic zones of Lakes Cisó and Vilar (Banyoles karstic area, NE Spain) had mass developments of purple sulfur bacteria during summer 1982. In Lake Vilar, Chromatium spp. was dominant (up to 92% of the microbial biovolume). In Lake Cisó, the predominant microorganisms were Chromatium spp. (up to 71%) and another purple sulfur bacterium forming aggregates (20%).The bacterial layer could be divided according to the physiological state of the cells into a top part of maximal specific activity, a peak of maximal abundance, and a bottom part of inactive cells. The bacteria in the peak were predominantly limited by light; sulfide, phosphate, and acetate were not limiting in the middle of the day. The light limitation started at the depth having the maximal concentration of cells; the top of the layer appeared to be sulfide‐limited. Specific contents of photopigments, elemental sulfur, and reserve polymers decreased from the top to the bottom of the bacterial layer. These phenomena point to the crucial role of light in the development of layers of phototrophic bacteria in stratified lakes.

1 January 2013
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ricardo GuerreroRicardo Guerrero
Ricardo Guerrero
LMLynn Margulis
Lynn Margulis