Background: Multiple scores have been created in order to predict difficult cholecystectomy, nonetheless there is not a consensuated standard on which to use. The importance of a predictive score to be able to establish a difficult cholecystectomy would be a relevant instrument in order to better inform the patient, properly call for help when needed, choose the correct staff, and schedule and plan the surgical procedure accordingly. Methods: A diagnostic trial study was performed. All different predictive scores for difficult cholecystectomy were calculated for each patient. The correlation between the preoperative score and cholecystectomies considered as “difficult” were measured estimating the preoperative score’s predictive value using a ROC curve in order to predict findings for difficult cholecystectomy. Results: A total of 635 patients between 2014-2021 were selected. Selected patients had a mean age of 55.0 (IQR: 28.00) and were mostly female (64.25%). Surgical outcomes of patients with difficult cholecystectomy had statistically significant higher rates of subtotal cholecystectomies, drain usage, complications and reinterventions, prolonged surgical times, and longer hospital stay. When analyzing the predictive value on each of the different scores applied, score 4 had the highest performance for predicting difficult cholecystectomy with an AUC=0.783 (CI 95% 0.745-0.822). Conclusions: Difficult cholecystectomies are associated with worse surgical outcomes. The standardization and use of predictive scores for difficult cholecystectomy must be implemented in order to improve surgical outcomes as a result of more meticulous planning when scheduling the procedure.

Background: Hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare type of tumour. In adults, the diagnosis remains challenging as the clinical manifestations are generally nonspecific and are usually made too late when complications or metastases are already present, associated with a poor prognosis. Due to the lack of agreement regarding the optimal treatment approach, a comprehensive analysis of the evidence in the literature on the surgical and survival outcomes in terms of disease-free survival time (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients treated for primary hepatic angiosarcoma is needed. Study design: A systematic review of articles published in Pubmed, EMBASE, and Scopus, from 2000 to 2023 with the search terms hepatic angiosarcoma and liver resection or hepatectomy. Pooled individual data concerning the prognosis following various therapies was analyzed. Results: A total of 15 articles involving 886 patients were eligible for inclusion. The male population represents 66.2% (n=586) of the population, with a median age of 57 years (41–66). The median survival rate was 7 months. The median OS after surgical resection was 17.18 months (SD 12.6) vs. 3.72 months (SD 4.6) for patients treated without a surgical approach. The median DFS was 15.2 months (SD 11). Conclusion: Primary liver angiosarcoma remains a surgical challenge with a poor prognosis even with complete surgical resection and adjuvant therapy. Surgical management shows increased overall survival in comparison with non-surgical management. Early diagnosis could change the natural history of the disease. The literature available is scarce, and further studies are required to create standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) is a contraindication for surgical treatment in current guidelines. However, the results of recent studies are questioning this paradigm. We assessed survival outcomes and their predictors following hepatectomy for GCLM in a systematic review of studies published from 2000 to 2022 according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 42,160 references in four databases. Of these, 55 articles providing data from 1990 patients fulfilled our criteria and were included. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at one, three, and five years post-surgery. We studied the impact of potential prognostic factors on survival outcomes via meta-regression. One, three, and five years after surgery, OS was 69.79%, 34.79%, and 24.68%, whereas DFS was 41.39%, 23.23%, and 20.18%, respectively. Metachronous presentation, well-to-moderate differentiation, small hepatic tumoral size, early nodal stage, R0 resection, unilobar compromisation, and solitary lesions were associated with higher overall survival. Metachronous presentation, smaller primary tumoral size, and solitary metastasis were linked to longer DFS. The results of our meta-analysis suggest that hepatectomy leads to favorable survival outcomes in patients with GCLM and provides data that might help select patients who will benefit most from surgical treatment.

Introduction: The risk of choledocholithiasis should be assessed in every patient undergoing cholecystectomy to define the next step. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy proposed a stratified predictor scale of choledocholithiasis. Therefore, we aimed to describe our experience managing patients with an intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis according to the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines and the actual presence of bile duct stones in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Methods: A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. The analysis included sociodemographic data, laboratory values, and imaging. Bivariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed. Results: Three hundred twenty-seven patients had an intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis. Half the patients were at least 65 years old. 24.77% were diagnosed with choledocholithiasis. Bile duct dilation was documented in only 3.06% of cases. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis is associated with an age odds ratio (OR): 1.87 (P 0.02), alkaline phosphatase OR: 2.44 (P 0.02), and bile duct dilation greater than 6 mm OR: 14.65 (P 0.00). Conclusions: High variability in the accuracy of imaging techniques results in a large number of patients classified as intermediate risk without choledocholithiasis in cholangioresonance. Therefore, enhancing the criteria to define intermediate risk for patients in order to optimize resources is of paramount importance.

Background: High-risk surgical procedures represent a fundamental part of general surgery practice due to its significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Different predictive tools have been created in order to quantify perioperative morbidity and mortality risk. POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity) is one of the most widely validated predictive scores considering physiological and operative variables to precisely define morbimortality risk. Nevertheless, seeking greater accuracy in predictions P-POSSUM was proposed. We aimed to compare POSSUM and P-POSSUM for patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods: A retrospective observational study with a prospective database was conducted. Patients over 18 years old who complied with inclusion criteria between 2015 and 2016 were included. Variables included in the POSSUM and P-POSSUM Scores were analyzed. Descriptive statistics of all study parameters were provided. The analysis included socio-demographic data, laboratory values ​​, and imaging. Bivariate analysis was performed. Results: 350 Patients were included in the analysis, 55.1% were female. The mean age was 55.9 ± 20.4 years old. POSSUM revealed a moderated index score in 61.7% of the patients, mean score of 12.85 points ± 5.61. 89.1% of patients had no neoplastic diagnosis associated. Overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14.2% and 7.1%. P-POSSUM could predict more precisely mortality (p < 0.00). Conclusions: The POSSUM score is likely to overestimate the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with high/moderate risk, while the P-POSSUM score seems to be a more accurate predictor of mortality risk. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Background: Central pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing alternative to standard resections for benign or low-grade lesions of the pancreatic neck. While it aims to preserve endocrine and exocrine function, it is associated with significant technical complexity and high rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Aims: To analyze the CP at a single high-volume Brazilian center. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was conducted. All patients undergoing CP at a single high-volume Brazilian center between January 2009 and December 2024 were included. Data on demographics, operative details, pathology, complications (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery – ISGPS/Clavien-Dindo criteria), and long-term pancreatic function were collected. Results: Twenty-two patients underwent CP (mean age 54 years, 72% female). The majority of lesions were cystic (50%) or neuroendocrine tumors (36.4%). The POPF rate was 86.4%, all Grade B, most managed conservatively via prolonged drainage. No Grade C fistulas, postoperative hemorrhages, or mortality occurred. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 22.7%. After a median follow-up of 5.59 years, endocrine insufficiency developed in 9% of patients without prior diabetes (none insulin-dependent), and exocrine insufficiency in 13.6%. Only one locoregional recurrence was observed (isolated metastasis). Conclusions: This first Latin American series demonstrates that central pancreatectomy is a feasible and effective parenchyma-sparing procedure. It provides excellent long-term preservation of pancreatic function with low severe morbidity, despite high rates of manageable POPF. These outcomes support its role as a valuable surgical option for selected patients in experienced centers.